Write Review
1,892,132 Total Reviews 3,642 New Reviews
9,394 Users Online

Politics and Religion

And you can't even come close to proving her true, except I & GaG totally discredited her. (eom)
ed2000 31 Reviews 134 reads
posted


END OF MESSAGE

mattradd1030 reads

Thanks to his old buddy Trump.

Related Link: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/state-department-civil-servants-trump-ti...

ReplyQuoteReport
ed2000170 reads

It must be wishful thinking on the part of this author. Why believe her? I would normally hope it's just sour grapes but I'm betting her goal here is more nefarious.

She is even less credible than the ex-CIA author earlier this week that claimed the sky was falling and claimed to be non-partisan but then it was revealed he had contributed $5000 to Clinton.

She also claims to be non political in her State Department post but it was revealed she was a gate keeper at the State Department for The Clinton Foundation. Someone shows up at the State Department wanting to do business or partner with the U.S. but her first order of business was to determine if they were an FOB (Friend of Bill & Hillary) so they could be first routed to the collection gates of the Clinton Global Initiative.

Related Link: FOBs line up to the left and have a seat. Everyone else gets shown the the door.

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGambler187 reads

Here's something else from her, written the day after the election that blows any claim she has to be "non political" completely out of the water.

Related Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/caitlin-klevorick/thank-you-secretary-clint_b_13057010.html

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd181 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
earlweaver159 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd161 reads

anything specifically you take issue with, like: "Today, of the 116 posts that the Partnership for Public Service has identified as “key” at State, only two are filled."

I guess I have an advantage you do not have, in that I know people who work in the State Department, and what I hear from them rings true with what the author reports. Two of them use to be Hillary haters, and came to feel much the same as the author expressed in GaG's link.

ReplyQuoteReport
ed2000253 reads

That quote from Max Stier's "non-partisan" group may be the only honest thing about the op-ed, but then again he was one of Bill Clinton's defense attorneys and then given a job at HUD, so who knows.

-- Modified on 2/23/2017 10:30:58 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd203 reads

You still don't or can't refute the specifics in what she says!  ;)

-- Modified on 2/24/2017 8:58:20 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
ed2000135 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd170 reads

And, that's the major problem with you, beside your constant claim to 'the truth'. You think you can prove things on an anonymous fuck board. The best one can do is state their opinion, and hopefully what that opinion is based on. That's all I did. I'm not trying to prove anything! ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
ed2000254 reads

Why go further? I did try to verify her quote which is how I learned so much about Stiers. (BTW, that is a good example of one reason a even hang around here.)

You are indeed correct that I cannot recall a single instance where I have ever proven anything to you. It may have happened. I just cannot recall.

I am not some sort of supreme keeper of the truth, but when I see things that clearly look untrue to me, I diligently attempt to correct the malfeasance. I believe I typically give evidence as to why. Acceptance or rejection of that evidence is obviously left to each reader. I even make mistakes. Most recently I repeatedly called out saltyballs for not understanding gambling payouts accurately. Turns out he was right and I was wrong. I posted an apology right up front as a new thread because the OP had moved far down the second page, but it was denied by admin. I repeatedly tried to persuade admin otherwise but their stubbornness rivaled yours. I finally sent him a PM. I never heard back and he hasn't posted since.  

BTW, one should be able to assume that in general if the evidence you offer, upon which you base your opinion, is shown to be flawed then you would alter your opinion but I'm not holding my breath.

-- Modified on 2/25/2017 12:11:42 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!