I am not sure precisly what you are asking.
If my interpretation is correct, your questions are beyond profound.
Are you referring to the question of the incompleteness of Eienstiens Special and General Relativity with the bizzare outcomes of Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Physics, String Theory, in an attempt to find a Unified Theory, otherwise known as the Theory of Everything etc.?
Then answer to question 1 proof of the non existance if a creator is No, that iis impossible.
Answer to Q 2 other demensions is Yes.
Stephen Hawking had foolishly said something to the effect that the creation of this universe did not need God. He reasoned that since time began at the time of the Big Bang, there was no time.
Hence, there was no time for God to work. In response to that proposition, I have to ask the question he does not address and perplexes physics as we think we know it. What was happening before the Big Bang? Professor Kaku also asks that question.
There are an infinite number of multiverses and up to 8 demensions (String Theory at 9 demensions the equations collapse). One can invision multiverses as many bubbles.
As for the Big Bang, it theorizes that all mass in nature was drawn together my massive gravatational attraction. When all mass was pulled together to the size of the head of a pin,
a spectacular explosion occurred expanding outward by almost infinate force greater than the massive gravatitional attraction that pulled it all together.
If true, didn't it take some "time" to bring all that mass together in order to cause the Big Bang? As for the idea of another universe exhists where the Greatest Creator Of All could be, that is a simple idea. Of , course, I can invision God peeking into this universe from a different universe where he can know all and do all. Thiis brings me to the answer to the question why don't scientists
believe in God? Because, they are looking in the wrong place. They are looking at this universe all the while He is over there in another bubble just peeking through.
The other bubbles or multiverses existed and anything could have been there
So the answer to that part is, Yes
Now for the most important question. No one can prove the non existance of God.
One cannot prove a negative. There is much evidence of a creator given the incredible order of the universe. The Athiest must believe he knows everything there ever was or will be known in order to conclude there is no God. Pretty arrogent don't you think.
That is my short answer and that is all I say about that>
How many great inventions of man have evolved, improving their lifespan
and performance, without outside influence and maintenance ?
What is the cause of random mutations altering traits of living entities?
I have heard mutations are necessary for survival of the species.
If that's the answer why have mice not turned into cats overnight?
What caused the Big Bang if there was only emptiness with no sound?
All of a sudden with no guidance, density expanded and exploded is not a
logical answer. IMO That sounds like a Fairy Tale.
What proof can you show there was no Creator of man ?
Do you see a possibility, the greatest inventor of all time, was living in another
dimension and created the Perpetual Universe we know?
I am not sure precisly what you are asking.
If my interpretation is correct, your questions are beyond profound.
Are you referring to the question of the incompleteness of Eienstiens Special and General Relativity with the bizzare outcomes of Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Physics, String Theory, in an attempt to find a Unified Theory, otherwise known as the Theory of Everything etc.?
Then answer to question 1 proof of the non existance if a creator is No, that iis impossible.
Answer to Q 2 other demensions is Yes.
Stephen Hawking had foolishly said something to the effect that the creation of this universe did not need God. He reasoned that since time began at the time of the Big Bang, there was no time.
Hence, there was no time for God to work. In response to that proposition, I have to ask the question he does not address and perplexes physics as we think we know it. What was happening before the Big Bang? Professor Kaku also asks that question.
Furthermore, the state of physics now is there is not only one universe or 3 /4demensions.
There are an infinite number of multiverses and up to 8 demensions (String Theory at 9 demensions the equations collapse). One can invision multiverses as many bubbles.
As for the Big Bang, it theorizes that all mass in nature was drawn together my massive gravatational attraction. When all mass was pulled together to the size of the head of a pin,
a spectacular explosion occurred expanding outward by almost infinate force greater than the massive gravatitional attraction that pulled it all together.
If true, didn't it take some "time" to bring all that mass together in order to cause the Big Bang?
As for the idea of another universe exhists where the Greatest Creator Of All could be, that is a simple idea. Of , course, I can invision God peeking into this universe from a different universe where he can know all and do all. Thiis brings me to the answer to the question why don't scientists
believe in God? Because, they are looking in the wrong place. They are looking at this universe all the while He is over there in another bubble just peeking through.
The other bubbles or multiverses existed and anything could have been there
So the answer to that part is, Yes
Now for the most important question. No one can prove the non existance of God.
One cannot prove a negative. There is much evidence of a creator given the incredible order of the universe. The Athiest must believe he knows everything there ever was or will be known in order to conclude there is no God. Pretty arrogent don't you think.
That is my short answer and that is all I say about that>
claiming to "know" the unknowable without any room for doubt is just as ridiculous as believing in an invisible man in the sky.
I don't reject the possibility, probability actually that "something", some force, some intelligent being, or something else created what we know as the universe. I do reject the ridiculous idea that an all knowing, all powerful, "GOD" that needs to be worshipped and who cares about things as stupid as eating pork, who we fuck, or any of thousands of other stupid stuperstitions (sic) that all religions seem to build into their fairy tales. and while I can't "prove" that they are full of shit, I put about as much stock in them as I do the tooth fairy.
Whatever created the universe, assuming that the universe was "created" and didn't just "become" something I certainly don't stipulate to, although I concede the possibility, any force that powerful would have to be beyond our feeble little human brains ability to comprehend and would probably could only be explained as a God until we evolve a LOT more than we have so far, If creating fairy tales to explain the unexplainable allows certain people who need "more" than this life offers the ability to sleep at night, that's fine, but when these stuperstitions threaten to end life on this planet, wouldn't you agree that saner people need to speak up?
There's nothing more arrogant than assuming that one could actually know the "will of God." While there's contested territory between the two, science and religion are truly separate spheres. Religion (ideally) deals with the unknown, whereas science (ideally) deals with what can be known.
1.) Zero
2.) Radiation
3.) Light
4.) None
5.) No
btw all your questions are tired old tropes endlessly refuted at talk.orgins. you'd be classified as a poop flinging howler monkey.
-- Modified on 6/9/2015 7:24:49 PM