But the guys are doing the ratings, who else is to be blamed?
Why do you men/women give these massage girls that do absolutely nothing but jerk you off the highest possible score for a massage. Are you that lame and lonely that you have no expectation other than being in the company of a naked lady, regardless if she is hot or not. I have gone to see some of these providers, well actually I see a lot of them, but you all give 7's to these ladies for the bare minimum. Meanwhile, you have ladies that are very outgoing, that allow daty or p-play on the inside, and a number of other things that are being rated a seven as well. Just because you get a peck on the lips doesn't make them great!!! I hope you are not that lame or needy, if you should think about bettering yourself so you are not so easily impressed by the least bit of attention. Or maybe you are the a**hole!! Lmao jk come gents have some standards!!
-- Modified on 6/10/2015 9:46:28 AM
Years ago 7 or 8 was considered good now u got girls that complain about 8 because guys think they aren't good if they are under 9. I think it should just be judged off the content in the review not the number scale
Used to be a whole lot more ymmv. The economics have changed quite a bit though
and most guys aren't going to want to spend 3 bills plus for a 7 in appearance or a 7
in performance. The girls know the ratings game and how to play it.
Girls kissing, allowing DATY or doing anything other than bodywork/prostate massage and simple happy endings are escorts. I don't think massage and escort should be the same category of review at all. But as far as you're complaining about what others think and write - get over yourself, trying to control other folks and their opinions or the fact that they use the system in place is ridiculous. The problem is using numbers - it's subjective, always has been and always will be. The system is flawed in this aspect, not the people using it.
-- Modified on 6/10/2015 10:56:52 AM
I basically agree that massage girls are overrated and overvalue their time and efforts. Some want the same money as many of the reviewed backpage escort girls. Many of us use them because it's safe and not really subject to much LE attention.
But - your attitude is ridiculous and unnecessary. These days I find that all the ratings are off. An 8 rating looks, escort or massage, used to be incredible. Now I see girls with 8's that I wouldn't give a second glance at in the mall. Stringy, bad skin, etc. Don't blame just the FBSM guys.
But the guys are doing the ratings, who else is to be blamed?
I agree. It's on us.
Thank you for the replies, I appreciate the different point of views. They are very subjective but the ratings should be comparable to what actually took place during the session. My issue isn't the looks ratings but rather the performance. I see a lot of reviews that received 8's or higher because they got a lfk. I don't spend three bills on a fbsm either but there are many quality providers out there for half of that. I just feel like because she is cute and touch your body, doesn't mean they deserve a 7 or higher. The better the integrity of the scores helps to provide a better service for us all and gives the providers a true idea of what a top notch performance is. Sorry if I offended but some have to do a better job of accessing when they service was above and beyond the call of duty.
My understanding is that you are only allowed to rate up to a 7 for standard stuff. So, if you're rating a fbsm provider, then you would give a max of 7 for an awesome massage and a great hand job. Points are added for extras like daty, bbbj, and strap on play. Lower rstings are warranted for poor quality of either massafe or ending. Any intercourse (vaginal) throws that provider into the escort category, and new rules start for the ratings. My problem is that some fbsm providers are offering fs, but not advertising it. I think TER should allow for a category change if enough hobbyists are reporting fs. It keeps the rules simple.
That's my two cents.
-- Modified on 6/10/2015 9:46:28 AM
I rate providers be they escorts or massage girls based on more than just their sexual performance. The end result of the act is the same whether it's her hand, pussy or mouth. It's more about how they make me feel during the session that dictates how I will rate them. If I have a comfortable, non-rushed session with an articulate, good natured provider, she will get a higher rating than one that treats it like a business.
I saw a young lady the other night that talked to me before, she was average in looks, pretty in her way, but not drop dead gorgeous. However, her attitude and personality raised her looks in my eyes. She was sexy in a sensual way. She looked me in the eye, held a conversation and made me feel comfortable. She gave a really good massage, with a good combination of teasing and relaxation. The entire experience was great for the entire unrushed hour. In the end, I came when she gave me the happy ending.
I saw an escort a week or two ago, she was young and fairly new to the business, she was cute, beautiful eyes, sexy lips, beautiful hair had a great body and was obviously intelligent. But her attitude and personality dropped her looks in my opinion. From beginning to end I felt like I was a transaction. She was in a rush, gave the bare minimum of foreplay, wanted to fuck and get it over with. In the end, I came.
I paid the same to both providers, the second girl was better looking than the first, but the first made me "feel" like I was the only one. I'm not naive enough to think I am anything more than a transaction to either girl, but the first made me feel like we were having a sexual encounter, the second made me feel like I was buying a watch. So, I rate them on performance, personality, and attitude, as much as I do on looks and the actual "act" that makes me cum.
There are many AMPs especially here in ATL that are FS and GFE. You might want to do your research bud there are way more than happy endings... I wouldnt know but I'm just saying 