If you're in NYC or LA, you're looking at like $8 a piece. So to cover those 300 roses, you gonna need a fat stack of Benjamins!
Might wanna use your 1960s VW Vanagon instead of getting that uHaul.
Looks like the price of roses is going up this Valentines Day. According to the Reuters article linked below, a rose can set you back $1.50 to $2 each, making the exchange rate of a rose higher than a pound sterling.
Given that there are various companion ads with a "300 roses" per hour rates, I chuckle at the fleeting thought of bringing some 25 dozen dead flowers (that I just dropped a fistful of Benjamins to buy and the uHaul to deliver them) to a gated apartment and expect to have a good time.
I'm fortunate that all the ladies in my life hate dead flowers.
Just a Friday PSA.
ga_kosh
P.S. - I know the ladies mean 1 rose = 1 USD/$, but still...
If you're in NYC or LA, you're looking at like $8 a piece. So to cover those 300 roses, you gonna need a fat stack of Benjamins!
Might wanna use your 1960s VW Vanagon instead of getting that uHaul.
Glad I live in the ATL.
Harry
$8/rose x 300 roses/ hour is $2400/hr. Not sure if there's much a market for that.
Hell, for $2400/hr, I'm sure there's a few hobbyists who wouldn't mind 'working' part-time!
ga_kosh