I think Obama has intentionally set the Hildabeast up for failure. There has never been any love lost between Obama and the Clintons and what better way to sabotage her 2016 run than having her working for him, and getting all the dirt on transgressions that he may have given his overt or tacit approval for at the time?
Now let's further ask what would be the best way to continue the "Obama legacy" Would he rather have the first black POTUS followed by the first woman POTUS? Or would he rather have his policies continued by his VP, and throw all of his weight behind "Crazy Uncle Joe" right at the height of Hillary's legal problems?
Joe Biden is currently a ten to one pick for POTUS, and while I certainly don't want to see him as POTUS, I am thinking about maybe putting down ten grand on him to win it all, knowing that if the GOP nominates a winning candidate (not that I see any real winners expect maybe Kasich, who won't win the nomination) I can always hedge my bet in the GE.
On a related note, any of you die hard Hillary supporters who are CERTAIN she is going to get the nod. The betting odds on her winning the nomination are -500, I will be happy to take all the action any of you want at -300, anybody feeling lucky.
For the record, I don't think that Joe Biden "beats" Hillary for the nomination, I think Hillary loses it all on her own and Joe just steps in and fills the void with 100% backing of the Obama camp. and "IF" the economy is doing well a year from now, any Dem should coast in for victory against virtually any Rep unless someone from that side of the aisle catches on fire.
... as to whether or not he intentionally set up HRC for failure... who knows? does it really matter? Those two have been at odds since 2008, and I'm still convinced that the only reason Hillary was even put on the Obama cabinet was because of a backroom deal to garner her support in the GE.
I don't know, nor do I really care at this point... not since O'Malley unloaded both barrels at the DNC meeting.
Looks like the Dems are developing their own clown car escapade.
Funny how all of a sudden, Trump is looking more and more like a stable alternative to a dysfunctional dynasty election. When is the next generation of Kennedy's going to start showing up?
Now let's further ask what would be the best way to continue the "Obama legacy" Would he rather have the first black POTUS followed by the first woman POTUS? Or would he rather have his policies continued by his VP, and throw all of his weight behind "Crazy Uncle Joe" right at the height of Hillary's legal problems?
Joe Biden is currently a ten to one pick for POTUS, and while I certainly don't want to see him as POTUS, I am thinking about maybe putting down ten grand on him to win it all, knowing that if the GOP nominates a winning candidate (not that I see any real winners expect maybe Kasich, who won't win the nomination) I can always hedge my bet in the GE.
On a related note, any of you die hard Hillary supporters who are CERTAIN she is going to get the nod. The betting odds on her winning the nomination are -500, I will be happy to take all the action any of you want at -300, anybody feeling lucky.
For the record, I don't think that Joe Biden "beats" Hillary for the nomination, I think Hillary loses it all on her own and Joe just steps in and fills the void with 100% backing of the Obama camp. and "IF" the economy is doing well a year from now, any Dem should coast in for victory against virtually any Rep unless someone from that side of the aisle catches on fire.
O'Malley won't even win Maryland.
can I get back with you a day before the Democrat's convention! 
Even though Bernie Sanders is attracting bigger crowds than either Hillary or Trump he is summarily dismissed by cable/network media.
How obvious do they need be that the ENTIRE PROCESS IS RIGGED AND OWNED BY THE BANKS AND CORPORATE OLIGARCHY!!!
In her case it is a "carpet burn"
2016 = GOP All The Way