A pawn yes, but will sacrificing a mere pawn possibly protect Queen Hillary? I seriously doubt it. More likely it will just be one more nail in her political coffin.
It's funny how the dim witted arm of the left wing things it's the GOP that wants to "do in" Hillary Clinton. It's not the right she has to worry about, it's her own ex boss and her husband that's going to take her down. The biggest issue I see for the dems is "who is going to step up and pick up the torch" I have to say it's most likely going to be Joe Biden as weak as he is. I just can't see Kerry who looked SO FUCKING BAD against GW possibly being trusted by the party to run again. Similar to Romney who deservedly got no support this time out either. Besides Biden, who is left? Sanders is never going to get a bit of support from the people who count, Webb is a pipe dream IMO, despite the fact that I think he'd do a decent job and could get a lot of Reps to cross party lines to vote for him. but the realist in me admits he doesn't have a prayer. My money is on Joe, even though I think he will make a lousy candidate and if elected an even worse POTUS.this is not gong away.
2016 = GOP WH, Senate and Hous
They guy was like 25 when he set up the server 6-7 years ago. For him to take the barrage of questions from a republican led committee that could twist his word around and probably make him look foolish wasn't a good strategy
and of course the "court of public opinion" has every right to believe that Clinton is looking guiltier and guiltier about "everything"
Not all of this is just an objective look at the facts of course, a lot of it is the fact that "she looks and acts like a guilty person" and she is rapidly losing whatever trust the American people ever had in her.
I will repeat my offer to the Hillary fans, I will book as much action as you care to wager against her winning the nomination, and I will give better than current odds, currently at -500, I am prepared to offer -300 for anyone who still believes that Hillary is a shoo in for POTUS. For the record these odds are not for her to be elected POTUS, all she has to do is win the nomination for me to pay off. Any takers???
One last thing about the Hildabeast. I don't think all of this is coming from the GOP, I personally believe Obama does not want Hillary to succeed him as POTUS, and I further believe that he is working behind the scenes to sabotage her run, but is being very careful not to be overt about it.
Yes of course he does, and I'm sure he was informed by hillwhorie and or one of her thugs...oooos i mean lawyers that saying anything that may or will hurt hil will hurt him more. He means nothing to her, he is just a lackey who is disposable as is most of her staff.
The guy is in a tough place.
The truth and she throws him under the bus.
caught lying and he goes under another bus.
Getting involved, in any way, in the clinton crime ring can be very dangerous.
Thank You
2015 = 28
-- Modified on 9/4/2015 1:16:14 PM
...two key figures in the Iran-Contra scandal, invoked their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination in their appearances before congressional committees. Did Reagan's lawyers threaten these brave military officers? Were they just disposable lackeys? Did Reagan throw them under the bus? Did you criticize them at the time? Were they doing it For God and Country?
Your great Republican Governor, Rick Scott, took the 5th Amendment 75 times when he was CEO of Columbia/HCA. He oversaw the largest fraud in Medicare history and the company paid a record $1.7 BILLION in fines. Got any problems with that?
The same will most likely be said about Clinton.
I doubt anyone really cares about this Brian Pagliano, and he most likely won't even be a trivia question in the future, but this appears to be yet another hit on Hillary's credibility, at a point where she already has huge issues in that regard.
Personally, I think she is toast already, and as a betting man I say the smart money is on our "Crazy Uncle Joe" to be the Democratic nominee, and I think that is just what Obama wants. It's no surprise he hasn't come out and said a single positive word about Hillary, or any of the other declared Dem nominees. As you know I think Obama makes a lousy POTUS, but I have never said he was not a shrewd politician. I think once again Obama keeps Clinton from winning the White House.
Depending on what happens over the next few months, I may have to make good on my word and vote for Laffy for POTUS. Right now the chances of anyone from either side of the aisle that I can stand winning their party's nomination seem rather slim to me. I have to admit that as weak as I think Obama is, Jeb is looking even weaker to me. No one wants a spineless Commander in Chief and if Jeb can't stand up to Trump, how the fuck is he going to stand up the the mullahs or Putin?
A pawn yes, but will sacrificing a mere pawn possibly protect Queen Hillary? I seriously doubt it. More likely it will just be one more nail in her political coffin.
It's funny how the dim witted arm of the left wing things it's the GOP that wants to "do in" Hillary Clinton. It's not the right she has to worry about, it's her own ex boss and her husband that's going to take her down.
The biggest issue I see for the dems is "who is going to step up and pick up the torch" I have to say it's most likely going to be Joe Biden as weak as he is. I just can't see Kerry who looked SO FUCKING BAD against GW possibly being trusted by the party to run again. Similar to Romney who deservedly got no support this time out either. Besides Biden, who is left? Sanders is never going to get a bit of support from the people who count, Webb is a pipe dream IMO, despite the fact that I think he'd do a decent job and could get a lot of Reps to cross party lines to vote for him. but the realist in me admits he doesn't have a prayer. My money is on Joe, even though I think he will make a lousy candidate and if elected an even worse POTUS.