Write Review
1,891,329 Total Reviews 3,560 New Reviews
9,361 Users Online

Politics and Religion

But THAT'S the point Jake is making.
JackDunphy 64 reads
posted

These two are ground breakers, not intent on following the old, tired, ways of the past, or the establishment. They are saying FU to precedent in a loud way.

That is why so many people have flocked to these 2 men. Surely, you can see that.

Hills, once again, is showing she is firmly entrenched in the establishment that many people have now grown to despise.

And don't knock "entertainment value." Remember Nixon went on "Laugh In" and Clinton played the sax on late night TV?

Entertainment can affect politics, and therefore votes, and politicians have known this for years.

JakeFromStateFarm465 reads

Never would have happened before.  These are two of the most unconventional politicians ever

Related Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/us/politics/donald-trump-bernie-sanders-debate.html?&...

ReplyQuoteReport
JackDunphy81 reads

Hills is going to concede the national stage to her opponent and the Republican Primary Winner. WTF is right Jake.

This makes Bern look brave, fearless, new school and vibrant and makes her look frightened, detached, establishment and out of touch.

Major bit of stupidity by Clinton Inc, especially if Bern wins Cali.

Wow...

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd67 reads

latest news cycle. The headline read: "Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders Contemplate a Debate." Do you see the word "contemplate"?

"Hillary Clinton has declined an invitation to debate Senator Bernie Sanders before the California primary election next month, but he may have found a willing replacement: Donald J. Trump." Did you read "may?"

And, the invitation from Bernie is passed on though Kemmel on national TV. Sounds like things are totally solidified, right?  ;)

If Hilliary debates Bernie, it makes it look like she agrees with him that he still has a chance in winning the nomination. Why in the world would she want to play his game?  ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
JackDunphy67 reads

If they debate, and both sides have agreed to, just working out logistics, it would make Hills look irrelevant. A cast off. Meaningless.

And if it is as you say, why did she debate him the last time? Or the time before that? Didn't those debates give the appearance that he still has a chance in winning the nomination? What would make THIS debate so different?

Your logic breaks down.

And when you factor in just the latest about her email/server scandal, it will seem like she is hiding. Again. But the lib media is now dogging her (see attached)

Hills is a horrible candidate, mired in scandal, whose candidacy is limping to the finish line, damaged by a self described old, white Jewish Socialist and the fact she just cant follow guidelines and rules about national security!

Yeah she sounds like she would make a great president! LOL

Related Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-inexcusable-willful-disregard-for-the-...

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd53 reads

I bet whatever charities are named to benefit, don't!  Just ask the Vets!  ;)

And, any network would pay the cost is not concerned about the democratic process! The whole thing would be based on purely entertainment value. Is there any historical precedent where a presidential nominee in one party debated a losing candidate for the presidential nominee of the other party. I'm not aware of one.   ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
JackDunphy65 reads

These two are ground breakers, not intent on following the old, tired, ways of the past, or the establishment. They are saying FU to precedent in a loud way.

That is why so many people have flocked to these 2 men. Surely, you can see that.

Hills, once again, is showing she is firmly entrenched in the establishment that many people have now grown to despise.

And don't knock "entertainment value." Remember Nixon went on "Laugh In" and Clinton played the sax on late night TV?

Entertainment can affect politics, and therefore votes, and politicians have known this for years.

ReplyQuoteReport
JakeFromStateFarm63 reads

I think Hillary would make a better President than she does a candidate.  I will also agree that's debatable.

ReplyQuoteReport
DoctorGonzo120 reads

... could this really be the beginning of the end

Related Link: Welcome to the New Age

ReplyQuoteReport
quadseasonal63 reads

With the evil woman losing more  support every day, a Trump Sanders debate would be her next bad nightmare.
   
   Her talking points are weaker than her record.
  For the last week all she's doing is flailing, obsessively asking for  Trump's tax records.

  Her advisors are way off track advising Mrs. Evil Naive, a certified master of withholding  documents, to press Trump to release his.
 
That's not in the top ten list of issues at hand with Trump supporters, regardless how much the left wing media or she wants it to be.
 
  I'd put it on par with 99 % of President Obama's  supporters, hoping to see his College transcripts. Zilch!  
   
  There's  no way President Trump will release any tax records when she's  demanding them.
 She's not smart enough to realize, while he's playing her like the fool she is,  he's in charge, not her.  
 
     I scoff at the insolence of the  ignorance of her thought process, and facts at hand, when she speaks of women's rights.
  Every time she brings up her support for women I think of her enabling her predator in power, husband.
 
  If her pandering to Black's doesn't simmer soon, I suspect she will turn off much of their support.  
       

 

 

 
 

Posted By: JakeFromStateFarm
Never would have happened before.  These are two of the most unconventional politicians ever.  
 
Related Link: http://www.vox.com/2016/1/12/10749984/hillary-clinton-pander

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd54 reads

I'll believe it when I see it!  ;)

Related Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-bernie-sanders-debate_us_574746c2e4b03...

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!