Politics and Religion

Supporting anarchy and Civil war in Syria was not Bush's idea.
quadseasonal 27 Reviews 313 reads
posted

I don't recall President Bush supporting "moderate"  terrorists and Civil war in Syria.
     

The most  naïve player in  war and peace  policy  and negotiating rooms  is John Lurch Kerry.  

http://www.straitstimes.com/world/middle-east/us-secretary-of-state-john-kerry-warns-isis-that-its-days-are-numbered-after

   I'm definitely not a Trump for President supporter though I see why he has a large base.  
    America  is in need  of  a President who'll fire failures and fix broken American policies, without blaming  problems along the way to successes, on his predecessor.  
   

   
Posted By: ed2000
Obama appears to believe there is no nexus of ownership from President to President. If a previous president breaks something, his successor also owns it. Now it is also highly possible that by walking away from Iraq Obama thought that would "fix it." If true, that just makes him incredibly stupid. His stupidity was demonstrated (or maybe is was just pure political motivation) that just yesterday morning he publicly announced that ISIS has been contained.

I had an interesting conversation at work today. A coworker (who's quite conservative) starts going off on how horrible Obama is because apparently it's his fault that ISIS hit Paris. Now, despite what I say here on the ole P&R, talking about politics tends to be frowned upon in my office. I find it best to basically make short non-committal remarks like, "eh. what can ya do?" whenever the subject comes up. But for whatever reason, today my coworker decided, fuck it, it's Friday, today is the day where I get to talk shit about Obama because ISIS hit Paris.  

Normally, I approach such things with as much humor as I can. I thought of being a smart ass and asking, "wait, Obama is President of France too?" But just as my coworker thought, fuck it, it's Friday, I felt the exact same way.  

I told my coworker, "you know who should be blamed for this? George Dubya Bush." I explained to my coworker that all the fuck way back in 2002, Colin Powell laid out the Pottery Barn Rule. If you break it, you fucking own it. ISIS never would have existed if Dubya hadn't invaded Iraq and occupied the place while the place turned into a bigger piece of shit than it already was. Without the invasion of Iraq, you'd have no ISIS. And without ISIS, the attack on Paris never would have happened.  

7 years out of office, and that fucking cowboy idiot is still getting people killed.

nuguy46298 reads

u r a one-trick pony. Is there nothing negative that Bush is not responsible for?

......to heart.  "Fool me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again" G.W.Bush

Posted By: nuguy46
u r a one-trick pony. Is there nothing negative that Bush is not responsible for?

Saddam being removed is just another thing contributing to the problem but not the cause. You have a general population that is uneducated, very poor, very little hope of making their lives better. Terrorism and religious fanatics have been on going there for decades, centuries if really want to look at it. Think to yourself if ISIS existed during Saddams reign would he have done anything to stop them? I doubt it if they weren't threatening his power. He didn't try to remove terrorist training camps that were there so why would Isis be treated differently?  
         Are the French attacks Obama s fault? No. I ll maintain what I be said before, individuals or small groups willing to die  to kill and create chaos are almost impossible to stop. our thoughts are too black and white on many of these situations. We couldn't stop it in Vietnam, Russia couldn't stop it in Afghanistan, Germany couldn't stop it during ww2 in countries they had millions of military personal and killed civilians at will to surpress them. The Romans at times killed or enslaved whole populations because they couldn't stop it.  
         I feel for everyone in Paris and anyone who lost friends and family. It s really not a time to blame anyone for what happened other than the group directly responsible.  

Posted By: willywonka4u
I had an interesting conversation at work today. A coworker (who's quite conservative) starts going off on how horrible Obama is because apparently it's his fault that ISIS hit Paris. Now, despite what I say here on the ole P&R, talking about politics tends to be frowned upon in my office. I find it best to basically make short non-committal remarks like, "eh. what can ya do?" whenever the subject comes up. But for whatever reason, today my coworker decided, fuck it, it's Friday, today is the day where I get to talk shit about Obama because ISIS hit Paris.  
   
 Normally, I approach such things with as much humor as I can. I thought of being a smart ass and asking, "wait, Obama is President of France too?" But just as my coworker thought, fuck it, it's Friday, I felt the exact same way.  
   
 I told my coworker, "you know who should be blamed for this? George Dubya Bush." I explained to my coworker that all the fuck way back in 2002, Colin Powell laid out the Pottery Barn Rule. If you break it, you fucking own it. ISIS never would have existed if Dubya hadn't invaded Iraq and occupied the place while the place turned into a bigger piece of shit than it already was. Without the invasion of Iraq, you'd have no ISIS. And without ISIS, the attack on Paris never would have happened.  
   
 7 years out of office, and that fucking cowboy idiot is still getting people killed.

Obama appears to believe there is no nexus of ownership from President to President. If a previous president breaks something, his successor also owns it. Now it is also highly possible that by walking away from Iraq Obama thought that would "fix it." If true, that just makes him incredibly stupid. His stupidity was demonstrated (or maybe is was just pure political motivation) that just yesterday morning he publicly announced that ISIS has been contained.

.......in Iraq are the Kurds. Let the Sunni's and Shia fight for what's left in Iraq. ISIS could have been contained a long time ago, if the West/U.S. had immediately supplied military arms to the Kurds, who are able and willing to fight ISIS. We wasted time trying to appease the idiotic politicians in Baghdad while ISIS went ahead and seized most of our U.S. supplied arms from cowardly Iraqi troops.

I agree, Obama has appeared timid in some of his actions in the Middle East, by trying to lead from behind. This type of action by a U.S. President does not work in the M.E. as we now see portrays weakness. The Israeli's understand this very well

I don't recall President Bush supporting "moderate"  terrorists and Civil war in Syria.
     

The most  naïve player in  war and peace  policy  and negotiating rooms  is John Lurch Kerry.  

http://www.straitstimes.com/world/middle-east/us-secretary-of-state-john-kerry-warns-isis-that-its-days-are-numbered-after

   I'm definitely not a Trump for President supporter though I see why he has a large base.  
    America  is in need  of  a President who'll fire failures and fix broken American policies, without blaming  problems along the way to successes, on his predecessor.  
   

   

Posted By: ed2000
Obama appears to believe there is no nexus of ownership from President to President. If a previous president breaks something, his successor also owns it. Now it is also highly possible that by walking away from Iraq Obama thought that would "fix it." If true, that just makes him incredibly stupid. His stupidity was demonstrated (or maybe is was just pure political motivation) that just yesterday morning he publicly announced that ISIS has been contained.

........and will completely destroy Iraq and Lebanon in short order.

"Obama appears to believe there is no nexus of ownership from President to President."

I don't see that as being the issue, but rather Obama recognizing Iraq's sovereignty.

-- Modified on 11/14/2015 4:42:02 PM

Register Now!