Politics and Religion
Yes, because People Magazine is such an in-depth and revealing journalistic endeavor...
... now granted it does not mean the claim is false, but it would certainly make for a more (wait for it) "fair and balanced" report were it to include the opposing perspective, instead of being written by a Megan sycophant.
In the classic movie, The Big Chill, People magazine is best explained:
People magazine has only one editorial rule. You can't write anything longer than it takes your average person to take an average crap. Every article can be read in the can. You can read Dostoevsky in the can, but you can't finish it in one sitting.
You'll have to do better, 30 (that's a journalism pun you probably won't get)
In the classic movie, The Big Chill, People magazine is best explained:
People magazine has only one editorial rule. You can't write anything longer than it takes your average person to take an average crap. Every article can be read in the can. You can read Dostoevsky in the can, but you can't finish it in one sitting.
You'll have to do better, 30 (that's a journalism pun you probably won't get)
This is funny and I believe her too.