When I have vip, I use the general views a lot. I'll check narratives, but these pseudo-Prousts with their excessively long emotional narratives and lack of details frustrate too. I brought her to her 11th orgasm ... she commented on my excessively large member ... please!!!!!!! Save it for your novel.
Give us the down-and-dirty. AND the system ought to be changed to indicate those details in each review--I get God-damned frustrated to have to indicate all the bs of kiss with tongue, etc when it does not show up at all in terms of my review. Rant over. This is why ter is losing ground (though they are likely unaware) and might want to listen to rants. I have on many, many, many occasions notified ter of discrepancies between the general details and specifics in reviews--i.e., reviewers x, y, and z have indicated cim, but general says no. Typical response is that the review stands. So you have folks reviewing reviews who are either scared, stupid, or ... I don't know what mental incapacity to describe ... to do anything to rectify the inconsistencies. Rant over now./
Midweek rant about reviews that say one thing in the check boxes and then contradict themselves in the details. For example: Kissing indicates "Don't know" and then the details go on to say how much the reviewer enjoyed "DFK". Is it just me or does it bother other hobbyists as well?
Everything is always YMMV when the service is personal. Good chemistry goes a long way...
Unless the Provider initiates a prob report the profile never changes from the original content created by her first reviewer .
So yes, profile might report kissing as " don't know" if the first reviewer wasn't into kissing.
Read the narratives. Might also consider contacting reviewers via PMs.
sometimes the check boxes don't and pulldowns don't say what I want to say. So just say it in the details and then that doesn't match, but its out there.
The narrative doesn't help much when using the "search" engine to filter prospective new friends.
When I have vip, I use the general views a lot. I'll check narratives, but these pseudo-Prousts with their excessively long emotional narratives and lack of details frustrate too. I brought her to her 11th orgasm ... she commented on my excessively large member ... please!!!!!!! Save it for your novel.
Give us the down-and-dirty. AND the system ought to be changed to indicate those details in each review--I get God-damned frustrated to have to indicate all the bs of kiss with tongue, etc when it does not show up at all in terms of my review.
Rant over. This is why ter is losing ground (though they are likely unaware) and might want to listen to rants.
I have on many, many, many occasions notified ter of discrepancies between the general details and specifics in reviews--i.e., reviewers x, y, and z have indicated cim, but general says no. Typical response is that the review stands. So you have folks reviewing reviews who are either scared, stupid, or ... I don't know what mental incapacity to describe ... to do anything to rectify the inconsistencies.
Rant over now./