Minnesota

Why this bugs me
Facepic 664 reads
posted

This type of post annoys me, and here's why. Every single one of these ladies are humans, not an object at Ikea that you click the checkbox to compare it to another object. Maybe she wakes up one day and decides I'm gonna let my bush grow out, or conversely, shave it all off. Does her next concern need to be the "accuracy" of this website. I would argue no. I get the fact that people are spending money, so don't waste your keyboard time on that rebuttal, because the flip side to that is you know more about most women on this site than anyone you would meet on Tinder or match.com. I mean seriously, do you start listing those "requirements" on those sites as well? Some of the best parts of life are the mysteries or surprises. Generally speaking, when a woman takes her clothes off for the first time with you there are many little things within that event that fall into that category. My advice, enjoy the surprise, you might find someone you really click with, and at that point you might be able to politely ask her if she would ever consider growing out her public hair, for example. If she does, well, you might actually be doing something right then.

Bottom line: Ladies = human beings, not menu options at Burger King. Stop thinking in those terms and enjoy each woman who is willing to spend time with you for who she is. Yeah you get more insight here than you ever would on Match.com, but nothing in life is 100%.
Posted By: rd1072
So, assuming search engine accuracy, my search in MN for active (review in last year), attractive (at least 7), quality (at least 7 with at least 5 reviews), FS providers age 40 or under who like to keep it natural (natural kitty and boobs) reveals only four results.  One is not really my type (Chanelle Cheri), and one is above my chosen price point unless she is running one of her specials (Jennie Kennedy, no knock, kudos to her for recognizing supply and demand).  That leaves Aria Hawthorne and Sadie Prescott, both of whom I imagine can be as busy as they want to be, and frankly, could be charging more.  Obviously, then, unless there is a whole bunch of UTR women who are filling the void, there is a huge opening for any naturally attractive woman who wants to get into this market.  If I missed anyone due to search setting error or because I set my parameters too narrowly, I would love any comments or PMs identifying whomever I missed.  Happy Valentines Day!

So, assuming search engine accuracy, my search in MN for active (review in last year), attractive (at least 7), quality (at least 7 with at least 5 reviews), FS providers age 40 or under who like to keep it natural (natural kitty and boobs) reveals only four results.  One is not really my type (Chanelle Cheri), and one is above my chosen price point unless she is running one of her specials (Jennie Kennedy, no knock, kudos to her for recognizing supply and demand).  That leaves Aria Hawthorne and Sadie Prescott, both of whom I imagine can be as busy as they want to be, and frankly, could be charging more.  Obviously, then, unless there is a whole bunch of UTR women who are filling the void, there is a huge opening for any naturally attractive woman who wants to get into this market.  If I missed anyone due to search setting error or because I set my parameters too narrowly, I would love any comments or PMs identifying whomever I missed.  Happy Valentines Day!

fearlessfury649 reads

Wow your over thinking.You must have a lot of time on your  don't lose to much sleep.

Search results are as good as accurate profiles. A natural kitty is a bit of a niche interest in this biz. However, there some top providers here that are more natural at times. Maybe your post will yield some results (it is winter). Good luck. What I think is frustrating is when provider profiles are incomplete in P411 (where they can control what's there) and search results are inaccurate.

Facepic665 reads

This type of post annoys me, and here's why. Every single one of these ladies are humans, not an object at Ikea that you click the checkbox to compare it to another object. Maybe she wakes up one day and decides I'm gonna let my bush grow out, or conversely, shave it all off. Does her next concern need to be the "accuracy" of this website. I would argue no. I get the fact that people are spending money, so don't waste your keyboard time on that rebuttal, because the flip side to that is you know more about most women on this site than anyone you would meet on Tinder or match.com. I mean seriously, do you start listing those "requirements" on those sites as well? Some of the best parts of life are the mysteries or surprises. Generally speaking, when a woman takes her clothes off for the first time with you there are many little things within that event that fall into that category. My advice, enjoy the surprise, you might find someone you really click with, and at that point you might be able to politely ask her if she would ever consider growing out her public hair, for example. If she does, well, you might actually be doing something right then.

Bottom line: Ladies = human beings, not menu options at Burger King. Stop thinking in those terms and enjoy each woman who is willing to spend time with you for who she is. Yeah you get more insight here than you ever would on Match.com, but nothing in life is 100%.

Posted By: rd1072
So, assuming search engine accuracy, my search in MN for active (review in last year), attractive (at least 7), quality (at least 7 with at least 5 reviews), FS providers age 40 or under who like to keep it natural (natural kitty and boobs) reveals only four results.  One is not really my type (Chanelle Cheri), and one is above my chosen price point unless she is running one of her specials (Jennie Kennedy, no knock, kudos to her for recognizing supply and demand).  That leaves Aria Hawthorne and Sadie Prescott, both of whom I imagine can be as busy as they want to be, and frankly, could be charging more.  Obviously, then, unless there is a whole bunch of UTR women who are filling the void, there is a huge opening for any naturally attractive woman who wants to get into this market.  If I missed anyone due to search setting error or because I set my parameters too narrowly, I would love any comments or PMs identifying whomever I missed.  Happy Valentines Day!

Your post bugs me. We are spending a lot of money, thank you very much. Hair may not matter to you, but presumably there are things that do. It's as if you've never heard of such a thing as a fetish. Some guys pay specifically for that, not just for a warm female body.  

Why do they bother posting what are in fact actual menus if they don't want us to think in those terms? Not "your way, right away," maybe, but the last thing they'd ever want is for us to think of them like tinder or match.com hookups.

Your point is understood but this is a business that people chose to partake in. Profile attributes help both parties find a base for great connection or fantasy. This goes for client profiles too (on P411 - if they read them).

A smart business person would want to have their qualities known to make it easier for someone to find them who appreciates these qualities. No one should feel bad about that (whether you're looking for or marketing features)

I take offense to suggesting we don't think ladies are human...of course they are. Those I've met are more human and alive than most of the zombies wandering around through their miserable lives. And just because we found them for certain features we find attractive doesn't mean we don't still enjoy the experience with them for who they are and hold them with great respect they deserve.  

So, you're right this is not searching for a meal at Burger King, it's much deeper and more thoughtful than you think.

They are running a business based on providing a service and many of their clients are looking for certain physical attributes.  Ideally, providers prefer to see the hobbyists who are most interested in seeing them based on various reasons, including their physical attributes.  In short, many guys have a type they are most interested in seeing.  TER is designed to facilitate this.  

We are all free to choose whom we would like to see based on the criteria that matter to us.  That some of those criteria are physical doesn't automatically mean that we think providers are any less of a human being.

Idiot, it's a pay-fuck-leave or fuck-pay-leave.  If your looking for more, then clearly you have some mental issue.

Posted By: Facepic
This type of post annoys me, and here's why. Every single one of these ladies are humans, not an object at Ikea that you click the checkbox to compare it to another object. Maybe she wakes up one day and decides I'm gonna let my bush grow out, or conversely, shave it all off. Does her next concern need to be the "accuracy" of this website. I would argue no. I get the fact that people are spending money, so don't waste your keyboard time on that rebuttal, because the flip side to that is you know more about most women on this site than anyone you would meet on Tinder or match.com. I mean seriously, do you start listing those "requirements" on those sites as well? Some of the best parts of life are the mysteries or surprises. Generally speaking, when a woman takes her clothes off for the first time with you there are many little things within that event that fall into that category. My advice, enjoy the surprise, you might find someone you really click with, and at that point you might be able to politely ask her if she would ever consider growing out her public hair, for example. If she does, well, you might actually be doing something right then.  
   
 Bottom line: Ladies = human beings, not menu options at Burger King. Stop thinking in those terms and enjoy each woman who is willing to spend time with you for who she is. Yeah you get more insight here than you ever would on Match.com, but nothing in life is 100%.
Posted By: rd1072
So, assuming search engine accuracy, my search in MN for active (review in last year), attractive (at least 7), quality (at least 7 with at least 5 reviews), FS providers age 40 or under who like to keep it natural (natural kitty and boobs) reveals only four results.  One is not really my type (Chanelle Cheri), and one is above my chosen price point unless she is running one of her specials (Jennie Kennedy, no knock, kudos to her for recognizing supply and demand).  That leaves Aria Hawthorne and Sadie Prescott, both of whom I imagine can be as busy as they want to be, and frankly, could be charging more.  Obviously, then, unless there is a whole bunch of UTR women who are filling the void, there is a huge opening for any naturally attractive woman who wants to get into this market.  If I missed anyone due to search setting error or because I set my parameters too narrowly, I would love any comments or PMs identifying whomever I missed.  Happy Valentines Day!

Even the ladies I meet on SA are shaved.

I've never in my life had a full bush.. Maybe it's cause I've had chemo as a young girl but even when I don't shave it just isn't enough there to call it a bush.. Lol  

Maybe ask one of your regular girls if they would grow it out for you for a session..  

Happy post VDay Minnesota!!! Hope everyone had a fab one!!  
Xoxo
Gem

Oh gosh, thanks! I'll think about it... ;)

I have a new friend named Summer who's just starting in the biz and will be all natural as well. Keep your eyes peeled!

xo,
Aria

Register Now!