Politics and Religion

Guns have always been a part of our culture, mass murders have not
GaGambler 137 reads
posted

Maybe that is something YOU should think about?

I see you repeatedly ducked Jack's question about what law might have prevented this?

followme163 reads

Target the most peaceful defenseless people because they are peaceful and defenseless people and the shooter is a fucking coward, looking to kill as many as possible with the least resistance. aka soft target.    



-- Modified on 6/12/2016 8:55:20 AM

FatVern134 reads

The shooter sounds like he was hired by the left.

followme106 reads

take a swipe at the lefties any time I can but you are one DUMB FUCK with that stupid ignorant comment.

You sound just like laffy (aka backstabber jr), fg  backstabber and choosy when they blame the right by making stupid ignorant accusations.

You're Fucking Welcom

brooks582 reads

and doesn't know how to agree with those agreeing with him

I suspect reading comprehension issues coupled with native hostility

At you and it clearly hit home and hit hard.

You're more than welcome

FatVern88 reads

The guntakers are going to have a field day with this one

brooks5104 reads

and it ain't those damn "thumpers" that libs so hate - never is

will the President finally have the stones or honesty to call it "radical islam" this time or is he going to try to exploit this horror to try to disarm whitey again (my guess)?  perhaps the shooter was enraged by not being allowed to use the ladies room?

AT LEAST he should denounce islamic homophobia, you know stuff like throwing gays off buildings by ISIS (the child of Barack and Hillary) . . .

yeah, I know - allah akb

FatVern135 reads

The broadcast of these and other murders, is the religion of America.

Really ignorant comment.  Have you ever been to a Muslim country.  You must listen to talk radio.  The terrorists are just that terrorists and they are common criminals.  To blame that on Muslims is just stupid.  In 2014 the murders in the U.S. Totaled about 14,000 +/-, so the Muslims are no where near killing that many citizens as we are doing a better job ourselves.  Go back to talk radio.

brooks595 reads

me bad.  led and ended with insult

libs do that when they have no case, fucking nothing, but feel the predictable lib irresistible need to speak

it ain't the Baptists doing this here pal.  

Deny all you want but those ISLAMISTS will kill you as fast as they can and would if they could.  but then, who would apologize for them?

they need crushed

 
-- Modified on 6/12/2016 12:30:45 PM

-- Modified on 6/12/2016 12:31:14 PM

As inevitable as death & taxes.

Posted By: DoctorGonzo

Now where's that cyanide pill ?

Posted By: ROMMEL
If Obama had a son, he'd be gay.

and of course Hillary will be doing the same thing.

Obama will be every bit as tasteless and stupid as Trump "as inevitable as death and taxes" to borrow a phrase.

GaGambler138 reads

Maybe that is something YOU should think about?

I see you repeatedly ducked Jack's question about what law might have prevented this?

You come to your own conclusions, not for me to tell you what to do, come to the answers yourself.

The mass shooting phenomena started in '66 with the Charles Whitman killings on the University of Texas, where 16 were killed. Is the year 1966 a clue ? You tell me.

So lemme get this straight & correct me if I'm wrong about this : shit like this will continue to happen & no way to stop it ? Am I reading you right ?

while of course ducking any inconvenient questions asked of you at the very same time.

I eagerly await your answer to what law could have prevented this crime.

Somehow I think I will be waiting quite a while.

Jumping to conclusions, again GaG ? Seems to be a persistent pathology with you.

As for laws in this situation, they're controlled & quashed by the NRA. They weren't worked up by 32 school kids getting offed, think they give a shit about 50 Orlando gays buying it ? Get real. What laws could be passed with a "mindset" like that ?! Rhetorical question. Let the NRA membership wrest with their own consciences, that is, if they have a conscience, which is severely in doubt, at this moment.

Posted By: GaGambler
while of course ducking any inconvenient questions asked of you at the very same time.  
   
 I eagerly await your answer to what law could have prevented this crime.  
   
 Somehow I think I will be waiting quite a while.

GaGambler108 reads

This country has been very well armed since it's inception. Mass murders are a relatively recent phenomenon.  

If it's the gun that's at fault, or the NRA that's at fault, how do explain generation after generation of law abiding gun owners not picking up their weapons to slaughter each other en masse?

If you want to get into a stupid debate of "cause and effect" it "could" be argued that firearms laws passed in 1968 caused mass murders using your convoluted logic, since the "mass murder" era according to you started in 1966.

If, God forbid, you had a close relative killed in a assault rifle mass murder spree , would you feel differently ? Rhetorical question. Why did I even bother fucking answering it ?  All boils down to selfishness & how you feel about your fellow Americans. We're all in it together, but for too many, like they give a shit about murdered schoolkids or gays in a nightclub? No, it's all Social Darwinism, everyone out for themselves.  Pathetic.

You really are so fucking predictable and your arguments so fucking weak. No wonder you used to used those insipid GIF's to try to make your points for you. Your ability to "debate" without them (or with them) is seriously lacking. I guess it doesn't help that you take the wrong side of almost every issue too.

I give you facts, irrefutable facts and you try making an emotional, but irrelevant argument because you have nothing else. I agree, PATHETI

As somebody who's known you for a long time, seek help ASAP.

Posted By: GaGambler
You really are so fucking predictable and your arguments so fucking weak. No wonder you used to used those insipid GIF's to try to make your points for you. Your ability to "debate" without them (or with them) is seriously lacking. I guess it doesn't help that you take the wrong side of almost every issue too.  
   
 I give you facts, irrefutable facts and you try making an emotional, but irrelevant argument because you have nothing else. I agree, PATHETIC  
   
   
   
 

Tell that to Native Americans.....

See A Jackson, Custer, etc......

Posted By: GaGambler
Maybe that is something YOU should think about?  
   
 I see you repeatedly ducked Jack's question about what law might have prevented this?

That's because it would a bit difficult to do a mass shooting with a single shot musket.

You mean like you are doing on this and other threads.

 
You're Welcome
In Welchers We Distrust

Register Now!