And you'll find many of these higher priced ladies do not allow the graphic reviews you guys are fond of. They will have a review page of sorts on their websites and there is usually nothing that is remotely incriminating on them.
They rarely see board hobbyists for all the reasons we've been discussing so I wouldn't get your shorts in a bunch...you seem to like to know whats on the menu beforehand.
I am in the process of researching Providers for a future trip to the SF area. A couple of times I have found on Provider's websites a notation "GFE not provided" or "No GFE." It has been on websites for very expensive ( >$1K) providers. What does that mean? I would think I would expect GFE if I was going to spend over 4 figures for their company.
In my experience, that's what they always mean by that no-GFE...no kissing.
I don't consider myself a High dollar hottie but I do require more than an hr. and I am not fond of DFK but LFK is fine. I am not in high school so I don't appreciate being choked by a tongue. Choke me with something elseLOL!!!
Get a life, yo geeks!
Not a very impressive 2nd message on a board where you say you are looking for help.
jazz32
WTF Nice way for a provider to introduce herself to the board.
She is not introducing herself to this board...the poster mentioned it. These women do not want to see the types of men who frequent the boards. It's their way of screening you out. Odds on she has no reviews on here or anywhere else. Obviously she is doing just fine or she would have taken the "No GFE" off her site. It's plain that she is not after the men who seek that.
Not every lady wants to swap bodily fluids with 100's of 1000's of men. And don't get me wrong...you can still deliver a very good session with foreplay, attention, warmth and attitude. Hey you like what you like and some guys like it their way.
She is only doing what some of you on here do...no DFK, BBBJ etc. deal breaker. She just says you want DFK, BBBJ then no appointment.
this was her second post here. Here was her first. If it wasn't for her first post, I would have no problem with her second, but insulting the very people she just asked for advice. Well all I can say is ...well I've already said it.
I see where you thought I meant Shannon....sorry for the blip...I didn't read all the posts as I was only interested in the first. Go back to general programming...
I would think that it means no kissing, just stick it in and get it over with. Come visit me i Augusta I am all GFE.
It means you should assume nothing and go by a gal's reviews. Even some girls who call themselves GFE do not allow DFK. It's best to read all that you can about her and, even then, expect the first visit to be an experiment. I don't go to an appointment with an activities punch-list in my pocket. I go looking for a good time. If I have a good time I will probably go back. If I don't I won't.
I'm not saying that lying is OK but if you ask ten different people what "GFE" means you will most likely get ten different answers....and a "YMMV" caveat to boot!
And you'll find many of these higher priced ladies do not allow the graphic reviews you guys are fond of. They will have a review page of sorts on their websites and there is usually nothing that is remotely incriminating on them.
They rarely see board hobbyists for all the reasons we've been discussing so I wouldn't get your shorts in a bunch...you seem to like to know whats on the menu beforehand.
Usually means no kissing or possibly kissing without tongue. Sometimes BBBJ is included in the GFE definition. Every guy has his preferences and ladies have there boundaries. The key is mutual respect by all for all. Read the reviews (not just the profiles) and you should have a great time.
No GFE means no kissing usually. Most providers though do offer it, but sometimes its just Light Face Kissing and only for a little bit til the main event. As stated above read, read, read if I studied more in school like I do on TER I'd have a PHD by now.
Dr. Boner
As BostonGuy correctly pointed out, no one can really define what GFE actually means. Some men will not consider a provider GFE because she doesn’t DFK. Still other men will not consider a provider GFE because she doesn’t provide BBBJ. Everything is subjective; no rules.
However, why would you even bother to go to a provider who advertises on her website that she is not GFE? To me, she has already put a damper on the service beforehand by essentially warning you that the session might be very vanilla, mechanical and boring.
Even for someone like myself who treats this hobby for what it really is, a business, I would have reservations about going to a provider who said up front she was not GFE. It may just mean she doesn’t kiss or it may mean she just provides straight forward mish (with nothing else). Or worse, it might be indicative that she is a provider who will just simply go through the motions of a session without any real conversation, emotion or passion. If you want more than just to get laid, why take a chance? And, even more to the bottom line, is it worth paying over a $1,000 to find out?? Spend your money elsewhere.
Thanks for the replies. They confirm what I would have thought. As referenced in the above answer by Marere4, there is a good link on prior GFE discussion. To quote one member:
"GFE should be about attitude. Does she act happy to see you when you walk through the door? As though you were her long lost lover? Does she take her time seducing you and pleasuring you? When its over, does she spend time cuddling with and touching you? Those are the marks of a good GFE in my opinion."
Not that I would consider spending 4 figures to a Provider who up front states ""No GFE" but why would anyone spend that much money?? I agree that kissing and attitude is what makes a GFE and so my confusion that some Providers would charge over 4 figures just for the sex act without all the foreplay and stimulation. Just me being a newbie and thinking that the more you pay the more complete & well rounded the experience should be.
To me, if I would see an ad that said "gfe not provided", I would defintely not see her. I think that would mean that it's going to be a pretty emotionless, go-through-the-motions session that I would find unsatisfying.
Runningman