even though the web site satisfied all TER requirements.
What was more frustrating was that after the 1st time review was rejected, I sent an e-mail to support and explained that the web site was valid and it was used by many other reviewers for different girls in the agency. Got an automatic response from support saying the review was in the approval process. 2 days later, the review was rejected with the same reason! I sent another e-mail to support and asked to escalate my case to the next higher level. Only then a senior TER rep approved and posted my review and also apologized for the hassle.
Overall, it took more than 5 days to get a review posted, which had no problems at all! In fact when it was posted, it was exactly the same as when I wrote it originally.
One useful thing I was told by the Sr. rep. was that if a web site does not have an e-mail/phone#, TER reviewers consider it 'bad'. The web site in my case didn't have this information but it had a form to fill in and send.
I had a review denied for a bad website address. I resubmitted it and the original denial came back for the same reason. I can type the address in my browser and it will take me to the correct site. Any Ideas? Edit doesn't come up on the review page.
You're possibly submitting the "general" website address for the escort mall.
(IE: A Snail-mail address may be a UPS mail box store; but it is the individual box# that gets it to your specific recipient)
Try clicking on the individual thumbnail picture of the providers ad on the escort mall. A specific URL for her ad should show up in your top "address bar". copy/paste that URL in the appropriate "website-ad address" TER field.
Hopefully this will cure your problem.
there are 2 primary reasons for the bad website address rejection:
1) The link didn't work when the approver clicked it. This doesn't seem to be problem in your case since you are able to access the site.
2) The link is to her profile on another site that has reviews/field reports/feedback, or requires that you join the site to see her contact details. These are competitors of TER, and it doesn't do TER any good to provide links to the competition. That's just good business!
I know your frustration! Several months ago, I had a great time with a petite South African here on the south coast of England. Unfortunately, I had already learned which sites are acceptable, and which ones aren't, and I couldn't find one that would be accepted.
even though the web site satisfied all TER requirements.
What was more frustrating was that after the 1st time review was rejected, I sent an e-mail to support and explained that the web site was valid and it was used by many other reviewers for different girls in the agency. Got an automatic response from support saying the review was in the approval process. 2 days later, the review was rejected with the same reason! I sent another e-mail to support and asked to escalate my case to the next higher level. Only then a senior TER rep approved and posted my review and also apologized for the hassle.
Overall, it took more than 5 days to get a review posted, which had no problems at all! In fact when it was posted, it was exactly the same as when I wrote it originally.
One useful thing I was told by the Sr. rep. was that if a web site does not have an e-mail/phone#, TER reviewers consider it 'bad'. The web site in my case didn't have this information but it had a form to fill in and send.