Politics and Religion

Ivanka will continue to succeed with her clothing line.teeth_smile
quadseasonal 27 Reviews 325 reads
posted

The Left is TOTALLY  POWERLESS to cause  Ivanka's  businesses decline  or influence President Trump's decisions.
 
  For every Lefty lunatic  boycotting Ivanka  because of  their opinion of her Dad, Ivanka will gain two new customers from the rational side.  
     
   In other words, the Left Wing is only successful doing what they do best,  throwing  fits of excrement, helping the GOP and  "America First" President Trump gain more supporters.

saltyballs2956 reads

Can you spell clusterfucked! The Yemen raid was so successful that the Yemeni government has asked the U.S. to stop conducting ground operations. However the Trump WH is up in arms against McCain for his negative comments about the raids success. For Trump it's always a success in Trumpland, the  swamps are drained, America is great again, and everyone gets to have free BJ.'s. In fact, things are so awesome that clean water and air aren't needed anymore. Whoopie Trump!

anyone who doesn't agree is unpatriotic and un-American. It will be a revisit to the times when Georgie was in office, and the Republican would make those charges toward anyone who criticized him. ;)

Mr.M.Johnson394 reads

he simply lies and makes up Fake News and/or denies the truth

The question is:  how much longer will people, including Republicans,  keep listening and believing Trump...

,,,,,with taxpayer money and time to complain about his daughter's business in public.

You pledge 19 days ago that you won't get involved in your family's business...then you call out Nordstrom for having taste.....FOCUS YOU FUCK!.

a demagogue who could care less about the unemployed and the homeless but rather worries about his poor little rich children..i still am amazed that the American people actually voted for this living piece of shit..

Posted By: hpygolky
You pledge 19 days ago that you won't get involved in your family's business...then you call out Nordstrom for having taste.....FOCUS YOU FUCK!.

earlweaver371 reads

he is going to do what he is going to do

and ain't nuthin nobody can do about it

except whine

he's right

pulling her stuff is obviously political retaliation

fuck Nordstrom and the others, ain't nothing but lib bullies

libs hate getting hit back

Trump can hurt their sales with a word

fucking good

Sluggish sales, slow retail economy cause them to drop her line. She knew about this a month ago. Which means she knew this was coming months ago. Now how many jobs might be in limbo? Nice work donnie boy. We need you to create jobs, not loose them. Could I recast my vote? I don't see this working.

On December 6, 1950, Washington Post Music Critic Paul Hume published this review of Truman's daughter, Margaret Truman's after she sang at Constitution Hall:

"Miss Truman is a unique American phenomenon with a pleasant voice of little size and fair quality, (she) cannot sing very well, is flat a good deal of the time, more last night than at any time we have heard her in past years, has not improved in the years we have heard her, (and) still cannot sing with anything approaching professional finish."

************************

President Truman responded with the following letter to Hume:

THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
Dec. 6, 1950

Mr. Hume:

I've just read your lousy review of Margaret's concert. I've come to the conclusion that you are an "eight ulcer man on four ulcer pay."

It seems to me that you are a frustrated old man who wishes he could have been successful. When you write such poppy-cock as was in the back section of the paper you work for it shows conclusively that you're off the beam and at least four of your ulcers are at work.

Some day I hope to meet you. When that happens you'll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for black eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!

Pegler, a gutter snipe, is a gentleman alongside you. I hope you'll accept that statement as a worse insult than a reflection on your ancestry.

H.S.T.

-- Modified on 2/9/2017 12:59:21 AM

You can take you place along side Jack as Trump apologist. It may be, very, very, soon that it will be a very, very lonely place to be! ;)

You can't find one apology I've made for him.

I guess it's a really sad day for you.

Not really. It's a beautiful sunshiny day here. I've had a great breakfast, seated outside, at my favorite restaurant. And, now I get to watch you, once again, straining at gnats, and twisting yourself in knots! ;)

It's that Matt is now a total liar as well.  

Not sure how I am an "apologist" when I called Trump a liar just two weeks ago here and when I bashed him for the travel ban rollout last week.  

Some apologist!

Facts no longer matter to Matt, which is so ironic as he calls Trump a liar and claims he is unable to live in a fact filled world.

Matt really has become what he hates in Trump.  

Sad...

But, on balance, it seems to me, whenever someone criticizes Trump, you are one of the first, here, to jump up and defend him, or challenge the criticism. Even with apologists, the old saying about "exceptions to the rule," apply! ;)

But now you are saying "on balance" so that is more of a rational statement out of you.

I only feel the need to defend him against bogus, unsubstantiated charges or against butt hurt people who cant get over they lost the election with picayune complaints.

That doesn't mean there aren't substantive areas of disagreement with Trump, but labeling him a dictator or Nazi or any or the other hateful comparisons libs have done recently doesn't do your cause any good, imo.

Yes, I have curtailed some of my criticism as he is at the beginning of his admin. If he doesn't come through with tax reform, or he greatly adds to the debt, or gets into nation building, I will destroy him here, as I have done in the past.

If he goes down that "Mexican" judge nonsense road again, I will excoriate him. If he picks on another gold star family, I will trash him. Just like I did in the past.

On your side, I don't get any sense whatsoever you could possibly be fair to him. He will do nothing right. I am giving him a honeymoon until I see more evidence.

You seem to have already made up your mind. Its possible I will get to where you are in time but lets see what happens over the next 6-12 months. Lets see if the "little guy" you say you so care about gets a better deal in life.

Lets see. But to trash him day and night incessantly for the 2+ weeks he has been in office is just asinine with a side order of sour grapes.

But there isn't any need to "Taffy" me with the "apologist" bullshit.  I mean feel free to do so, its a fuck board and all, but it's a lie nonetheless.

And deep inside, I think you know that. ;)

at least until you announce the end of, what you deem as Trump's honeymoon.

However, I want to make it clear, though you did not say I personally had done so:

"but labeling him a dictator or Nazi or any or the other hateful comparisons libs have done recently doesn't do your cause any good,..."

I've search my message, and confirmed my suspicions and memory, that I have not called him either.

 
"On your side, I don't get any sense whatsoever you could possibly be fair to him. He will do nothing right."

On the first part, it's going to be extremely difficult, due to his birtherism activity. If one tries to invalidate a president, he should expect the same treatment himself. As far as the second, when GaG challenged that no libs would back Trump's position in condemning the House Republicans from gutting the Ethics office, I did.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=39&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=libs%20Trump&SearchType=2&Author=GaGambler&DayFrom=60&DayTo=1&MessageID=293727&frmSearch=1#293727

To me it seems like a case of "if you're not with him (100%) then you must be against him."

I believe Matt has a difficult time understanding facts when  they don't fit well with  his point of view.

   Huff Puff likely has enormous influence confusing Matt's mind, similar to warped analysis year after year, by the other side who continually listen to  Bill O'Reilly or Glenn Beck.  

 If I held grudges I'd hate you Jack Dunphy, for ALWAYS  dissing my favorite Presidential candidate, before he became popular " America First" President Trump. :-D
  We do appreciate you and the millions of No Trump primary voters, who now have an open mind and join in with our successes you agree with.  
   
   Have you noticed the Left will rarely speak against their leader?
  That's weird IMO.  
  I hope I don't get fired for disagreeing with President Trump on the Dakota pipeline.  
  I doubt I will, President Trump does have an open mind, like you. :-D

Posted By: JackDunphy
It's that Matt is now a total liar as well.  
   
 Not sure how I am an "apologist" when I called Trump a liar just two weeks ago here and when I bashed him for the travel ban rollout last week.  
   
 Some apologist!  
   
 Facts no longer matter to Matt, which is so ironic as he calls Trump a liar and claims he is unable to live in a fact filled world.  
   
 Matt really has become what he hates in Trump.  
   
 Sad...

I didn't "always" diss Trump. I did so when I though he needed it. He acts like a jackass far too often, has incredibly thin skin and has embarrassed himself many times in the past and he does have to watch how he talks about race/nationality/American hero issues.

Like I told Matt, I am willing to give him time. Some things he says and does scares me. I think if you were being 100% honest, he has placed you in difficult spots of trying to defend him.

Sometimes he is indefensible. No need to rehash those issues but pm me if you need specifics. Sometimes he is just plain wrong and wont admit it, but that would put him in the company of his two most recent predecessors who rarely ever admitted they were wrong.

Lets give him time before we declare him the next Reagan or Nixon. It really is up in the air whether he will be more like the former than the latter but you know where my hope lies.

I think he didn't pick up on a bit of sarcasm where you momentarily put yourself in the shoes of the Left.

I will say one thing that if Trump and others had been less abrasive and abrupt with his public statements regarding Muslim bans, the 9th Circuit would have felt they had nothing to decry intent, not that they should have in the first place.

Did Bess launch her jewelry and clothing line? And how did Truman International hotels do, expansion in foreign countries? Nordsrtom made a business decision. Trump made a comment to hurt Nordstrom financially. Companies breaking from a poor selling brand don't happen overnight, everyone could see the writing on the wall for months, even Ivanka knew it was coming... You can't compare the two, if you can...But then you'll defend trump no matter what.....but at sometime, you'll get tired of defending this fuck.

of Trump and you cannot see any similarities then you are as blinded by partisanship if not more than matt.

Just for the record, what do you think would happen if Trump said he was going to beat the CEO of Nordstrums about the head and groin the next time they met?

Stick to defending trump, sooner later you'll finally figure this out. Who would trump beat, Blake or Eric? For shits and giggles, how about if trump said, "My sons can kick the shit out of both of you"...now if that happen, I'd say it was typical for trump, being the buffoon that he is. Did you get that???

-- Modified on 2/9/2017 7:51:56 PM

It must be reassuring to be so 100% positive you understand everyone's motive. Too bad you are so blind as to your own.

The Left is TOTALLY  POWERLESS to cause  Ivanka's  businesses decline  or influence President Trump's decisions.
 
  For every Lefty lunatic  boycotting Ivanka  because of  their opinion of her Dad, Ivanka will gain two new customers from the rational side.  
     
   In other words, the Left Wing is only successful doing what they do best,  throwing  fits of excrement, helping the GOP and  "America First" President Trump gain more supporters.

That are "Budget" orientated. If that's where she wants her brand to be displayed. But I think she should fire her designers and get more involved in who her audience is, almost like a reset....I haven't come across anyone who likes her line.And I'm in the fashion business,

Just because you haven't seen it has ABSOLUTELY no bearing on whether it's there or not.  
  Ivanka's clothing line sales increased by 29 million in 2016.  
 
   I hope your fashion business  did that well.
   If not, I seriously doubt  your advice would help her sales.   :-D
 Google:  Ivanka Trump 100 million in sales

Posted By: hpygolky
That are "Budget" orientated. If that's where she wants her brand to be displayed. But I think she should fire her designers and get more involved in who her audience is, almost like a reset....I haven't come across anyone who likes her line.And I'm in the fashion business,

If jobbers like TJ Maxx are running from her, flea markets aren't too far behind. And I've seen her line, it's not for everybody...by the way,have you guys figured out how to turn the lights on at the West Wing yet?? Now that is pathetic, can't find the light switch...because you're so occupied defending the fuck.

earlweaver256 reads

see, they're thinking about the poor!

Register Now!