Politics and Religion

And then the truth
Dr.Hackenbush 96 reads
posted


END OF MESSAGE

Dr.Hackenbush88 reads

So when you hear a prosecutor claim he and his grand jury or prosecution are “going after” their targeted person that statement automatically negates or disproves all evidence put forward by anyone. Right. Contrary to your implication this Congressman is not a member of the Benghazi committee but of course reading actual documents isn’t required to form an opinion.

"So when you hear a prosecutor claim he and his grand jury or prosecution are “going after” their targeted person that statement automatically negates or disproves all evidence put forward by anyone."

And, I thought their purpose was to find to truth, not to prosecute anyone. Silly me! Oh, but what you say goes against what Boehner said: "'This investigation has never been about former Secretary of State Clinton and never will be,' Boehner said in a statement Thursday." Thanks for letting the cat out of the bag, and also for calling Boehner a liar!  ;)

Dr.Hackenbush109 reads

President Nixon. Certainly they were.  

By the present left wing logic, the Watergate hearing should have been ignored by everyone.

I'm beginning to think you received your degree from Trump University!  ;)

Oh, and since you brought it up, would you like to stand Watergate up along side Benghazi as to which was the bigger threat to our two party system? Or, would you like to stand Iran-Contragate up to Benghazi as to which threatened our political system of checks and balances the most, and in which was the greater degree of deception exercised? Or, how about the Iraq war against Benghazi as far as the amount of American treasure in lives lost and money down the drain, along with the greatest degree of dishonesty, and with the greatest the degree of mismanagement and bureaucratic bungling? ;)

Dr.Hackenbush96 reads

Oh wait. I forgot who I was talking to. Nevermind.

I should be the one thanking you and the left here for putting your blind partisianship on display for everyone to observe but then again you really deserve nothing.

-- Modified on 7/2/2016 4:40:38 PM

a group of Republican House members, with a political axe to grind, would be concerned with finding the truth, is the true blind partisan!  ;)

Dr.Hackenbush93 reads

Not that it matters as I’ve clearly demonstrated, you’ve pointed out 2 axe grinders both of which were not even involved in the committee and one of the 2, McCarthy, wasn’t even commenting on the evidence itself but simply making note of the pickle Clinton was in due to the committee’s work. You have zero evidence that I haven’t examined the evidence put forward from the right, the left and elsewhere thus your claim of my partisanship is simply without merit. You and the Left have openly stated a total lack of interest in looking at testimony available. Examine it and debate it. Burying your head in the sand does the biggest disservice to yourselves.

A baseless claim now that I am what you know yourself to be, blind partisian, is nothing more than open dishonesty and a mechanism used by someone that’s run out of arguments, which means you have nothing useful to add to this conversation

points out, there is no bombshell, which most Republicans were hoping for!  ;)

"Gowdy, with slicked gray hair, lavender tie and fitted suit, offered what sounded like an excuse for the absence of a bombshell. 'It is always better to be the first committee to investigate, and it is always better to investigate as contemporaneously to an incident or to an event as can be done,' he said. 'Our committee did not have the luxury of either one of those.'"

Anyone without a political axe to grind could have told him that to begin with. And, I had been paying attention to the previous committee reports, so please forgive me for not finding it a high priority to wade through one more report, where its own chair of the committee is giving excuse as to why there's not much new to report.  ;)

As far as your call for the truth, which truth do you choose, the official report written by the Republicans, the report from the Democrats on the committee, or the one written by Pompeo and Jordan?  ;)

You see, there's facts and there are interpretation of facts. Please don't confuse the two doctor!  ;)

P.S. This whole "the truth" thingy sounds oh so familiar. Who about coming from behind your alias and using your handle. What are you afraid of!  ;)

Dr.Hackenbush75 reads

Posted By: mattradd
As far as your call for the truth, which truth do you choose, the official report written by the Republicans, the report from the Democrats on the committee, or the one written by Pompeo and Jordan?
Maybe you could buy a vowel or something.

You can't even answer my question regarding which report you believe reflects "the truth!" ;)

And, here's a follow-up question: How is the report you choose reveals anything, substantially different, that the previous reports? ;)

Dr.Hackenbush73 reads

Because we all know that in some circles today, feeling good about oneself outweighs knowledge and an understanding of reality.

You don't realize your "truth choice" question is flawed from the start, thus exposing your ignorance and the reason for my previous post.

Register Now!