Not for accusing her of "bad mouthing" a provider that you happen to like, but of saying that she went "behind her back" or was underhanded about it. Say what you want about what she says/said, the truth of the matter is that she said it out loud and for all to see and hear. Nothing about what Sunny did or said was the least bit underhanded as your OP tended to suggest.
Agency owners who trash their former girls who go Indy. I am am aware of this happening this week to a lady with a wealth of reviews who is now going Indy. She is now being trashed behind here back to all of this agencies clients. That is so wrong and is so petty . Just pisses me off.
I would think that you would be eager to "name names"
While the parties involved I am sure "know who they are", many of the rest of us don't. Your post is just like the guy/lady who bitches about a NCNS, but won't share with us who they are bitching about. Care to share???
Mr players, help her out with a review! Even if you have reviewed her before I think her change of status allows for you to. Review her again. I know some agencies are better then others but most dudes go to se the girl.
In the long run if she lives up to her reviews, gives a spirited bbbj, rims. With aplomb and fucks like a little bunny,
The. Drama should pass!
As always don't forget to write a review and have fun.
-- Modified on 6/8/2014 6:18:38 AM
I will be doing a review this week. I have never used agencies so do not want to get into a pissing contest. But I will write a review when I see her this week. Then you all will be able to make your own decision.
"I have never used an agency before so do not want to get into a pissing contest?" Yet her you are torching every agency through a vague and general accusation. You're full if it.
What's her name?
Can you at least tell us if the name of the lady going Indy starts with an "N"?
and not limited to a single agency. Pettiness and jealousy take a back seat to the almighty buck.
I wouldn't get in the middle of this. Daggers don't soar by themselves.
Was it meant for her face to be exposed? When she was working for the agency was her identity hidden? I understand listing her as a "bad provider" but if her facial identity wasn't exposed before, shouldn't it still be kept? For most young girls, this career is optional and many are in school so outing her face is unnecessary. I'm not taking sides but this young girl's face was just outed as a escort. Her face could have been kept blurred but still posted as a "Bad Provider." It just looks bad and spiteful.
Was just on the site planning this weeks schedule and saw that the photo is now replaced with blurred version.
Me personally I think that reflects very highly on Sunny and supports the community high opinion of her.
As the agency owner, she has the right and market expectation to do what she feels is best for her ladies and clients. Therefore if the unknown reasons are strong enough to deserve this action, we should not second guess her motives beyond stated intent. It looks like she took feedback from the board and blurred the picture again demonstrating her willingness to do right thing and be consistent.
Sunny I want to thank you for your contributions to our community. It is never easy to retract from an earlier position, but I think you have made the right calls. First in disclosing the risk, and then being fair and consistent in how you portray your ladies.
Thank you
Great point. I think I have another valid point.. Since I do talk to a few other providers on occasion, I know I'm not crazy for thinking this. If you have apartment or condo incalls that you aren't currently moving to another location (and this gal is a "bad" apple) aren't you worried about your anonymity as far as incalls are concerned now? Bad actions tend to cause bad reactions. Idk you or this gal, but she does have a few friends apparently. Hopefully you thought about you and your gals safety before you plastered her face on your site as a blacklist..??