It's an unhappy double standard, no doubt about it, but providers have always been treated more unfairly than their clients throughout history.
As for your question, so long as your "unique identifier" is not your real full name, you largely are OK if you follow basic precautions.
And that's simply due to the fact of a reference system or ID system in some combination. P411, Date check, handle, email, or phone number will have to remain the same to identify a hobbyist. Obvi at the low level you can play with burner phones and the girls will physically do a LE check or offer stripper/massage service and go from there.
As technology/time cost go down. it's very easy for LE to track a unique ID...I mean they do it with cookies and other exploits so when you click an ad they are into ya phone. LE could run a google ad sting in certain areas and all of the google ad sense will put something on ya system if ya click and sometimes impression. And not to mention calls/text can be pulled out the air/intercepted legally if you create a fake tower.
cause we all know when/if you get big/prolific LE will take out a BP ad on ya because they try to pile on other probable causes....We witnessed it not too long ago! And granted, I haven't seen it...but LE could hobby to build references to go after a bigger fish. And we all know LE can take accounts of people caught and pretend to be them in order to take down a big fish.
Is it best to switch up the unique identifier ever so often?...or keep one unique identifier and use different phone numbers when contacting the girls? I always assume knowing the law is the best safeguard in this hobby for a client as in not what you know...what you can prove is definitely the moto
Law enforcement does not pursue "clients". They pursue escorts, and if they can net some clients at the same time, they will. But they do not mount a large scale investigation in order to nab a single client.
It's an unhappy double standard, no doubt about it, but providers have always been treated more unfairly than their clients throughout history.
As for your question, so long as your "unique identifier" is not your real full name, you largely are OK if you follow basic precautions.
It's an unhappy double standard, no doubt about it, but providers have always been treated more unfairly than their clients throughout history.
As for your question, so long as your "unique identifier" is not your real full name, you largely are OK if you follow basic precautions.
I guess Barack-4-A-7645 doesn't draw attention if the man is tapping or the man gets access to girls emails/list,lol. I mean it's easy to find probable cause and ya tap the presidents phone to be safe. Girls have list and you may assume important clients in a high price range and track activity to a certain number.
Hey Obama let me see ya drivers license and put some clues together.
I guess it comes down to limitation laws as well. And it comes down to the choice of your unique identifier and it may be best to get rid of certain identifiers once you feel established