You are calculating what percentage of women that you exchanged messages then went on to go to bed with you? So you are ignoring all the women you messaged who did not reply, as well as any women who turned out to be a scam? Where do you put the hookers you could bed, but did not?
Too many variables. The number that sticks in my mind is the low percentage of women under 25 with whom I had scheduled an initial meeting and they showed up. Definitely under 25%? Seems to me the easy conversion is to go from a meeting to fucking. Not necessarily on the same date, but if a woman is interested enough to see me, then I am smart enough to not drive her away. Because I am pretty sure she is seriously considering fucking me, so all I need to do is be pleasant enough to let her feel confirmed in her decision to bed me. I believe I have a zero hit rate on women with whom there was a discussion about price but we did not actually exchange prices. I tried that out per someone's suggestion here and it did not work at all. OTOH, one of my two regulars has completely refused to discuss price at any point, and that went fine. Of all my P4P relationships, she is definitely the most mysterious to me. zigWe all know that prospecting is hard work and as NatS put it, "panning for gold" can take a lot of time and effort. I think most dedicated prospectors love the thrill of the chase and live for that moment when they find that one spectacular glittering golden nugget. So I decided to do a rough estimate of my personal success ration on SA, my hit ratio: how many SBs have I exchanged messages with compared to how many I've been to bed with. I have exchanged messages with about 281 SBs. If I eliminate the 93 who are obvious scammers, unattractive ones who contacted me first, or those who live on the far side of the moon, I have 188 that were at least feasibly possible. Most of those have been relegated to the message archive when it became clear we were not compatible or not looking for the same things. There are 78 message exchanges currently in my inbox, ranging from vaguely possibles to ones I'm communicating with right now and have realistic hopes for. I've had sex with 17 of the 188 possible SBs. Very few were one timers. Most were arrangements that lasted for a month or two, and a few exceptional ones lasted many months to a year. That's a 9% hit ratio. It sounds like very little, but it has meant a steady supply of sex with lovely young women for the past two years, usually 2 or 3 ongoing arrangements at any given time. I imagine some of you guys are more expert at converting possibles into bedmates than I am. Care to share your stats?
Been layed a lot with one n duns. Seen several multiple times. Only 3 ongoing. Most depressing is how many that are so deep in the hole that I have no interest in getting involved. A bullet dodged in my mind.
Still, overall the endless supply makes it fun and in the past 3 weeks I've had relations with 8? Woman. Not bad for a 58 yo fat white guy. Lol.
Those are pretty good stats. It's too much work to compute the precise numbers but, in general, I have a pretty high initial response rate, but then I intentionally cull it back to a handful that I'm really interested in, simply because my time's very limited (can't wait for retirement). The other missing figure that will drive your stats is: how much are you laying out per encounter, and what's the range?
Had 2 BCD meets this week and astrange date. Sunday. Smokin hot panamaniun woman. 400. Did all but greek. She wants to come over again tonite for 300.
Tuesday was a milf. 300. Awhile back she had asked for 500. Total PSE once she got rolling.
Strange date was 150. HJ and finger banging while I drove her home.
I only do pay per visit arrangements, and only in the lower end of the range, like $200 to $350 per visit. And I never pay to have a girl meet me for coffee. I'm sure these limitations have resulted in some missed opportunities, but they also have resulted in some excellent arrangements with some superb young women. Works for me!
You are calculating what percentage of women that you exchanged messages then went on to go to bed with you? So you are ignoring all the women you messaged who did not reply, as well as any women who turned out to be a scam? Where do you put the hookers you could bed, but did not?
Too many variables. The number that sticks in my mind is the low percentage of women under 25 with whom I had scheduled an initial meeting and they showed up. Definitely under 25%?
Seems to me the easy conversion is to go from a meeting to fucking. Not necessarily on the same date, but if a woman is interested enough to see me, then I am smart enough to not drive her away. Because I am pretty sure she is seriously considering fucking me, so all I need to do is be pleasant enough to let her feel confirmed in her decision to bed me.
I believe I have a zero hit rate on women with whom there was a discussion about price but we did not actually exchange prices. I tried that out per someone's suggestion here and it did not work at all. OTOH, one of my two regulars has completely refused to discuss price at any point, and that went fine. Of all my P4P relationships, she is definitely the most mysterious to me.
zig
I agree there are too many variables. Just wanted to get the ball rolling. For the record I was including the ones I messaged who did not respond, but was excluding the scams. No matter. If I limited my calculation to only those I actually met for coffee or a meal or drinks, my conversion rate is way, way higher. I agree that if a SB actually shows up for a meeting she is interested in getting busy. I can think of only two of those initial meetings that failed to develop into a sexual relationship. If I can get a potential SB to actually show up for a meeting, a good sexy outcome is nearly certain.
If just counting number of arrangements that proceeded beyond an initial meet and greet, my stats have been horrible. I don't have exact numbers, but I'd have to guess it's on the order of 1%.
But to be fair, I've also been looking for a very specific type of girl, both physically and on a "connection" level. I've met plenty of "pretty enough" girls who might've been fine for a quick roll in the sack, but I knew wouldn't keep me engaged in the long run so I didn't bother pursuing. I figured at that point I might as well get a pro who met the physical look I wanted since in neither case would the connection matter, and I'd rather not hurt the feelings of someone possibly expecting more from me.