Politics and Religion
Re: Yelp both families are part of secret society.
...have any issues with her, like at all. Period. I bet you have more issues with her then me because I believe that all the staff that's been coming out about her and her husband is being blown out of proportion and is totally irrelevant in regards to how either of them do as president.
Also I'm very happy with the way the Clintons treated Bernie, Wasserman-Schultz and the whole shebang. First, they're Democrats, Bernie was an imposter who didn't have enough balls to run as what he was, a Socialist. Second, politics is a contact sport. Can't stand the heat, can't play the game - I don't want you for my president whatever you stands are.
Trump was right and I feel genuine when he called Hillary "the fighter that doesn't give up"; I think being a pro in his game himself, not too deep inside Trump actually admires Hillary. Personally I believe that Hillary Clinton would make the best president we had in a while, better then what we have now and the one that we had right before by 1000 miles, that's for sure but...
...irrespective of how I feel about Hillary
1. I can't help but noticed that she's one of the most unpopular politicians we ever had.
2. Most of the people don't seem to share in my opinion that 90%, if not all, of the Clintons' scandals are irrelevant. I feel that the Clintons are in touch with their roots (Trump is too, he loves his fellow rich guys and like a true son of a rich guy doesn't give a damn about whether you and I live or die), that Bill's wife will resolve most of the problems inflicted on the country by our last two presidents in exactly the same way as her husband did in the 90s. That, just like her husband did (and unlike Obama), she'll succeed in most of her foreign policy endeavors and will manage to lose very few soldiers in doing that. Bill, by the way, succeeded in every operation he had American military engaged in and lost ZERO soldiers unlike of course our last two imbeciles.
3. By the most important thing is that I just love "the game", its pros and cons and how I see various players trying to affect it either to their benefit or detriment. I pride myself in being able to analyze issues free of my partisanship and draw conclusions as they come out to me and not as I like them to come out. Like I feel that the Clintons' people make a lot of mistakes in evaluating people's reactions to this or that and that's one of the main reasons that she still may lose the election.
As for Truman-Dewey scenario, I think you got to be either fully ignorant or totally (not legally now - totally) blind not to see possible parallels.
Also I'm very happy with the way the Clintons treated Bernie, Wasserman-Schultz and the whole shebang. First, they're Democrats, Bernie was an imposter who didn't have enough balls to run as what he was, a Socialist. Second, politics is a contact sport. Can't stand the heat, can't play the game - I don't want you for my president whatever you stands are.
Trump was right and I feel genuine when he called Hillary "the fighter that doesn't give up"; I think being a pro in his game himself, not too deep inside Trump actually admires Hillary. Personally I believe that Hillary Clinton would make the best president we had in a while, better then what we have now and the one that we had right before by 1000 miles, that's for sure but...
...irrespective of how I feel about Hillary
1. I can't help but noticed that she's one of the most unpopular politicians we ever had.
2. Most of the people don't seem to share in my opinion that 90%, if not all, of the Clintons' scandals are irrelevant. I feel that the Clintons are in touch with their roots (Trump is too, he loves his fellow rich guys and like a true son of a rich guy doesn't give a damn about whether you and I live or die), that Bill's wife will resolve most of the problems inflicted on the country by our last two presidents in exactly the same way as her husband did in the 90s. That, just like her husband did (and unlike Obama), she'll succeed in most of her foreign policy endeavors and will manage to lose very few soldiers in doing that. Bill, by the way, succeeded in every operation he had American military engaged in and lost ZERO soldiers unlike of course our last two imbeciles.
3. By the most important thing is that I just love "the game", its pros and cons and how I see various players trying to affect it either to their benefit or detriment. I pride myself in being able to analyze issues free of my partisanship and draw conclusions as they come out to me and not as I like them to come out. Like I feel that the Clintons' people make a lot of mistakes in evaluating people's reactions to this or that and that's one of the main reasons that she still may lose the election.
As for Truman-Dewey scenario, I think you got to be either fully ignorant or totally (not legally now - totally) blind not to see possible parallels.
Truman was a sitting president, also with VP experience. His character was unquestioned. When Truman was elected, contrary to flawed polling, it was in no way a disaster for the country.
Should Trump win, contrary to current polls... well, that would be another thing entirely.
Should Trump win, contrary to current polls... well, that would be another thing entirely.