He said in 1987 he was lying about Trump.
Why do you believe him now?I had no idea that "Art of the Deal" was ghostwritten. That must come as quit a blow to his brain dead "cultists".
Any simpleton could tell Tony Schwartz, is the author, his is the only other name on the cover.
Perfect for you, though
go for it!
At first I thought you wanted to discuss nuclear arms, looks like I was wrong as usually..
The article was a book plug.
That he is the co-author.
there is a difference but uneducated people would not know that.
or they simply lie to fit their agenda.
or in this case both.
You're Welcome
In Welchers We Distrust
Even if Trump does not issue a launch order, adversarial nations will see him as having his finger on the button and...the risk of a nuclear attack against us would be elevated.
And the isolationism aspect of Nationalism, like pulling out of NATO and taking a more hostile stance against particular member nations, can create conflicts with "limited" nuclear responses.
Maybe the best hope is that few in the Pentagon would be eager to go along with Trump. They might be able to keep him in check. Give him a dummy code and put someone with a clear head in charge under military command.
He said in 1987 he was lying about Trump.
Why do you believe him now?
.....lying lunatic as their candidate for POTUS.
Why do you believe him now?
......that's another matter entirely. I keep getting asked by friends overseas, if American's are CRAZY enough to elect Trump as POTUS. It is possible, but not likely. Honestly though, this Presidential race should not even be as close as it is?
You are correct about....... this Presidential race should not even be as close as it is.......however hillwhorie is much, much more dishonest than trump in addition to being corrupt, is not respectable, has no honor, etc. etc.
You're welcome
2016 = GOP WH, Senate and House
-- Modified on 7/18/2016 1:42:41 PM
These are the prominent Republican leaders whom you won’t find in Cleveland come Monday
1) Any member of the Bush family: The politicians of the Bush clan, the GOP’s favorite quasi-dynasty, have especially fraught histories with Trump. He has repeatedly accused George W. Bush of lying about the Iraq War. He made piteously light work of Jeb when the former governor tried to challenge him in the primaries. At least in part due to his indecorous treatment of W and Jeb, Trump will be the first Republican nominee not to receive the endorsement of the senior Bush since he left the White House.
2) Two former Republican nominees: Neither Mitt Romney nor John McCain will make an appearance in Cleveland. One of the earliest controversies of the Trump campaign involved the candidate making disparaging comments about McCain’s war record. The Arizona senator has also said Trump has made his reelection campaign this year "the race of my life." The two men haven’t exactly seen eye to eye, though last month McCain extended a hesitant endorsement.
For his part, Romney says he can’t support the real estate tycoon because of his racist and demagogic statements. Bob Dole, the only other living former nominee, will attend the convention.
3) A few of Trump’s former primary opponents: Of the wide field of candidates who ran against Trump in the primary, the majority have fallen in line and endorsed their candidate. As of now, only Marco Rubio and Rand Paul have expressed that they won’t be in attendance. Both are running for Senate reelection, with Rubio's Florida race feasibly having the ability to determine senate control. John Kasich is not currently up for reelection, but it’s unclear what his convention plans are.
4) Republican senators in tight races: Trump is likely to change the lay of the land in quite a few important down-ballot Senate races. Perhaps in order to stave off a "Trump effect" by hemming too closely to the nominee, Sens. Pat Toomey (PA), Kelly Ayotte (NH), Mark Kirk (IL), and Ron Johnson (WI) have either expressed their hesitation or outright stated that they will skip Cleveland.
18 current GOP Senators have said Nyet, no convention this go round.
Republicans who have either hinted or confirmed they will not attend
Sen. Marco Rubio (Florida)
Rep. David Jolly (Florida)
Former Gov. Mitt Romney (Massachusetts)
Gov. John Kasich (Ohio)
Sen. John McCain (Arizona)
Sen. Kelly Ayotte (New Hampshire)
Gov. Brian Sandoval (Nevada)
Gov. Paul LePage (Maine)
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
Former Vice President Dick Cheney
Former first lady Laura Bush
Former first lady Barbara Bush
Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
Sen. Mark Kirk (Illinois)
Former Gov. Tom Ridge (Pennsylvania)
Former Sen. Tom Coburn (Oklahoma)
Former Gov. Luis Fortuño (Puerto Rico)
Former Gov. Bobby Jindal (Louisiana)
Former Gov. Sarah Palin (Alaska)
Rep. Trey Gowdy (South Carolina)
Rep. Mark Sanford (South Carolina)
Rep. Sean Duffy (Wisconsin)
Sen. Lindsey Graham (South Carolina)
Sen. Ron Johnson (Wisconsin)
Sen. Dean Heller (Nevada)
Sen. Jeff Flake (Arizona)
Former Gov. Jeb Bush
Former President George W. Bush
Former President George H.W. Bus
Do you see libs here talk positively about HRC? They did about Obama. A lot. But not HRC.
All the energy on the Dem side is "ABT". Anybody but Trump.
I don't sense any pro-Hillary sentiment here or with my close friends that are Dems/Libs.
She is a lying, completely hypocritical and delusional POS.
There really is no getting around that fact.
.......named Trump as their candidate with even worse negative approval ratings than her. Way to go guys.....lol
All the energy on the Dem side is "ABT". Anybody but Trump.
I don't sense any pro-Hillary sentiment here or with my close friends that are Dems/Libs.
She is a lying, completely hypocritical and delusional POS.
There really is no getting around that fact.
If you mean the "truth" about her, then yeah.
Hillary has been the "heir apparent" ever since before anyone outside of Chicago had ever heard of Obama. The only one responsible for her lack of credibility is Hillary herself. Way to go Dems.