Politics and Religion

Trump's Iowa loss could easily become a win.
quadseasonal 27 Reviews 195 reads
posted

IMO, when Trump stated,  President Trump  won't do anything about abortion, he lost  
Iowa.
   From corn field to corn field across vast and desolate plains, Iowa caucus  voters  were told by their  priests, preachers and choir directors, gather your flock, support  God, vote for Ayatollah Cruz.

  Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan also lost in the Iowa caucuses.
   
  What I find surprising about the Iowa votes,  with nowhere near the organization as the Hillary machine, Bernie Sanders virtually tied the old crazy lady, destroying her  inevitability.
   
   
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3297715/Hillary-Clinton-squirms-awkwardly-stage-30-minutes-Black-Lives-Matter-protesters-shut-speech-intended-boost-support-black-community.html
   
Posted By: hpygolky
Trump will win NH and SC and Iowa will be what it is, a corn field in the middle of nowhere, forgotten. Look at past GOP winners....gone and vanished.

Let's imagine that there is a number of journalists, commentators and the like hired to cover stories. Their employers hired them for their skills, and those employers don't want them to just set on their butts, or plant themselves on a bar-stool some place. There's nothing much to cover so they are sent to an Iowa corn field, in the middle of winter. Now, journalists and commentators need to do what they are paid for, so what do you end up getting? Perhaps what it means that there is only three inches of snow in the field they are covering, several miles outside of Des Moines vs. the five inches being reported in a field outside of Dubuque? Or, commentary and reporting regarding the change in temperature, especially if it is a sudden unexpected change, or in the opposite direction predicted by the National Weather Bureau. In other words you get something manufactured out of very little, or nothing, really.

My point is, it is much the same as the reporting and commentaries about last night's Iowa caucus's. It  may be quite fun reading the spin going both ways on the same results, but what a waste of time. A lot of people are being paid to say something that will catch your eye, and hopefully keep you engaged long enough to read the story, but much of what they have to say it based on little or no substance at all. ;)

TwoMints189 reads

His problem is that he had to sell out his religiousness to win in Iowa. That level of piety doesn't play well in many other states.
To me it was a bit grotesque. No different then the last two guys. It also proves to the nation that we don't need those billions wasted on ethanol subsidies anymore.  

 
Trump didn't even set up a ground game for Iowa because he believed he didn't have much of a shot early on. Some of the areas didn't even get a Trump Representative.  So he finishes Second gets 1 less delegate.  

As someone else keeps pointing out, I do harbor some believe that he really doesn't want it that bad. Certainly not as bad as Cruz and Rubio. Though that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Should we really want someone to lead the country that is hell bent on doing so?

Trump had a 4.7 lead over Cruz, in the polls, the day before the Iowa caucus. He has a 22.2 point lead over him in New Hampshire, and 16.3 lead in South Carolina. That may be too steep a climb with so little time left.

Register Now!