e only added variable in your new scenario is "jurisdiction". What you're worried about is so unlikely--you're in much more danger driving to work every day. You're missing a basic truth here: you'll never eliminate all risk. The smart play is to eliminate unnecessary risk. Follow the advice others gave you two days ago--that will tilt the odds way in your favor. Good luck. --z
Perhaps there is another thread that covers this but I haven't found it. I am wondering how is the issue of jurisdiction relevant to whether one can be busted for seeing a provider. I mean, if a provider is busted in one county, but you saw them in another county, your own, could LE pursue you and charge you if they suspected you were a client of hers? I am not even sure that is the right question, it is just that I have seen this issue raised in other threads and would like to know its significance. Thank you very much.
minimum of 5-6 reviews all from established reviewers. Then you increase your odds at playing safely.
You might try asking this question in the Legal Corner section.
Chiguy
e only added variable in your new scenario is "jurisdiction". What you're worried about is so unlikely--you're in much more danger driving to work every day. You're missing a basic truth here: you'll never eliminate all risk. The smart play is to eliminate unnecessary risk. Follow the advice others gave you two days ago--that will tilt the odds way in your favor. Good luck. --z
is the one with jurisdiction. Cross-county cooperation such as you seem to be asking about is rare, usually limited to a drug network that's moving a lot of weight across different jurisdictions. Two reasons for this: 1) LE tends to isolate themselves in their own little worlds, each looking to make themselves look better in comparison to the others and 2) it's a money thing, there could be huge debates over who is going to underwrite such a project.