I'm gonna be in NYC again shortly and looking for a few gorgeous dolled up babies with some no-bullshit accurate photos.
Examples of B.S.:Using photos from many years ago.
Using photos that makes her look really fit when she's actually noticeably a good dress size or three thicker in person. Body shape is my primary importance therefore I would consider this false advertisement or even downright fraudulent. I'm willing to book significantly longer appointments with some great NY talent who are using very recent photos that have very little touch ups, if any. Your recommendations, if any?
Just read reviews so you will know exactly how accurately the ladies represent themselves...
As things stand at 10 am this morning:
Number 8, 37, and 67 are good to go. I've seen each of these ladies in some capacity. and are the real deal.
Number 12, 25, 44, 64, 65, and 72 I have met before at M&G's, but have never seen for a one on one. I have a very high degree of confidence that all are worth your consideration, and 44, 64, and 72 are on my to-do list.
Number 6, 10, 21, 22, 23, 23, 24, 25, 46, 71, 73, 94, 97, and 99 are ladies I have never met in person, but are worth considering based on my knowledge of the hobby and the local market.
That being said, none of my personal favorites are on this list, so I wouldn't use it as my primary basis for selecting who to see. But if I were traveling to some place I am not that familiar with, I just might. Lastly, be sure to check on who's visiting NYC the week you will be here, as there might be ladies in town who are on the top listing in their area, which should be enough to include them in your decision making process.
Good luck.
And that she really showed me a good time. TER ID 105077
https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=105077