House panel rejects bid to ask for Trumpanazee's tax returns. Classic case of hens guarding the Fox house.
Really! How long can he keep up this dog and pony show. He's the one who cancelled hearings and has not rescheduled them, yet accuses the Democrats on the committee of not being serious to investigate Russian involvement in our elections. He's done everything he can to direct the investigation from that, to leaks and surveillance of Trump, those around him. He's like the little Dutch boy with his finger in the dyke. It's going to blow, and who knows where he'll end up.
... member of the Clown's team of Russian and KGB spies operating from the WH. It is just a bunch of Creeps, Crooks, Criminals and Liars running the show in Washington.
House panel rejects bid to ask for Trumpanazee's tax returns. Classic case of hens guarding the Fox house.
Since he's pretty much already declared Trump guilty of collusion by claiming there is non-circumstantial evidence.
Yet, the MSM hasn't called him out for this and he remains their darling.
Did he say which? 
At least he's doing his job, unlike Nunes, who is acting like Trump's fluffer!
At least he's doing his job, unlike Nunes, who is acting like Trump's fluffer!
Both were equally premature.
The outrage focus depends on which side one is on.
"One went to the NSA and examined evidence and the claimed to the world the evidence most likely exonerated Trump of certain things while the other claimed to the world he had seen evidence that most likely indicated Trump wss guilty of certain things."
I did just come to realize one slight error I made. It was the NSC not the NSA.
Which part of my assertion do you disagree with?
The broad point is that both chairman are politicizing this and taking actions and making statements that run counter to a fair and logical investigation, yet only Nunes is being castigated.
-- Modified on 3/30/2017 7:36:04 PM
Sally Yates, will testify. Soon.
It was pushed back because they wanted to interview Comey and Rogers again, and get their information first. Then use that information to challenge the testimony of Yates.
Hell the entire Russia hacked our election is likely bullshit. The FBI used a third party source for that information. Hearsay. Now that company has backed away from their methodology. The DNC, refused to allow the FBI to look at their servers. Why would they do that? Because of the crimes they committed. The entire Russia thing may very well turn out to be completely fabricated to cover Obama's spying and Hillary's loss. Just wait, it'll come out, all the fuckery that Obama's and his people pulled thinking she's win and then it would all get flushed down the shitter. Well she lost, now that info will come out.
Obama sends message he's ready to roll out with the residence, Trump tweets that he was "wiretapped" by Obama, Obama runs out of country for a month. Seems a bit weird. Or may he just missed Reggie's manlove...
Believe what?
Obama and his Reggie manlove?
Or the evidentiary chain that needs to be followed? That you interview X to get Y testimony so that you can ask Z about what X said in reference to Y? Yates is small potatoes. She'll testify and if it's in public they can't really get much from her. All of this is related to classified material which cannot legally be discussed in public.
She testifies in public, then in a week or two she'll be back to testify in a closed session. The public testimony is a circus act.