...what you mention. I am one of the vanilla guys. I'm not interested in any of the things you listed. Greek and rimming are the extent of my being edgy.
o I was thinking about something and one thing I am certain is men like variety and with that I was wondering just how much variety you guys like.
So who would say that they would think it were great to have more alternative providers?
Examples:
* Midgets/little people.
* Pregnant providers.
* Fetish Providers.
* Providers who offered things such as toys or prostate play (could go with Fetish).
* Lactating Providers.
* Male providers, perhaps a man who could join in on a session with you and another girl or even provide cuckolding type services (again can go with fetishes).
The list can go on.
I am not asking what type of alternative services you seek really, just if you wish their were more provided?
I think some ladies keep things under the lid so to speak and keep it fairly vanilla, but I think there are some guys out there who want to add a little bit of something to their experience.
What do you say?
Thank you
...what you mention. I am one of the vanilla guys. I'm not interested in any of the things you listed. Greek and rimming are the extent of my being edgy.
If yes, awesome.
And also had a TS girl. She did phenomenally well. Variety is the spice of life.
Now that would be different!
That'd be quite alternative
Well I will work on making it not a pain in the ass to schedule. 
M
Thought about it . . . and no, none of those interest me. In fact, most of that is disgusting, and I try not to think about each of those ideas for too long. BUT, I find as I go through my list, I keep adding things I wasn't into (mostly as an add on or BONUS to my main reason for booking). Maybe when I get older I'll get so bored that some of that will sound more interesting. I say that as someone who has consumed a great deal of porn for a long long time, and I still find most of that unappealing; but after reading about the cheese snorting guy on this board . . . well fuck it, different strokes!
I think fetish is vague, you need to be more specific.
The cuckhold thing is . . . disturbing. I would suggest not crossing your brands. I would not be interested in "normal" providers from an agency that dealt in that kind of alternative. Better to do each as a separate venture. I say that to mean, as a customer that would give me enough pause (and it doesn't take much) that if I were interested in a particular model, I would just put her at the bottom of my list of opportunities. And I don't mean that to say, because I judge that as outside my comfort zone it shouldn't be offered as a service - I'm grateful all the time that there are ladies out there that can be paid to fulfill my deviant fantasies, so it would be a bummer if other pervs out there couldn't find there thing too (let's all be happy); but I would be happier keeping the alternative ... alternative, in a separate agency. Just my thought.
A second thought about mixing up the genres. If you put some of these harder more involved services out there, then I would think the standard provider routine would not mix well. For example, an agency building a reputation for kink, where the providers have elaborate toys and skills, would not mix well with the YMMV type of women that make up 98-99% of the hobby. Not sure that would mix well. I think consistency would be in higher demand for that type of agency
here should be cookies!
My favorite ice-breaker when I meet with a provider who was a Monica-girl is:
"Did you bake cookies?" :
I remember those cookies!
Some other good memories there too!
Ts, pregnant, and bush all are welcomed niches