time with my review numbers. ... Ha. But you would think it wouldn't be too tough to write a formula to average two numbers. Or is that not how they do it?
After all the threads on Provider Math I now find they must have learned from TER.
Just finished looking at the ratings of the now top 25 providers and find that the ratings of at least 8 of the top 25 are incorrect and in many cases the average falls outside of the two numbers being averaged.
I will assume that TER will soon have this corrected but some at least for a short time can enjoy or detest their new rankings.
LOL.
I joked last night with a provider who was affected positively by this snafu. I told her that maybe TER's decided to screw the math and simply rank providers as they SHOULD be rated. 
I'm just kidding; of course, it's not fair to the providers who got moved down on the list by this mix-up.
With all the things being changed and added, the formula used to calculate the average may be pulling in some other values that are unseen elsewhere.
-- Modified on 3/26/2017 8:56:03 PM
These are the averages that fall outside of the two numbers being average.
Rating 9.43 (Looks 9.36 / Performance 9)
Rating 8.76 (Looks 8.09 / Performance 8.36)
Rating 8.54 (Looks 7.55 / Performance 8.27)
Rating 8.36 (Looks 7.56 / Performance 8.33)
Rating 8.3 (Looks 7.4 / Performance 7.76)
I did not look to discover how many averages with the two bounds are wrong.
I assume you reported this.
Maybe the system has not caught up to that new score?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_R2Nwb9fhg
-- Modified on 3/25/2017 7:57:21 PM
time with my review numbers. ... Ha. But you would think it wouldn't be too tough to write a formula to average two numbers. Or is that not how they do it?
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
