Legal Corner

I agree; I couldn't get through the post, much less the link. (eom)
BigPapasan 3 Reviews 448 reads
posted


END OF MESSAGE

jeandeaux1911 reads

This article presents an entirely novel approach to prostitution reform focused on incremental market improvement facilitated by information law and policy. Empirical evidence from the economics and sociology of sex work shows that new, Internet-enabled, indoor forms of prostitution may be healthier, less violent, and more rewarding than traditional street prostitution. This article argues that these existing “Prostitution 2.0” innovations have not yet improved sex markets sufficiently to warrant legalization. It suggests that creating a new “Prostitution 3.0” that solves the remaining problems of disease, violence, and coercion in prostitution markets is possible, but would require removing legal barriers to ongoing technological innovation in this context, such as state laws criminalizing technologies that “advance prostitution. ” This article considers what Prostitution 3.0 might entail, how it might be created, and whether it would succeed in remedying the ongoing problems in prostitution markets.

GaGambler591 reads

Prostitution is already legal in much of the world and has been for quite some time. There is no reason to reinvent the world, although I am sure the author does have at least a few good ideas, IF anyone is bored enough to wade through this tome.

The article starts on page 1991, and ends on page 2060, meaning it runs a total of......wait for it.....69 pages.  

I'm just wondering how this article made it past the review committee - sure the law students would have found it salacious and interesting, but the advisers usually crush stuff that might be controversial...

Register Now!