Politics and Religion
One gringo President lied causing 4500 dead troops plus 32,000 wounded, no biggie huh?
saltyballs
posted
No real surprise really. And, I wonder why the Clinton's believe in a vast right wing conspiracy! 
No real surprise really. And, I wonder why the Clinton's believe in a vast right wing conspiracy!
.....the GOP establishment seems determined to destroy their party by denying Trump the nomination.
No real surprise really. And, I wonder why the Clinton's believe in a vast right wing conspiracy!
Hillary had to eat her words on the vast right wing conspiracy nonsense or did you forget that Bill lied about his porky intern? Lol
Let's see what is in the report, shall we?
Clinton has already lied about Benghazi, a fact Mari has even acknowledged here, so don't go blaming the R's for that for fks sake.
-- Modified on 4/14/2016 10:45:37 PM
Let's see what is in the report, shall we?
Clinton has already lied about Benghazi, a fact Mari has even acknowledged here, so don't go blaming the R's for that for fks sake.
-- Modified on 4/14/2016 10:45:37 PM
How many millions have the Republicans spent to sink the Clinton ship, through all their investigations, like Whitewater, and Ken Starr's investigation. And, where has that gotten them? Other than catching Bill lying about a blow job, just a bunch of egg on their faces. Particularly since Bill ranks higher, by 65 historians, than both Bushes, Ford, and Nixon. Now, I'm not saying Hillary will win, however, if she does, it will be one more time, of a long line of times, major egg has landed on the faces of the Republicans. A just reward for all their failed efforts!
And I think deep down inside, you know it.
Republicans Admit Benghazi Committee Was Designed To Go After Hillary Clinton
Two Congressmen And Ex-Benghazi Committee Staffer Admit Partisan Nature Of The Committee. Since September 29, three credible Republicans have admitted to the partisan nature of the House Select Committee on Benghazi and its primary goal of tarnishing Hillary Clinton. While the first admission may have been inadvertent -- House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) boasted that the committee had achieved its goal of damaging Clinton's poll numbers during an interview with Fox News about his candidacy for House Speaker -- since then, former Benghazi committee staffer Bradley F. Podliska and a second Republican congressman, Rep. Richard Hanna (R-NY), have come forward and admitted the committee was "designed to go after" Clinton.
Two Congressmen And Ex-Benghazi Committee Staffer Admit Partisan Nature Of The Committee. Since September 29, three credible Republicans have admitted to the partisan nature of the House Select Committee on Benghazi and its primary goal of tarnishing Hillary Clinton. While the first admission may have been inadvertent -- House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) boasted that the committee had achieved its goal of damaging Clinton's poll numbers during an interview with Fox News about his candidacy for House Speaker -- since then, former Benghazi committee staffer Bradley F. Podliska and a second Republican congressman, Rep. Richard Hanna (R-NY), have come forward and admitted the committee was "designed to go after" Clinton.
-- Modified on 4/15/2016 4:24:18 PM
Related Link: Benghazi
I am sure you cant.
As did Hillary, Bill, Gore, Tony Blair, George Tenet, etc...Good lawd! Its a God damn conspiracy! That crossed party lines and the Atlantic Ocean! LOL
Go see what Lawrence O'Donnell has said about the Bush lying nonsense. I have linked his comments here several times in the past. I'll give you a hint. You wont like it. LOL
But that would have to make you be objective on the issue.
I am sure you cant.
Go see what Lawrence O'Donnell has said about the Bush lying nonsense. I have linked his comments here several times in the past. I'll give you a hint. You wont like it. LOL
But that would have to make you be objective on the issue.
I am sure you cant.
While that Resolution did indeed authorize President Bush, under strict requirements of the 1973 War Powers Act, to use force, Section 3(b) of the Act also required that sanctions or diplomacy be fully employed before force was used, i.e. force was to be used only as “necessary and appropriate in order to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,” and to do so only upon the President certifying to Congress that “diplomatic or other peaceful means” would be insufficient to defang Saddam.