Baby fat--bathed, smells nice, gets comfortable, big smile, "It's showtime!"
BBW--bathed, scented candles surround bed, makes love with lingerie on. "Hey Let's Play!"
Flabby--bath seems a distant memory, sweaty. "Come to momma hunny."
PM me and I will tell you where I rank you. The mods might consider it a shill.
I have met some tall skinny dudes that stink and have dirty balls and some big guys who smell like roses.
Seriously off base.
Jchan has it right
... and the differences can be significant. Where 'a few extra pounds' might be used to describe a lady in one part of the country, BBW would be used to describe her in other areas of the country.
A mental benchmark that I use is based on the first Provider I ever reviewed and I still have that mental image of her naked body before me;
5'6" = 130 #s is about the right height to weight ratio to me. Then, add 10#s for each inch of height over 5'6". And, of course, the shorter the woman, the less I would expect her to weigh. Some women have breasts that can skew the height to weight ratio and I take that into consideration. Younger women can be overweight but still carry it well and look great when naked as their elastin hasn't shown evidence of breakdown and they're still firm and bouncy.
I do realize that I'm really a fool for discussing a woman's weight in public and I will likely be Blacklisted as a result. 
They should stay out of the kitchen lol.
Any lady on this thread should be able to take what you said. If they don't like it, they can always do something about it.
Height can't be changed but going from baby fat, flabby, or BBW in a positive way, that CAN be changed if desired.
Posted By: Drumsticks
... and the differences can be significant. Where 'a few extra pounds' might be used to describe a lady in one part of the country, BBW would be used to describe her in other areas of the country.
A mental benchmark that I use is based on the first Provider I ever reviewed and I still have that mental image of her naked body before me;
5'6" = 130 #s is about the right height to weight ratio to me. Then, add 10#s for each inch of height over 5'6". And, of course, the shorter the woman, the less I would expect her to weigh. Some women have breasts that can skew the height to weight ratio and I take that into consideration. Younger women can be overweight but still carry it well and look great when naked as their elastin hasn't shown evidence of breakdown and they're still firm and bouncy.
I do realize that I'm really a fool for discussing a woman's weight in public and I will likely be Blacklisted as a result.
Drummie was right so far...WK is not...
I agree with Drummie that it's all about the guy's perspective on previous history and innate attraction. Guys will take those terms you ask about and use them as a plus or minus depending on what they were looking for and the mental image in the mind. You can't categorize those labels by height vs pounds though if you ask me. Your baby fat and mine are different so as always form your own opinion on the totality of the information available. I find a nice curvy body and a personality I dig the perfect combo.
I do disagree with WK...big shocker...it is my OPINION that WK's post equates those terms to degrees of cleanliness or hygiene or whatnot. Please fool...
a teenager at 130# is a very different experience from a 25 year old of the same weight/height...
You're very generous with the 10# per inch ratio... I'd go maybe 5# per inch for anything above 5'5"
(And I'd assume girls get even less elasticity-enticing as the years wear on beyond age 25... Though I wouldn't know, as I've never been with a girl over the age of 25, but just based on the "ass-drop" I notice in the strip clubs on the past-prime girls, it would seem to ramp exponentially...)
Baby fat is slightly overweight with cherub-like chubby.
Flabby is really saggy and the forces of nature have caused too much sag. Think of a deflated balloon.
BBW is big with a figure, curves.
There is another level beyond these to describe the very big.
I'd say "baby fat" leads me to think more of a provider that has had kids. Great shape elsewhere, but has a bit of loose skin around the belly that is a tell tale sign she's had kids. Definitely not a deal breaker for me.
I've seen a provider recently that was just obese. I'd never look at her twice on the street had I seen her. But her profile here lists her as "Average" and her pictures do everything to hid her belly. Definitely not average in my book, but I guess that may be the case in the upper midwest, obese is the new average. Maybe for the general population but that shouldn't be the case for providers.
As far as flabby and BBW, not my thing, so I'd stay away from them.
I didn't ask about your preference. I asked "How do you differentiate between them?"
Posted By: LChayse
I didn't ask about your preference. I asked "How do you differentiate between them?"
I simply don't. Both indicate someone I wouldn't want to visit.
It's like trying to differentiate between bitter tones in wine when you don't even drink wine.
If a gal is 18-25 baby fat can still be present because she still has not matured into the woman she was meant to be body wise. Kids grow into their skin at different ages.
For a lady that has just had a child and has a little extra in places I consider that baby fat to a point.
I don't put a weight on starting point of things because breast size, body tone and such can play a major part in weight.
Example: 5'4" and never works out, no butt and A cup probably 110-120 works out daily 115-125.
5'4" and never works out no butt and B-C cup 115-125 works out daily 120-130.
5'4" and never works out no butt and D or larger 120-130 works out daily 125-135.
5'4" and never works out, nice butt and A cup probably 115-125 works out daily 120-130.
5'4" and never works out nice butt and B-C cup 120-130 works out daily 125-135.
5'4" and never works out nice butt and D or larger 125-135 works out daily 130-140.
So outside of the above to areas i look at a lady by what in my mind is ideal weight and this is different for every gal and guy. To me ideal for a lady is when she stands naked with her arms at her sides she looks great! When standing at ease like that I don't want to see her rib cage(too thin for me) and a nice curve to her ass is nice!
Taking that image(height, weight, boob and ass size) into account if she were then;
10-25 pounds over that image, probably baby fat to me.
25-50 pounds over that image, probably BBW to me.
50-75 pounds over that image, probably flabby to me.
As my header states, AGE matters as well!
At my age and having lived through seeing ladies my age move from their teens to 50's, most ladies if they looked great at one weight when they were 18 they look VERY thin at the same weight in their 40's and 50's! They can carry that same good weight MAYBE to 30 before they start looking too thin.
That is the best I can do to explain how I look at a lady per your titles.
TMT
Comment: Most of the ladies I have met if they say they need to lose weight, looked good and those that felt they were perfect probably were a little too thin.
To me models of today are TOO thin
No one can ever agree on them. But for me, baby fat would be a curvy woman with maybe a little bit of roundness in the belly area. BBW is overweight but still good looking. Flabby would be loose skin or sagging boobs.
All of these terms are interchangeable and bear no meaning beyond buying a calling-card in escorts ads for chubby chasers and fat-admirers...
And you forgot the most over used term of them all "curvy"...
These terms are all about as played out as the word "deluxe" is in vacuum cleaner advertisements...
Posted By: LChayse
How do you differentiate between them? Please. Providers & hobbyists reply.
Thank you in advance!
Leigh-Ann Chayse
Thank you to those that have replied. Keep them coming please & ladies, I'd really love to hear from you as well.
Baby fat
I would assume the gal is young & chubby with a plump face, or maybe a little belly soft & chubby after having a baby.
Flabby
Flab can be common & it can be on a skinny gal too, (bat wings anyone) flab is definitely moveable, lose skin.
bbw
It's very, very subjective, with most women holding onto that denial at the top end of chubby (baby fat) what I will say about BBW it seems easier for the shorter gals to come right out an declare themselves bbw as they end up looking rounder when they are short ( many times those gals are lighter than one would think) cute 
The problems that come up are with taller gals, I'm talking 5'6" and over it can be difficult because height will account for more weight & more room to carry it, wether it's muscle, softness or flab really determines what body description you should get & it's so very hard to decide.
I thnk the descriptions should be talked about and agreed upon more specifically.
For instance for some the word athletic is thought to mean thick, solid, but firm.
Others think of it as 6pack and tone everywhere- IMHO makes sense.
What is average? What is curvy?
Skinny fit, and skinny average, & skinny flabby, seems to better describe those who are skinny but would look better with a few pounds.... IDK.....
The description for us gals can be difficult, I think height to weight proportionate is a good way to describe.
Basically anyone who looks better in clothes should just try to be as healthy as they can be and as accepting of themselves as they can, making sure to be clean and smelling extra nice & having confidence in your own skin, even if you have to fake that confidence until it becomes real, confidence is what it's all about, always. 
We woman are to hard on ourselves and need to nurture the mind body connection more. Much like I can usually always find something to like about a mans looks...We, as women are all beautiful in our own way, the sound of our laugh the tilt of our head, the way we walk, nobody should ever count out body language ~ that's what brings it all together. :
Baby-fat - a few extra pounds but nothing significant
Flabby - significantly overweight and out of shape
BBW - large but still with a decent figure.
t is in my honest opinion backed up with a high percentage of fact that most men have zero clue what they're even talking about when it comes to body type & size considering the fact that I'll see a profile of a lady where it says "athletic" build but it's very obvious that said profile is BBW or more American average.
Avg to me is 5'4-5'6, a size 9-12
Flabby is hanging skin, no muscle tone can be any size.
BBW is over a size 18 or 1x rather
...a size 9 - 12 is. I do consider myself a near expert in judging a woman's body type and assigning an appropriate corresponding TER body type descriptive when submitting a review, tho. Also, I have no clue what it means when a woman states her shoe size in her profile or ad or why she even does. I take it that a size 8 shoe is pretty average but she really doesn't want me to buy her shoes, does she? I learned long ago not to buy women clothing because I will never get it right and she will ultimately return it. That's why God invented gift cards.
Well to you everyone is a bbw unless you say otherwise Drummies .
Also, what is the point of buying a lady clothes? I thought those weren't needed no?
Posted By: Drumsticks
...a size 9 - 12 is. I do consider myself a near expert in judging a woman's body type and assigning an appropriate corresponding TER body type descriptive when submitting a review, tho. Also, I have no clue what it means when a woman states her shoe size in her profile or ad or why she even does. I take it that a size 8 shoe is pretty average but she really doesn't want me to buy her shoes, does she? I learned long ago not to buy women clothing because I will never get it right and she will ultimately return it. That's why God invented gift cards.
Just like most things when it comes to what men think about women's appearance.
So where do women that wear between 12 and 18 fall in your eyes? baby fat?
See that's the problem ....a woman can weigh 150lbs and look completely different depending on her height ...its why none of those things matter anymore as you'll never get it right lol
I think it would be better if TER just went to pictograms of ladies shapes that way the reader would get a better idea and go from there .
....baby fat and bbw *shrugs* I guess while you are soft or look it in some places you have a relatively curvy shape to you still. I had a long bout in the gym that ended like 1hr ago so my body and brain are a little too tired to try to elaborate further.
We need a scientific study to solve this insoluble problem
It's sometimes impossible to make a satisfactory body type choice in the review section...
and so we err on the flattering side (unless we're Talon)
It gets even more complicated when you want to do a search and try to filter by body type. Thin? Average? Spinner? Athletic? Choose one, and one only.
One option to improve the system would be to average out the body descriptions of all reviewers. That might get us closer to a useful result.
And the perfect solution may not exist, but maybe it's visual. Give us a selection of 20 representative body images from which the reviewer can choose 3 and keep averaging the result.
Add that to a functioning way of letting us know which pics are real and which are not and you could have a review that's actually worth something.
-- Modified on 7/26/2015 9:40:29 AM
I, like Ms.Mocha, am more of an in-between sizes woman, but I make no bones about my voluptuous physique. Those who love me, love me, those who want a svelte woman or a spinner have many options. Isn't diversity grand?!
It's not the weight, it's how it is distributed.....
Posted By: LChayse
How do you differentiate between them? Please. Providers & hobbyists reply.
Thank you in advance!
Leigh-Ann Chayse
