have new delhi's back?
The last 13 years has seen US invade Iraq, Afghanistan and now going back to Iraq and new countries Libya, Syria and the new perceived threat from ISIS. All in the Middle East.
Take Pakistan. They were hiding the most wanted terrorist for almost a decade right near the country's capital and their military complex. What did the US do, Nothing.
American Journalist Daniel Pearl was kidnaped by Pakistan Taliban. He was later beheaded. What did the US do, nothing.
Pakistani extremists committed the worst terror attack another US friendly country India in 2008 where 168 innocent men, women and children were killed and a landmark partially destroyed. What did the US do, nothing.
So what is it that is so special Pakistan? They have nukes, right. We have bigger stockpile.
I have to ask what's in it for you?
Unless you are rewarded for your position on ME policy... Why would you be so animatedly concerned with ME policy?
I just answered your counter question, in reverse of the question I asked you.
have new delhi's back?
nstead, New Delhi has US’s back in Afghanistan. Look it up.
US still gives $1 billion in yearly financial aid to Pakistan. All of us can thank John Kerry for spear heading the legislation. We an also thank him for releasing close to $500 million in withheld by the State Department for inaccurate billing
1) blowing up shit in places that got nothing we want
2) based in countries that could possibly kick our ass
3) are paid by us. In this case they are not terrorists, they are freedom fighters. Sorta like mujahedeen were in 80, chechens in 90s ....
We leave those countries and atrocities for Brad & Angelina, George Clooney and other celebrities to take care of.
I wonder how fast we'd launch a full 'nuclear' strike if Dick Cheneys head was cut off?
2) based in countries that could possibly kick our ass
3) are paid by us. In this case they are not terrorists, they are freedom fighters. Sorta like mujahedeen were in 80, chechens in 90s ....
Even you should know that the system is not run on a scale of equality.
Your two comments are so polarizing I don't believe those statements can be considered as cognitive thought.
"We leave those countries and atrocities for Brad & Angelina, George Clooney and other celebrities to take care of."
What does the above entail?... and how is that statement relative to the individual who doesn't follow celebi-nonsense?
"I wonder how fast we'd launch a full 'nuclear' strike if Dick Cheneys head was cut off?"
That's a question which sounds about as relevant as... Your estrogen driven conceptual comparison between celebrity posturing and... geopolitical-affairs.