I have a friend who is a senior prosecutor in one of the biggest cities in Southern California who told my that almost all of their 647(b) busts come off of BP. Makes sense, cops are usually lazier than hell and go for the low hanging fruit. Stay off of BP, go with well-reviewed girls and you minimize your risks dramatically.
Ostensibly to combat trafficking, putting the screws on BP will send the child trafficking deeper into the dark web much as child porn rings currently operate, thus making it even more difficult to control.
The real aim is to try and squeeze escorts, and not in a good way.
This is to lick the clits of the Bible/prude coalitions
I have a friend who is a senior prosecutor in one of the biggest cities in Southern California who told my that almost all of their 647(b) busts come off of BP. Makes sense, cops are usually lazier than hell and go for the low hanging fruit. Stay off of BP, go with well-reviewed girls and you minimize your risks dramatically.
One of the main reasons I'm rarely willing to TOFTT, you may end up "taking" more than you had hoped!
All the providers out there who aren't being trafficked need to submit anonymous e-mails, do undercover videos, whatever to tell people that we are not trafficked. Clients need to do the same under the cover of anonymity, of course. Shutting down back page will not stop trafficking. Having a site like back page that scumbag pimps go to makes it easier to bust them. If we can't find them, how are we supposed to stop trafficking. All this will do is put most sex workers out of work since BP is one of the only games in town.
Yes, I know there are rip offs on that site on both sides, but that's why I use screening. I think we also need to fight for legalization of the profession and bring it out of the shadows. I saw a show in Canada where is was legal. Some girl had a bad incident with a john becoming abusive. She called the police, and they locked his stupid ass up for battery. It gives us protection.