I had a 3some with MimiLaxx and Seda and that was a 10 performance wise.

I was Needledick the Pornstar!

NDtBF

I try to wait a couple weeks for the thrill to where off, or i fall into this category myself.

Maybe TER should standardize by supplying check boxes to what happens, and, instead of the hobbyist setting the score, an algorithm sets the score based on the check boxes selected.

Mysterydude

The rule is clear.  If a provider offers at least 3 of the 5 listed services, then she is eligible for a 10.  So, if your provider does DFK, BBBJ, and offers doubles, then she would be eligible for a 10 score on performance.  Offering Anal sex is not a requirement for a 10.  

"An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum."

No point in having a system that runs 1-10 if only 8-10 are used. More than just the number though, I go by the qualitative measure.

A 7 performance rating means I had a really fun time. I would repeat with a 7. An 8 means she went a little above and beyond, or as TER puts it: "Went the Extra Mile".

Now I haven't given any 1-6 scores but that's because I do tons of research, and have been lucky so far.  If the need arose, I'd write up a 1/1 no problem.

Overrating really does annoy me. It's like when you're in a project meeting with say 10 features/objectives and ask management to flag which ones are high priority. Then the suits pick 7 of them as MISSION CRITICAL and the rest HIGH PRIORITY. Well damn, I'm not saying any of the objectives won't be done. I need you guys to pick out which to do first. /slap

If everyone is a 10, then no one is a 10.

single or double, always a 10....

When I rate a session with a provider I base it on the overall experience with her and not on the TER official handbook checklist. For example I have given only one 10/10 in my long and sorted career and that was to Blaire Whitmore. Now Blaire does not offer Anal which technically should prevent her from reaching a 10....and since I did not finish with a BJ the CIM option was not there either.....BUT I you read my (and othe's) review of her you will she that it was one of the most intensly erotic and sexually intense sessions that I have ever had because Blaire is highly orgasmic and loves sex and it certainly qualifed as a once in a lifetime experience for me.

Now on the other end of the spectrum I have had sessions where the provider offered (and we attempted) all of the items on the checklist but the overall experience was just average....there is no way I am giving out a 10.

In my opinion the burden should be on the Hobbyist to write a better review to help the team understand why the provider earned the score he gave her.  A 4 line review that lists all the appropriate ackronyms....DFK, DATY, Greek and BBBJTCIM etc....with a score of 10 is useless to me. It tells me nothing about the experience or what to expect from the lady. I would much rather see a review where the Hobbyist details why it was a Once in a Lifetime for him which allows me to decide if I want to see the lady. It may not be a 10 for me but I would take that over the checklist.

Just my $0.02.......Hobby On!

I know I've given a couple 10's.  But at the time I gave them I thought she was the hottest I had the chance to meet.  Then later I get the opportunity to meet another that is just as good or better, so I have no choice but to give her a 10 also.

That being said, when i look at other's reviews, I always knock the average down a notch.  So if she averages a 9, then i figure she'll be pretty hot, if she averages an 8, it's still promising, but no longer will I see an average below an 8, even if her looks really tempt me because I feel most people inflate their ratings (and weight scale also)

I have given 10s twice recently.  One was for a 3 way with Anica and Jenny in which all criteria were met.  I felt this was truly a one in a lifetime event.

The second occasion was recently with Cumisha Amado.  I don't think I would get too many arguments that this experience was not a 10.

I believe the service level has risen so much in the last couple of years that sometimes we are overwelmed by the great service offered.

By the time I got to see Mimi Laxxx, she was UTR and didn't want anymore reviews.  But she is the only 10/10 I've ever experienced.  I know the 10 in looks is subjective, but she does it for me.  She definitely deserves the 10 in performance under TER guidelines.  The best ever as far as I am concerned.

are inconsistent with the services detailed in the profile the score is downgraded.

The problem is profiles are not upgraded. A top K-doll no longer does doubles and was never really bi ( for her it's all a show) yet the profile has not been modified to reflect her current menu. She consistently gets 10's for performance despite the fact she no longer offers the services that constitute a 10 according to review guidelines .

I have no problem with her getting 10s because her overall performance  is off the charts.there should be a system that enables those who are stellar in every area but don't bring in partners nor offer Greek to be numerically recognized. There are many intangibles that make an experience a once in a lifetime.