Uh...she's using Sativa Rose's pictures and advertising herself as a "Porno Star".
By any reasonable definition, that's a scam. If she's hot, her pictures should be too (and while well-done professional pictures do cost money, they aren't totally unreasonable, and you can do decent amateur pictures with an inexpensive digital camera)- so why should she steal someone else's and lie about herself?
I also note your review says "photo accurate"...so you lied in your review (either she's the girl in the pictures and thus they are accurate or she's not).
THIS GIRL IS HOT! NOT THE SAME GIRL IN THE PIC BUT SO CLOSE... BEST TIME I EVER HAD WITH A PROVIDER AND SHE IS SMOKIN!
beyond that, we have Mr. barryknowsall, but has only one review to his name, and it is Ms. Smokin Stacy hemmmm, anyone smell fish?
Uh...she's using Sativa Rose's pictures and advertising herself as a "Porno Star".
By any reasonable definition, that's a scam. If she's hot, her pictures should be too (and while well-done professional pictures do cost money, they aren't totally unreasonable, and you can do decent amateur pictures with an inexpensive digital camera)- so why should she steal someone else's and lie about herself?
I also note your review says "photo accurate"...so you lied in your review (either she's the girl in the pictures and thus they are accurate or she's not).