Write Review
1,891,579 Total Reviews 3,530 New Reviews
11,251 Users Online

Politics and Religion

He's a Tea Party Independent Liberal
quadseasonal 27 Reviews 261 reads
posted

Bigot minded doofus  daffy laffy would have a most difficult time wrapping his bird brain mind, around the fact, there are people who agree with some  Tea Party views, without attending their parties,  who are a lot like gagambler,  never anti homosexual, racist,  or any sort of religious guy, but not the kind of person who supports  Government spies,  peering in his window while listening to their phone calls with hookers.  
   
   Idiots like laffy don't understand, everyone in a crowd cheering for the same team, aren't clones like him and BP.
   
   Some girls pick their sport teams by how pretty their uniforms are.

 laffy picks his enemies by their  political and social views that don't agree with his.
   
   Hypocritical of laffy  to act like he supports homosexuals, when he often mocks  others who disagree with him, by referring to Homosexual fun, interjecting his hidden  Homophobia for all to see.  
 Anyone  who  understands   Freud 101 and the subliminal mind, knows exactly what I am talking about .
   
    That laffy boy is one screwed up white dude. I'm sure glad I realize all pasty face  white guys aren't like him.
     
   Nice to see you posting with common sense,  
       It'd be awesome if you could do it again,  sometime soon , without feeling the need to defend your buddy, or stalk JCA.  :-D

    I wish I could stay, I'm at work , break time is over in five minutes.  

    Have a nice day,
       
Posted By: inicky46
In fact, as you pointed out, all your social views are quite Liberal.  You are conservative in your fiscal and foreign policy views.  So you're really a not a classic righty.  More like Liberighty.  Or a Righteral.  You pick. LOL!
-- Modified on 4/20/2015 12:14:15 PM

AliquippaJones1402 reads

which one is preferable--to grow the power and influence of government or protect the rights and economic liberty of the individual?
 Which is better---government dependence or self dependence?
Notice whenever Obama speaks it's always in the collective,words like we,us together,community,the group. He disparages what the individual achieves on his own. Remember his despicable speech where he said if you're successful you didn't do it by yourself,if you have a business you didn't build that? What a jerk.
Leftists like him hate and fear what the individual can do because they prefer them to dependent on government.
Last question---do you realize the more the government grows the more the freedom of the individual shrinks?

ReplyQuoteReport
RRO2610292 reads

The controlling corporate oligarchy and their banks entirely own and control both parties. The contrasting political ethos's have been manipulated and orchestrated to keep John Q Citizen suspicious and hateful of his very neighbor. With Conservatives its done through authoritarianism, prohibition, intolerance and nostalgia. With Liberals it done through regulation, subjugation, political correctness and 'the greater good'. Either way the "citizen" is being herded/brainwashed into lifelong fiscal slavery far removed from "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".        

Posted By: AliquippaJones

 Notice whenever Obama speaks it's always in the collective,words like we,us together,community,the group. He disparages what the individual achieves on his own. Remember his despicable speech where he said if you're successful you didn't do it by yourself,if you have a business you didn't build that? What a jerk.  
 Leftists like him hate and fear what the individual can do because they prefer them to dependent on government.  
 

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd324 reads

Do all righties, like you, think in simplistic black or white terms. Yes, I'm an individual. However, when I became married, my wife and I became a we. We started balancing between what was the good or desire of one or the other of us, and what was the best for both of us. Because there were time when one or the other laid their needs aside, for the moment, we were able to do and attain more than what we could have as individuals. At least that is how I experienced it. When we had children, we were no longer a married couple, but a family. Then the balancing, I previously mentioned became even more complicated. As my membership into larger circles of society increases, my I-ness gets a bit deluted in all the we-ness. A good example was when I got drafted into the armed services. There was a lot of I-ness in the effort I put into my service, but I was draft because I was a part of "We the people." All societies struggle with the tension of I-ness and we-ness. Having a bunch of I's doing just as they please leads to chaos, and having too strong of we-ness can lead to oppressive governments, and possible disasters caused by rampant nationalism run amok. There's some place between black and white, and we as a society are trying to strike the right balance. Too much I-ness is just narcissism, which were are very susceptible to, which is why so many on the right do not truly have an accurate view on what American Exceptionalism means, let alone where the concept came from.  ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
AliquippaJones306 reads

That's the debate---getting the balance right between the person and the state. Take a horizontal line.On the right tip you have anarchy. Keep moving left you'd have libertarians,then Tea Party conservatives,establishment Republicans,moderates in the center,liberals,socialists,and all the way at other end there is totalitarianism---a behemoth,all powerful centralized state.
  I'm on the right side of the line because I believe the state exists to serve the individual,not the other way around.When the left wants to demonize something they put Big in front of it--Big Business,Big Tobacco,etc. I worry about Big government. And I don't want government subsidizing business or corporate welfare That's a perversion of capitalism.

Posted By: mattradd
Do all righties, like you, think in simplistic black or white terms. Yes, I'm an individual. However, when I became married, my wife and I became a we. We started balancing between what was the good or desire of one or the other of us, and what was the best for both of us. Because there were time when one or the other laid their needs aside, for the moment, we were able to do and attain more than what we could have as individuals. At least that is how I experienced it. When we had children, we were no longer a married couple, but a family. Then the balancing, I previously mentioned became even more complicated. As my membership into larger circles of society increases, my I-ness gets a bit deluted in all the we-ness. A good example was when I got drafted into the armed services. There was a lot of I-ness in the effort I put into my service, but I was draft because I was a part of "We the people." All societies struggle with the tension of I-ness and we-ness. Having a bunch of I's doing just as they please leads to chaos, and having too strong of we-ness can lead to oppressive governments, and possible disasters caused by rampant nationalism run amok. There's some place between black and white, and we as a society are trying to strike the right balance. Too much I-ness is just narcissism, which were are very susceptible to, which is why so many on the right do not truly have an accurate view on what American Exceptionalism means, let alone where the concept came from.  ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
nuguy46247 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!