With total self awareness that I created one a few threads down......this board has gotten a little stale with all of the ISO requests. Thought I'd pose a question I personally haven't seen discussed here: How accurate are reviews? Apologies in advance if this has been discussed here before.
Hobbyists, if you had a not so great experience, do you accurately describe this in reviews? Personally, if I don't mesh with a provider but she's sweet and delivers as promised, I just won't review her so as not to publicly embarrass or slander her. I just don't feel comfortable doing that unless it's totally warranted. Do other hobbyists do this as well? It would of course lead to providers having a lot more positive reviews than negative ones. On the other hand, if I had a great time, I'll review her with accurately. There are other reasons why a hobbyist might not submit bad reviews, just wondering if my method is widely used. And ladies.......how often do you receive bogus reviews from guys just looking to get VIP statusthen I have found them reliable.
In the few occasions I have seen a gal with only a few reviews, even then they were mostly reliable.
I can only think of one or two which were unreliable.
Those are better odds than going to see a movie based on reviews, IMHO
There is a provider who has a long list of stellar reviews, none of which mention that she is a post-op transexual. TER policy is that if the provider calls herself a woman, then the reviewer must also refer to her as a woman. So, you may go to see an exceptionally well reviewed lady, and be in for a significant surprise. Whether or not you feel this is accurate, well, that's your call.
-- Modified on 6/15/2016 5:36:27 PM