Sorry if this was covered in the thread and I missed it, but does the provider you are referring to indicate in her ad/site that her pictures are only representative? I know the question is a little silly, because if you noticed that you presumably would not be posting this thread. However, I have seen a number of people who have included that, or a similar enough, caveat, which I think is fair. Similarly, where a TER profile says the pictures are not real but they are representative, there should be no issue. So I think taking steps to have the profile updated and, if it is not something the powers that be take you up on, referring to it in the narrative of a review should be sufficient. Beyond that, there seems no reason to have it impact your review of her appearance or your experience. I guess if it really reduced the quality of your experience, I could see it impacting the latter score, but I don't really see why it should if you would have made the same appointment had you seen her photos instead.
I see a few providers posting fake pictures from the same model in their websites, and still getting top reviews.
I don't understand, I went to one provider and it's was fantastic, but the picture on Her website was somebody else.
This provider didn't need to use that picture, She was stunning, beautiful and perfect body. Her own pictures will be enough.
The true is, I felt cheated in a way, I will never give a review under such circumstances.
Quite honestly why not leave a review if the pics weren't of her? It doesn't matter if she's smoking hot or if you had a fantastic time, fact is the pics were not of her. Now other people who visit her site and see her reviews will see great reviews with "yes it's a real photo", and be in for a nasty surprise.
It doesn't matter how hot she actually is. If I order a burger at a restaurant, I'm expecting a burger, not a steak, doesn't matter how good the steak is.
I find out 4 providers using the same model in their website using my experience, my line of work allow me that, they charge $1200 to $1600 for two hours, very expensive, but I'm in a situation, damm if I do it , damm if I'm not, the providers and the hobbyists will be by my throat calling me all sort of names. I don't need that
Ok, I see the point, I will review it, even if I get blacklisted, I have a very nice relationship with my other providers, the ones with real pictures, they know I'm a gentleman
You should still consider writing a review. I've met several women who use photos that closely resemble their appearance, obscure their face and photoshop out their tattoos for privacy reasons.
All of the above have been noted in the reviews. For the photos, the drop down box has options allowing you to indicate whether the photos are real and whether they closely resemble the lady in question.
In the general write-up you can also allude to the above facts as well.
See, I do not understand. This is a review site, but I always see gents that feel burnt yet refuse to write reviews. And it tends to be ladies with top reviews that are able to slide by. When a lady with less reviews has the same issue there's no big "I'm not sure if I should write a review" post, they just write the review and warn others. This should be the case for all providers, that is the reason you use a review site right? To write reviews? Good or bad? If your not going to write a review about it, why post about it? Not every review will be perfect, but if it is honest then who cares!
Maybe I misunderstood lol. *shrugs shoulders*
Anywho, enjoy the rest of your weekend friends!
Allison48J
You saw a stunningly beautiful provider with a perfect body. She showed you a fantastic time. It sounds like you'll be writing a fantastic review for someone. Rate her beauty and performance, as you actually experienced it... and resist the urge to "penalize" using a review score.
As for the pics, as others have said - simply update her profile and mention it tactfully in your review text
Master, I always appreciate your wisdom, we need more people like you, thank you
Sorry if this was covered in the thread and I missed it, but does the provider you are referring to indicate in her ad/site that her pictures are only representative? I know the question is a little silly, because if you noticed that you presumably would not be posting this thread. However, I have seen a number of people who have included that, or a similar enough, caveat, which I think is fair. Similarly, where a TER profile says the pictures are not real but they are representative, there should be no issue. So I think taking steps to have the profile updated and, if it is not something the powers that be take you up on, referring to it in the narrative of a review should be sufficient. Beyond that, there seems no reason to have it impact your review of her appearance or your experience. I guess if it really reduced the quality of your experience, I could see it impacting the latter score, but I don't really see why it should if you would have made the same appointment had you seen her photos instead.
I know most guys don't have the luxury of creeping the ad boards for years at a time like some of we ladies do (lol), but I see pictures all the time that were being used when I started three years ago. I know some ladies had been using those same pictures for years before I got here too, as I heard it straight from the horses mouth. And it's crazy, because it doesn't seem to matter. They still have plenty of business, even the ones that I've met and literally could not recognize from the pictures. Pictures that showed their faces!
Here's the thing... If the pictures do actually look like her, and all you can say is that her hair is longer so maybe they're old, there's no real harm or foul done. However, that is not the case with a LOT of the women using 3+ year old pictures, and I have to admit it's a little frustrating to see guys not only allow themselves to be ripped off, but actively participating in taking money from another unsuspecting guy and another woman like myself, who has invested tens of thousands of dollars into making sure that she IS fairly represented, and that you won't be disappointed with what you open the door to.
'Cause really, that's what you do when you write a review saying she was great, or post lies on a shill thread, or even just say "Nah, I don't like reviewing...". You paid way too much to be treated like that, lied to and deceived, and so is the next guy. And the women who do go through the trouble of keeping their ad copies up to date, maintaining their figure, updating their portfolios, and doing heavens knows what else to constantly improve their service are left scratching their heads, wondering if THEY are the ones doing something wrong.
She shouldn't "look like her pictures" based on a technicality. It shouldn't be a "yeah, if you smear vaseline over your eyes, and then cock your head to the side, that is definitely her". And you certainly shouldn't be paying someone to hang the picture of their photoshop monster on the headboard to get your through. If you don't start at least reporting that the pictures weren't accurate to these women's profiles, then they are never going to stop ripping any of us off.
Remember the saying that kind of goes "you teach people how to treat you"? Don't teach the rest of us that we should be saving all the money we spend trying to reassure you that we'll be showing up..
You're 100% right, honest providers pay a lot of money for lingerie, makeup, the location and the photographer, this 4 providers I'm talking about I believe they are beautiful, but they are getting a free ride and charging a lot of money using pictures from the same model that have nothing to do with them, first impressions counts, the picture is from a 20 to 25 years old, this providers was 25 to 30 years old, the picture was 11, She was 9, if you compare side by side, is a ripoff, I be willing to pay that kind of money for the gir in the picture, but for Her, it's was a little too much
Here's the thing... If the pictures do actually look like her, and all you can say is that her hair is longer so maybe they're old, there's no real harm or foul done. However, that is not the case with a LOT of the women using 3+ year old pictures, and I have to admit it's a little frustrating to see guys not only allow themselves to be ripped off, but actively participating in taking money from another unsuspecting guy and another woman like myself, who has invested tens of thousands of dollars into making sure that she IS fairly represented, and that you won't be disappointed with what you open the door to.
'Cause really, that's what you do when you write a review saying she was great, or post lies on a shill thread, or even just say "Nah, I don't like reviewing...". You paid way too much to be treated like that, lied to and deceived, and so is the next guy. And the women who do go through the trouble of keeping their ad copies up to date, maintaining their figure, updating their portfolios, and doing heavens knows what else to constantly improve their service are left scratching their heads, wondering if THEY are the ones doing something wrong.
She shouldn't "look like her pictures" based on a technicality. It shouldn't be a "yeah, if you smear vaseline over your eyes, and then cock your head to the side, that is definitely her". And you certainly shouldn't be paying someone to hang the picture of their photoshop monster on the headboard to get your through. If you don't start at least reporting that the pictures weren't accurate to these women's profiles, then they are never going to stop ripping any of us off.
Remember the saying that kind of goes "you teach people how to treat you"? Don't teach the rest of us that we should be saving all the money we spend trying to reassure you that we'll be showing up...