actually they are oriented to protect TER legally. We point to the Ad so we can now post the information given in the ad such as phone number, name, etc.
I understand that it's really handy to have a valid URL for a provider that includes her name, pic, and phone, but with flaky providers that can often be elusive and then you are rejecting reviews that can protect your members from getting ripped off.
Case in point: a provider that advertises on Craigslist and puts her photos on imagedeposit.com. If I provide the URL for the Craigslist ad, it will be valid when you verify my review, but not valid a few days later. If I provide the imagedeposit.com link, it will be valid for a long time, but will not include her name (which changes daily anyway) or phone number.
I think your policies are so oriented towards "protecting" TER from giving out free VIP membership time that you forget the real purpose of reviews!!!! How about accepting the review, but not giving VIP credit for it in such a case? Or accept 2 URL's on one provider?
actually they are oriented to protect TER legally. We point to the Ad so we can now post the information given in the ad such as phone number, name, etc.