Of course we all wish her well. Longevity is the key and time tells all tales.

It's not a matter of the reviews being reliable they ARE reliable. Anyone who has ever used PM knows this. It is a question of who wrote some of them. Factual reviews are factual reviews. The only question is the author. Don't shoot the messenger if the messenger is correct regardless of who the messenger is. This stuff goes on all the time here. This board is loaded with politics. Some get caught and some don't. They did. You can question the PM review writers if you want, but if you have ever used them you can NEVER question the fucking service...literally.

We don't know that they were pulled for being self-written. Anyone who wants to edify us, I'm all ears.

For the record, I've seen Anna and Gina of Pretty Maids. I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of any of their reviews, based on my experiences. I'm also pretty sure I'm not Bruce, though I WISH I was Nikki Avalon's pool boy. I hear there's a rather large applicant pool for that position, though...

Bruce strikes me (in my conversations with him, though they were short and businesslike, and the handful of posts he's made here) as the kind of guy who'd get PO'ed enough about the accusation that he's been shilling to pull his agency's reviews anyway, so he doesn't have to hear about it. He's got enough critical mass at this point that he might do OK by word of mouth and other outlets than TER. I don't know that this has happened, mind you, but it's another possibility.