Politics and Religion

Ga Gambler the same question should apply to you!confused_smile
bigguy30 437 reads
posted

You post lies and then run away like a scared little girl looking for help.

Just a old weak ass insecure clown trying to be tough.
Posted By: GaGambler
Because you CAN'T possibly be the same annoyingfungus that has won SPOTY the last two years running. lol

That was actually pretty damn well said, and even passably well written. Please let me know if you plan to continue to express yourself so well, and please be sure to do so before before I place my bet on this years SPOTY winner.

but this post of yours does beg one question, if you are capable of actually writing this well, why do most of your other posts read like they are written in crayon?

I'm really fed up and tired of the bullshit and lies being spewed by the Arab press and their sycophants in social media and the UN when it comes to who belongs where and who did what to whom in the Middle East. But as I was researching the web for information on an article I wanted to write, I came across this Op-Ed piece by a gentleman in San Jose. I couldn't improve on his words, and so I offer excerpts from his article. you may discuss, lampoon, lambaste or even spew more epithets if that is your choice. I just want to get in my 2 shekels worth. To wit:

 
Jews are from Judea; Arabs are from Arabia.  The Jews are the indigenous people of Israel; Arabs are the colonizers.  Jews are the people of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem, Galilee and Golan.  Israel has been invaded by the Greeks, the Romans, the Arabs and the Crusaders, but the Jewish link to the land has never been broken. Jews have resided without interruption in this land for over three thousand years.  Jews built the cities and every square meter holds archaeological remains from ancient Jewish kingdoms. During the two thousand years when most Jews lived in exile, they never forgot where they came from.

Meanwhile, there never existed an Arab Palestinian nation or a country.  It is a complete hoax.  There never was a Palestinian Arab king of this land; there were no famous Palestinian poets, philosophers, generals; no distinct language, no architecture, no inventions, no battles, indeed, no mention of the “Palestinian” Arab people in any history book written before 1960.  Arabs from neighboring countries started immigrating into Palestine in the late  
19th century to take advantage of the infrastructure and jobs created by the newly invigorated Jewish people.  They came for the same reasons that Mexicans cross the border into the U.S. and that Muslims have flocked to Europe. They came in great numbers seeking a better life than in their Arab lands.

During these years the Arabs dwelling in Israel were simply “Arabs” and, when the term “Palestinian” was used, it always referred to the Jews!  The “Palestinian people” were invented in the 1960s for Cold War purposes by the Soviet communists.  The Arabs residing in Israel began to pass themselves off as the ancient native peoples of this land.  They invented the name, “The West Bank,” for our provinces of Judea and Samaria.  Today they even claim that Jesus was a Palestinian prophet and that the Jews never lived in this land.  They have developed this pseudo-history to dupe the world into believing that their racist terror campaign against the Jews is a national liberation struggle!

The Arabs’ genocidal military assaults on the Jewish state failed repeatedly, so today they are using propaganda and diplomatic shenanigans paid for by Arab oil revenues in their efforts to destroy us.  The Arabs have the power of huge territory and oil money, but Israel has the truth.  Jews have a legitimate claim to this land—legally, morally, and historically. Arab squatters and imposters will never steal the birthright of the Jews and Israel.

Excerpted from an Op-Ed by Daniel Grynglas of San Jose, CA

Posted By: DoctorGonzo
I'm really fed up and tired of the bullshit and lies being spewed by the Arab press and their sycophants in social media and the UN when it comes to who belongs where and who did what to whom in the Middle East. But as I was researching the web for information on an article I wanted to write, I came across this Op-Ed piece by a gentleman in San Jose. I couldn't improve on his words, and so I offer excerpts from his article. you may discuss, lampoon, lambaste or even spew more epithets if that is your choice. I just want to get in my 2 shekels worth. To wit:  
   
   
 Jews are from Judea; Arabs are from Arabia.  The Jews are the indigenous people of Israel; Arabs are the colonizers.  Jews are the people of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem, Galilee and Golan.  Israel has been invaded by the Greeks, the Romans, the Arabs and the Crusaders, but the Jewish link to the land has never been broken. Jews have resided without interruption in this land for over three thousand years.  Jews built the cities and every square meter holds archaeological remains from ancient Jewish kingdoms. During the two thousand years when most Jews lived in exile, they never forgot where they came from.  
   
 Meanwhile, there never existed an Arab Palestinian nation or a country.  It is a complete hoax.  There never was a Palestinian Arab king of this land; there were no famous Palestinian poets, philosophers, generals; no distinct language, no architecture, no inventions, no battles, indeed, no mention of the “Palestinian” Arab people in any history book written before 1960.  Arabs from neighboring countries started immigrating into Palestine in the late  
 19th century to take advantage of the infrastructure and jobs created by the newly invigorated Jewish people.  They came for the same reasons that Mexicans cross the border into the U.S. and that Muslims have flocked to Europe. They came in great numbers seeking a better life than in their Arab lands.  
   
 During these years the Arabs dwelling in Israel were simply “Arabs” and, when the term “Palestinian” was used, it always referred to the Jews!  The “Palestinian people” were invented in the 1960s for Cold War purposes by the Soviet communists.  The Arabs residing in Israel began to pass themselves off as the ancient native peoples of this land.  They invented the name, “The West Bank,” for our provinces of Judea and Samaria.  Today they even claim that Jesus was a Palestinian prophet and that the Jews never lived in this land.  They have developed this pseudo-history to dupe the world into believing that their racist terror campaign against the Jews is a national liberation struggle!  
   
 The Arabs’ genocidal military assaults on the Jewish state failed repeatedly, so today they are using propaganda and diplomatic shenanigans paid for by Arab oil revenues in their efforts to destroy us.  The Arabs have the power of huge territory and oil money, but Israel has the truth.  Jews have a legitimate claim to this land—legally, morally, and historically. Arab squatters and imposters will never steal the birthright of the Jews and Israel.  
   
 Excerpted from an Op-Ed by Daniel Grynglas of San Jose, CA

... but in fact, I do not disagree with your sentiment.

Too many people confuse religious faith, with the dogma that fuels the self-righteousness of the True Believer.

I'm not a religious man Tini, in point of fact, my own family disowned me and considers me a heretic.
But it does not change the fact on the ground, ie my personal connection to the land of Israel via ancestry.

My comments never mentioned god. I don't believe in god. I do believe in fact.

Because you believe it is the correct one?

 Were you there when it occurred? All history is revisionist and inaccurate to a degree depending on which side wrote it.

1. I don't believe Jews are the chosen people,  
I  believe man can only choose his  own  own destiny, no one can choose destiny for others.

2.  Jews are not the only people who lost millions of their tribe to evil men yearning for power.  

3. I  am weary of one standard for you, the Jew, and another for me.  You can call me a back woods barefoot Hillbilly, playing  a banjo with broken strings, and no one will take offense with you, especially me. :-D

 If I gave an ex GF a $ 7000.00 diamond ring when she said  she would  marry me and two months later she tells me she changed her mind and I ask her for my ring back, she calls me an Indian giver, some people would take offense but it would never make the papers like someone when they casually mention a Jew tried to Jew them down.  
 I don't give a damn what she calls me, I just want to take that ring to the pawn shop and hope I get at least a $1000.00 return on  my  seven grand investment.  
 
   When I call you a Jew if you make me an offer of $500.00 for my used seven  year old Escort , when I have it listed  listed on BP for $ 1000.00 firm ,  even though  my Escort is worth  $1000.00  on any market in this country, many people will  call me an anti Semite or a Jew basher .   That's bullshit!  
  I've had to sell my Gold in  pawn shops to pay rent many times .  Long time ago, but like you, I never forget.  

 Other than those few  points that irk me , I agree with everything you said in your post,    
   
  If it comes down to a war between  truth and lies, I'm on your side ,even if you don't play fair with the anti Semitic  card.  

 I  didn't have to go as far as ninth grade before I learned , Israel rightfully owns every inch of land they live on and more.  

   The propaganda Daniel Grynglas mentioned is taught in many Colleges all across America, to brainwashed *Zombiefied students with no clue how to research   fact or fiction, absent of  logic in their own brain to question evident lies.    
 * Zombiefied .. a lazy student who never researches lessons they are taught  looking  for truth, always believing  what they're told without question.  

 

 

Posted By: DoctorGonzo
I'm really fed up and tired of the bullshit and lies being spewed by the Arab press and their sycophants in social media and the UN when it comes to who belongs where and who did what to whom in the Middle East. But as I was researching the web for information on an article I wanted to write, I came across this Op-Ed piece by a gentleman in San Jose. I couldn't improve on his words, and so I offer excerpts from his article. you may discuss, lampoon, lambaste or even spew more epithets if that is your choice. I just want to get in my 2 shekels worth. To wit:  
   
   
 Jews are from Judea; Arabs are from Arabia.  The Jews are the indigenous people of Israel; Arabs are the colonizers.  Jews are the people of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem, Galilee and Golan.  Israel has been invaded by the Greeks, the Romans, the Arabs and the Crusaders, but the Jewish link to the land has never been broken. Jews have resided without interruption in this land for over three thousand years.  Jews built the cities and every square meter holds archaeological remains from ancient Jewish kingdoms. During the two thousand years when most Jews lived in exile, they never forgot where they came from.  
   
 Meanwhile, there never existed an Arab Palestinian nation or a country.  It is a complete hoax.  There never was a Palestinian Arab king of this land; there were no famous Palestinian poets, philosophers, generals; no distinct language, no architecture, no inventions, no battles, indeed, no mention of the “Palestinian” Arab people in any history book written before 1960.  Arabs from neighboring countries started immigrating into Palestine in the late  
 19th century to take advantage of the infrastructure and jobs created by the newly invigorated Jewish people.  They came for the same reasons that Mexicans cross the border into the U.S. and that Muslims have flocked to Europe. They came in great numbers seeking a better life than in their Arab lands.  
   
 During these years the Arabs dwelling in Israel were simply “Arabs” and, when the term “Palestinian” was used, it always referred to the Jews!  The “Palestinian people” were invented in the 1960s for Cold War purposes by the Soviet communists.  The Arabs residing in Israel began to pass themselves off as the ancient native peoples of this land.  They invented the name, “The West Bank,” for our provinces of Judea and Samaria.  Today they even claim that Jesus was a Palestinian prophet and that the Jews never lived in this land.  They have developed this pseudo-history to dupe the world into believing that their racist terror campaign against the Jews is a national liberation struggle!  
   
 The Arabs’ genocidal military assaults on the Jewish state failed repeatedly, so today they are using propaganda and diplomatic shenanigans paid for by Arab oil revenues in their efforts to destroy us.  The Arabs have the power of huge territory and oil money, but Israel has the truth.  Jews have a legitimate claim to this land—legally, morally, and historically. Arab squatters and imposters will never steal the birthright of the Jews and Israel.  
   
 Excerpted from an Op-Ed by Daniel Grynglas of San Jose, CA

dumb idiots keeps holding on to and not realizing it is nothing but a tool to control them.

If incarcerate all religious leaders and ban all religions and get rid greedy MF’s, then we will be able to create livable world instead of the current unlivable one.

Jews, Hindus, Christians, Muslims are all fucked up.

Posted By: anonymousfun
dumb idiots keeps holding on to and not realizing it is nothing but a tool to control them.  
   
 If incarcerate all religious leaders and ban all religions and get rid greedy MF’s, then we will be able to create livable world instead of the current unlivable one.  
   
 Jews, Hindus, Christians, Muslims are all fucked up.

hard working people.  

Why the fuck God needs money? Didn't he allegedly create everything, including money?

1 - Neither do I. Jews as The Chosen People is part of the dogma of the Jewish religion. I identify with the Jewish people, their traditions and rich cultural history. I rejected the Torah as a divine document a long time ago. Sadly, too few in this world are able to separate the dogma from the practical. But there are actual terms within the Hebrew language that delineate between the two. That's a separate conversation.

2 - No, they aren't. Everyone  who does not buy into the Arab holocaust denial bullshit knows about the Six Million Jews killed by the Nazi's, but you don't hear much about the 5.5 million Communists, Gays, Gypsies, and other nationalist and religious people who were decimated in WW2. Right here in the US of A, it astonishes me to research how many millions of Native peoples were wiped out by America's military, and the revisionist histories perpetuated by our own government.
To wit - Go visit the Little Bighorn Battlefield in Montana, (http://www.nps.gov/libi/index.htm) and you will discover an entirely different story than the one you read in your history books at school. Depending on who you believe, Custer was either one of the greatest generals in American history, or he was an arrogant megalomaniac and racist who brutally ordered the deaths of millions of Sioux and Cheyenne people on America's killing fields before finally meeting his own demise at the Little Bighorn.

3 - I find terminology like "being Jewed down", "I got Gypped!" "quit Nigger-lipping that joint!" highly offensive. I'm probably in the minority.
But while you're on the subject of a double standard, I too am sick and tired of Jews and Israel being held to an impossible double standard. If Cuba started firing rockets at Key West, how long before the US would obliterate Havana and launch an invasion from Gitmo?  

Israel has made mistakes, no question. Starting with allowing the Jordanian Waqf to maintain control over the Temple Mount in 1967. They made the mistake of yielding to American pressure when they had Yasser Arafat surrounded in Lebanon in 1982. They should have blown his fucking ass to smithereens; instead American pressure let Arafuck skulk away under the dark of night surrounded by his fellow terrorists, including Abu Momzer, aka Mahmoud Abbas.

Last add - walk a mile in my memories and then tell me if I overplay the anti-Semite card. Would your reaction have been different if my title had read anti-Zionist instead of anti-Semitic? That line gets blurred in today's media. Explain to me how Jews shopping for groceries on Friday afternoon has anything to do with the politics of the middle east?

People saw Islamic terrorists riot maim and kill indiscriminately when a picture of Muhammed was shown in print in a magazine with a circulation of 30,000.
How many Jews went on a killing spree this past weekend when the London Times published a virulently anti-Semitic cartoon of Benjamin Netanyahu?

Here's a double standard for you, those same Arab cocksuckers who kill and destroy in the name of protecting the image of Muhammed have no qualms about producing the most vile and brutal images of Jews and even Christians.
But because they employ the tactics of intimidation, bullying, and violence over even the most trivial matters, the Western world cowers in fear. Fucking cretins and cowards showing their soft yellow underbellies to the predators merely emboldens the terrorists.

And so, one good nasty cartoon deserves another. Doubtful if anywhere near as many people who read the London Times will read this missive. Nonetheless,  Long Live MoHamHead, Patron Swine of Islamic terror.

I have very little  to disagree with in your reply.
  I have never heard "nigger lipping that joint' until you mentioned it, though I have  
 no doubt to it's authenticity.  
 
  I have heard don't "Bogart that joint " hundreds of  times, never wondering where  that term came from, since I already knew from my Southern gentleman nature, it's not  polite to  
 Hog the joint.  
  I reckon I must have subconsciously thought Bogart ate a lot, since I knew very little about Bogart, and quickly passed  the joint after  I had my turn .
   
   I just now  looked it up in the Etymology Dictionary.
"1969, "to keep a joint in your mouth," dangling from the lip like Humphrey Bogart's cigarette in the old movies, instead of passing it on. First attested in "Easy Rider." The word was also used 1960s with notions of "get something by intimidation, be a tough guy" (again with reference to the actor and the characters he typically played)."

 
   I have no doubt "Custer was  an arrogant megalomaniac and racist who brutally ordered the deaths of millions of Sioux and Cheyenne people on America's killing fields before finally meeting his own demise at the Little Bighorn"  
  I'm never a violent person unless self defense aggression is my only course of action, but I would enjoy  cloning  Custer and killing  him again, for fun.  
   
  One of my biggest problems in school was arguing with teachers when I knew they were  teaching lies, especially American History and  Religion  teachers.  
  The truth known, perhaps because of my easy going nature in public, I've never told a Jewish guy, don't even think you can Jew me down , but I've  said that to more than a few Crackers when they were trying.

   If you had been my ninth grade teacher I likely would not have quit school so soon .  :-D    

     

Posted By: DoctorGonzo
1 - Neither do I. Jews as The Chosen People is part of the dogma of the Jewish religion. I identify with the Jewish people, their traditions and rich cultural history. I rejected the Torah as a divine document a long time ago. Sadly, too few in this world are able to separate the dogma from the practical. But there are actual terms within the Hebrew language that delineate between the two. That's a separate conversation.  
   
 2 - No, they aren't. Everyone  who does not buy into the Arab holocaust denial bullshit knows about the Six Million Jews killed by the Nazi's, but you don't hear much about the 5.5 million Communists, Gays, Gypsies, and other nationalist and religious people who were decimated in WW2. Right here in the US of A, it astonishes me to research how many millions of Native peoples were wiped out by America's military, and the revisionist histories perpetuated by our own government.  
 To wit - Go visit the Little Bighorn Battlefield in Montana, (http://www.nps.gov/libi/index.htm) and you will discover an entirely different story than the one you read in your history books at school. Depending on who you believe, Custer was either one of the greatest generals in American history, or he was an arrogant megalomaniac and racist who brutally ordered the deaths of millions of Sioux and Cheyenne people on America's killing fields before finally meeting his own demise at the Little Bighorn.  
   
 3 - I find terminology like "being Jewed down", "I got Gypped!" "quit Nigger-lipping that joint!" highly offensive. I'm probably in the minority.  
 But while you're on the subject of a double standard, I too am sick and tired of Jews and Israel being held to an impossible double standard. If Cuba started firing rockets at Key West, how long before the US would obliterate Havana and launch an invasion from Gitmo?  
   
 Israel has made mistakes, no question. Starting with allowing the Jordanian Waqf to maintain control over the Temple Mount in 1967. They made the mistake of yielding to American pressure when they had Yasser Arafat surrounded in Lebanon in 1982. They should have blown his fucking ass to smithereens; instead American pressure let Arafuck skulk away under the dark of night surrounded by his fellow terrorists, including Abu Momzer, aka Mahmoud Abbas.  
   
 Last add - walk a mile in my memories and then tell me if I overplay the anti-Semite card. Would your reaction have been different if my title had read anti-Zionist instead of anti-Semitic? That line gets blurred in today's media. Explain to me how Jews shopping for groceries on Friday afternoon has anything to do with the politics of the middle east?  
   
 People saw Islamic terrorists riot maim and kill indiscriminately when a picture of Muhammed was shown in print in a magazine with a circulation of 30,000.  
 How many Jews went on a killing spree this past weekend when the London Times published a virulently anti-Semitic cartoon of Benjamin Netanyahu?  
   
 Here's a double standard for you, those same Arab cocksuckers who kill and destroy in the name of protecting the image of Muhammed have no qualms about producing the most vile and brutal images of Jews and even Christians.  
 But because they employ the tactics of intimidation, bullying, and violence over even the most trivial matters, the Western world cowers in fear. Fucking cretins and cowards showing their soft yellow underbellies to the predators merely emboldens the terrorists.  
   
 And so, one good nasty cartoon deserves another. Doubtful if anywhere near as many people who read the London Times will read this missive. Nonetheless,  Long Live MoHamHead, Patron Swine of Islamic terror.

GaGambler369 reads

and yes, even black people use the term "nigger lip" either a joint or a cigarette, that's where I first heard the term was sharing smokes, (of both kinds) with black friends across the street from school as a kid.

as for "jewing" someone down, that's one of the nicest things I will say to my Jewish friends like Nicky. You should hear the bad stuff. I doubt very much that TER would allow most of it to stand.

Lastlhy, I am in complete agreement about Custer, from all accounts it was his own arrogance that got him and his men killed and the only sad part about it was they could only kill him once and he died far too quickly and with far too little pain.

Not Joshua Chamberlin has been credited by many with saving the union at Gettysburg.

That's a new one on me, Grant, and I"m a student of the Civil War in general and Gettysburg in particular.
The cavalry action in which Custer participated is considered by most scholars to be a side show and nowhere near as crucial to the outcome as Chamberlain's action on Little Round Top which preserved the entire left wing of the Union line.
By the time Custer fought (as part of the cavalry action, which he did not lead), Pickett's charge was over.
I can understand why you're not up to speed on this, as your namesake was winning the battle of Vicksburg that same day.

Well, some feel a bit differently. Chamberlin's role was key but some feel it was  somewhat exaggerated. And many wouldn't call Custers action a sideshow. Custer was an idiot no doubt. Post Civil War anyways. I guess one could ask the question what would have happened if Custer had failed to protect Meades rear from Stuart's cavalry? My guess is it wouldn't have been good.  

Many different opinions about Gettysburg. Other than Lee got his ass whipped. And Longstreet was right.  

And yes 'The Man' was taking out Vicksburg. Greatest GenerL in US military history.

-- Modified on 1/20/2015 3:36:56 AM

We should restore nations to their ancient era starting with 0 CE.  

Impossible but interesting thought.

I refer SPECIFICALLY to the lies and revisionist histories perpetuated by Pan-Arabia and their tools.

You're a different kind of tool, but a tool nonetheless.

Usually I ignore the ignorant ones, but I detest people who twist my words out of context in an attempt to reshape the narrative

Fact of the matter is, Abrahamic Religions have fought each other all through history and have controlled their followers. All your reference and justification emanates from hate for each other in the name of whatever stupid and idiotic religions you follow.

I have no use for any religion, never have, never will. Justifications by all of you are from some historical madness and please continue until all of you kill each other off.

Why would I want to reshape your narrative? Keep narrating stupid shit.

GaGambler403 reads

Because you CAN'T possibly be the same annoyingfungus that has won SPOTY the last two years running. lol

That was actually pretty damn well said, and even passably well written. Please let me know if you plan to continue to express yourself so well, and please be sure to do so before before I place my bet on this years SPOTY winner.

but this post of yours does beg one question, if you are capable of actually writing this well, why do most of your other posts read like they are written in crayon?

bigguy30438 reads

You post lies and then run away like a scared little girl looking for help.

Just a old weak ass insecure clown trying to be tough.

Posted By: GaGambler
Because you CAN'T possibly be the same annoyingfungus that has won SPOTY the last two years running. lol

That was actually pretty damn well said, and even passably well written. Please let me know if you plan to continue to express yourself so well, and please be sure to do so before before I place my bet on this years SPOTY winner.

but this post of yours does beg one question, if you are capable of actually writing this well, why do most of your other posts read like they are written in crayon?

Register Now!