i know a provider that had a review that the guy said "i can't believe she has a 14 year old daughter!" wtf does that have anything to do with a review. I have no problem with stuff like that being removed. But if it comes down to an opinion and what the hobbiest experienced good or bad i think it should stay.
How does Hot Claudia get her negative reviews ( the ones about her maybe being a TS)removed but is still allowed to keep her good ones, while other girls have to make a choice, all or nothing! Just curious.
good question, meal ticket can u give us an answer?
Others have done it as well; don't know how but I can name at least one...just not here.
sometimes some are just obviously someone trying to slam the provider. a while ago i even helped get one removed because of obvious lies. i would think that a review like that about being a TS and it not being true would not be good. i can see why TER would remove that for her. But true, other times the provider gets lucky and they remove just that one bad review, mostly if it is inconsistant with others. i don't think that is fair because it may have been the only review to actually tell the truth and warn us, the hobbiests.
You were reading my mind, weren't you?
Otherwise, it is someone trying to hurt the providers reputation. If a person had a bad experience with a provider, they should not make unverified off the cuff remarks like "she looks like a TS" or stuff like that.
xoxox
Anik
i know a provider that had a review that the guy said "i can't believe she has a 14 year old daughter!" wtf does that have anything to do with a review. I have no problem with stuff like that being removed. But if it comes down to an opinion and what the hobbiest experienced good or bad i think it should stay.
Sometimes the review can be linked to someone who is clearly trying to trash the provider.
Sometimes a review is posted by another provider who foolishly uses her own computer and the IP address links her to the new user. (That is REALLY bad, she gets banned)
Sometimes the review says things that are clearly not true about the provider. For instance, they may have screwed up and said it was an incall when the provider only does outcall.
Sometimes the review says they saw the provider on such and such date in such and such city, but the provider can prove she was in another city.
TMT
So you were able to determine that 2 pages worth of reviews were phony?