Agreed. I have seen her several times and there is a good reason. She is very beautiful and has a great personality! I can't even see a score like that for performance even on a bad day. As for her being older than the reviewer likes, any ad or site you would go to look her up, is very clear how old she is.
Saw one of my regulars today.
She got slammed by a review 2 points lower on appearance/performance than her many reviews.
The client uses one name to book for references and another name to review.
Not surprisingly all his reviews are about 1.5 to 2 points lower than the averages for each of his reviewed women.
Also not surprisingly, she has connected his contact name and his review name and is passing the information on to the screeners.
Honesty is one thing, meanness is another.
She got slammed by a review 2 points lower on appearance/performance than her many reviews.
The client uses one name to book for references and another name to review.
Not surprisingly all his reviews are about 1.5 to 2 points lower than the averages for each of his reviewed women.
Also not surprisingly, she has connected his contact name and his review name and is passing the information on to the screeners.
Honesty is one thing, meanness is another.
and why aren't you WK'ing under your real handle. Your post is laughable you hypocrite.
This reviewer has three reviews. In two of the three reviews he complains that the provider was "older than expected". In this case, the provider lists her age as 40-45, which is accurate. Why did he schedule with her in the first place? Other than her "age" it sounds like he had a great time. Slamming her because he evidently didn't do his research is not her fault. She is awesome. If she had misrepresented her age or had no age listed, I would have no problem with his review.
Have met this lady and she is a very attractive lady who is in her 40s and in no way by my experience either aesthetically or performance wise that low. 😏
The numbers on may not matter but when they are so far out of line with her other scores and more importantly with the narrative it does beg to question what is going on.
In going through the top 100 list there is a logjam of providers right where she is now and scores that are manipulated high or low by a significant amount can move one quickly up or down that list.
She could have had a bad day but does not explain the looks number
I have met the lady in question MANY times over the years. She is exactly what she says she is. We have had many wonderful times together and I expect many more. You know I have always thought....what if the provider had to give me a number on performance and how attractive I was.....IT WOULD BE VERY LOW...I promise you that. I will NOT review a lady until I have seen her MANY times....not on just one visit alone. Many things can change......over the course of time. I don't know who the provider was that said this but it really stuck a cord with me and I quote...."Unless you are willing to get nude within minutes after meeting someone...don't go into this business!" Never thought of it that way...but it is so true. You know what the provider looks like before you meet her...she has NO idea what you look like until you walk in the door. The lady in questions is both beautiful on the outside as well as on the inside. She is VERY concerned that she provides you with a great time when you are with her. She will do about anything you ask within reason. These low scores..although a pain in the butt and untrue....will not have any effect on her business. Look at all of the HIGH scores she has. JMO
Agreed. I have seen her several times and there is a good reason. She is very beautiful and has a great personality! I can't even see a score like that for performance even on a bad day. As for her being older than the reviewer likes, any ad or site you would go to look her up, is very clear how old she is.
What I will say is I seriously doubt his review of her will detour anyone that matters from seeing her.
I read his reviews & frankly found myself laughing (at him, not with him) & questioning if the author is an adult or pre-teen taking a stab at a sex ed essay. (I'd have given him a D-) I then proceeded to blow him off accordingly. I have no doubt the type of clientele she is interested in attracting will react in a similar fashion & she will be just fine
Very few people are going to be significantly influenced by a review that is an outlier like that.
doesn't it make you wonder if the OP is full of it or did the provider really discuss the screening information of another client? I sure wouldn't be happy if I was that client. After all isn't screening safe, confidential, and the screening information discarded after confirmed? It appears to me this WK post is not helping the provider, as they never do.
Or that he figured it out some other way. But I agree that this sort of thing is of no value to the provider.
I should clarify...knowing the OP is always full of shit (and conspicuously absent from further comment because he only likes to cause problems) it is entirely possible he put things together on his own. No way to know for certain unless the provider chimes in. That being said, the way the OP was written, you have to agree with me that on face value the post is problematic. But what else would we expect from him?