Reviews that say "she is not the one in the photos but close enough" are giving you what you need to make an informed decision whether to see the lady in question, or not. If you don't like the fact her photos are not really her, don't see her.
A woman with distinctive tattoos that are visible when dressed may have very good reason to avoid letting those tattoos appear in an ad for prostitution. She could have them photoshopped out, to be sure, but that would likely cost money where a stock photo is free. It's her business and her decision to make. If it costs her some clients, again, that is her business. I have seen women who use "close enough" photos a couple times and been very satisfied by the experienceWhat is your opinion on the reviews that say "she is not the one in the photos but close enough?"
Just curious because I don't get that .... Use real photos and block them out or crop them but don't use someone else's photos... Thoughts?
But it's her option to use fake pics and as long as you know they're fake but "close enough " it becomes your option to take a chance and see her or move on down the line. Generally speaking, someone using fake pics won't be getting any of my money.
Reviews that say "she is not the one in the photos but close enough" are giving you what you need to make an informed decision whether to see the lady in question, or not. If you don't like the fact her photos are not really her, don't see her.
A woman with distinctive tattoos that are visible when dressed may have very good reason to avoid letting those tattoos appear in an ad for prostitution. She could have them photoshopped out, to be sure, but that would likely cost money where a stock photo is free. It's her business and her decision to make. If it costs her some clients, again, that is her business.
I have seen women who use "close enough" photos a couple times and been very satisfied by the experience
You know what Minn4evr, The OP was asking an opinion of others, Not asking of anyone to tell him what he could or should do. Nor was he asking about boo hoo, it costs a provider more to do this and that.
You have had success, good for you, so keep doing what you do, But I got news for you, others who hobby, may have higher standards, or greater expectations, than You.
I would fall into a category of, I look for Honesty and an accuracy with regard to an ad, and the review.
You know what, nobodysfool2007, the OP asked for opinions of others. I'm an other. I gave him an opinion. What's your point? If he only wanted to hear from people who agree with him, he should have said so.
I realize you don't like my point of view. That's your right. But I got news for you. I don't give a shit.
You have had success, good for you, so keep doing what you do, But I got news for you, others who hobby, may have higher standards, or greater expectations, than You.
I would fall into a category of, I look for Honesty and an accuracy with regard to an ad, and the review.
No! YOU missed the point, He asked for opinions of others, and yes this includes you as well.
However, he was seeking feedback, on how others feel about reviews that state that the pictures were inaccurate, but close to the phony pictures.
Example : How do you feel, or what do you think ?
about those providers who use inaccurate pictures ?
I perceive, that post as asking, for an opinion, of others, without all this boo hoo, commentary as to why a provider uses phony or inaccurate pictures.
Your post launched into all this useless commentary on why a provider uses inaccurate pictures, That Sir, was Not what the OP was seeking for feedback.
Who fucking cares why she posts those false pictures, its not our issue ! its the individuals issue.
So by all means offer your opinion, however be kind enough to keep the white knight garbage out of it.
As you can clearly see, I frown upon those
who are dishonest, No matter what the reason is.
Don't be so foolish as to attempt to get others to believe that a phony picture is as good as an
accurate picture!
And consider this as well, accepting phony as good enough ? it insults those providers Who make the effort, in posting Real and Accurate pictures.
Well, no. You quote the OP's question accurately, but you miss the point. "He was seeking feedback, on how others feel about reviews that state that the pictures were inaccurate." That is the question I answered. I stated I think those reviews give the necessary information for a reader to decide whether or not to see a provider. Then I stated the corollary, that given that information you don't have to see the provider if you don't like fake pics. Simple.
You, on the other hand, divert the discussion to a question he did not ask, whether a provider using fake pics can be "Honest" (which does make it relevant to discuss why it might be she uses fake pics) or "accurate" (which makes it relevant that on two occasions I have seen women who used fake pics and was completely unsurprised when the door opened). Admittedly, my post preempted the stuff you raise, but it makes no sense to complain about the topics in my post when you discuss the very same topics.
You are blinded by your dislike for me. You think I'm a white knight and find my posts objectionable. It doesn't bother me. But it makes you appear kind of foolish when you don't even pay attention to your own arguments. Frown all you like. I'll post as I see fit.
However, he was seeking feedback, on how others feel about reviews that state that the pictures were inaccurate, but close to the phony pictures.
Example : How do you feel, or what do you think ?
about those providers who use inaccurate pictures ?
I perceive, that post as asking, for an opinion, of others, without all this boo hoo, commentary as to why a provider uses phony or inaccurate pictures.
Your post launched into all this useless commentary on why a provider uses inaccurate pictures, That Sir, was Not what the OP was seeking for feedback.
Who fucking cares why she posts those false pictures, its not our issue ! its the individuals issue.
So by all means offer your opinion, however be kind enough to keep the white knight garbage out of it.
As you can clearly see, I frown upon those
who are dishonest, No matter what the reason is.
Don't be so foolish as to attempt to get others to believe that a phony picture is as good as an
accurate picture!
And consider this as well, accepting phony as good enough ? it insults those providers Who make the effort, in posting Real and Accurate pictures.
Your are correct, I don't know you, and so it is not about dislike of you personally, but from what I am able to gather from your board persona,
I do not agree with the way in you come off as condescending, such as, " You don't have to see them if you don't like it"
and the further commentary as to why they post phony pictures, As I said before, who fucking cares why, It is still dishonest.
Just because you are pleased with what is on the other side of the door, does not mean that I or the OP would be pleased.
And there is no need of you to engage in insulting
someone's intelligence by making some lane ass statement, as the OP had already stated his own
opinion, and thus tends to stay away from those kinds of providers.
Both of you guys, minn4evr and nobodysfool, have some good points but mostly it makes me feel like I'd like to have a few beers with you both and just listen to you guys go back and forth for a while...and then go see a lady to get my rocks off. Excuse my words, I've been drinking, had a bad day lol.
Sorry to hear that you have had a bad day.
A cold beer among friends is always Fun.
And having a couple of beers and then go and getting your rocks off, would be a lot more fun and productive, than listening or reading, a debate between me and minn4evr LOL
Here's to hoping that the next day, is better than the day before.
Let me know Oldtimerb and I'll show up and buy a round!
The providers do girls night out's, we should too!
I would show up too! We should get together so.etime...it would be enlightening...other hobby have social gathwrings...this one should as well. Think about it...
Sounds like a grand idea? What could be better. Beer, discussion and lovely ladies!
I disagree with your statement that his commentary is useless. His reasons for thinking as he does are relevant. I've read many an opinion that at first glance made no sense to me but after reading the writer's reasoning I at least understood better where he or she was coming from and sometimes I even changed my mind to a lesser or greater degree based on what I read.
It is of course your right to refuse to see any provider who uses any pictures that are not actually of her. It does not mean that everyone who holds a different viewpoint is automatically wrong.
Umm, I disagree!
What gets under my skin, is the manner in which he
responded to the OP
" If you don't like what you see in the review,
you don't have to see her"
When the OP already stated his dislike of those
who use inaccurate or phony pictures.
Let me state my opinion, Did minn4ever really think that we are that clueless, or stupid, that we would feel obligated to see someone who uses
phony or inaccurate pictures ?
Is it not logical to conclude, that myself or anyone else who dislikes the idea of phony pictures, is going to Not see a provider who uses
phony pictures ?
And then his brief commentary, on why a provider
posts phony pictures.
And again, I say, Who Cares why ?
How is his explanation relevant to the OP ?
From what I understand, the OP, was not seeking information on why a provider posts phony pictures in an ad. He asked for opinions, or who do we feel about it ?
Like I have stated previously, useless commentary,
and appearance of what I see as a condescending statement.
Needless to say, Its been hashed over, and both myself and minn4evr got our opinions heard or read, and now you have had stated your opinion as well.
Thanks for sharing.
It was not my intent to highjack the thread, so now back to the OP, and what is relevant to the thread.
I will not see a provider who uses phony pictures, even if a review says it is close enough.
At least those who are members of TER have the benefit to read a review, and then gage if the reviewer is creditable ?
But then again, the review is subjective to the eyes of the reviewer, and maybe his observations
are a bit skewed ?
So needless to say, I won't bother with a provider
who uses phony pictures.
Far as I am concerned, It is deceitful, and not worth my time, or effort, and it is an insult to those providers who put up accurate pictures in their ads.
Safety says don't see a provider that uses totally fake pics. I understand and agree with that, generally, but I will admit over the years I have seen many a provider that used completely fake pics (anyone else remember hobbying off City Pages classifieds before the internet arrived where you would just get a physical description of the girl from either a male or female booker??) and I have had great experiences that I will remember forever and I have sent girls away. With that being said, there are also providers that use a mixture of real and not real pictures in ads. There are also many providers that use absolutely real pictures that are either current or "outdated". For me, it's the nature of the business. Providers will put up the most flattering ad, with the most flattering words and pictures, to try to capture business. It's always in the eye of the beholder when it comes to judging beauty and when it comes to judging the legitimacy of pictures posted in an ad. I've seen and reviewed more than one provider that I was like WTF were the other reviewers thinking when they gave her that appearance score. For me, I'm aware of, and comfortable with the fact that the hobby is based on deceit. Just my thoughts as I agree with both sides of this particular argument. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. 
At least those who are members of TER have the benefit to read a review, and then gage if the reviewer is creditable ?
But then again, the review is subjective to the eyes of the reviewer, and maybe his observations
are a bit skewed ?
So needless to say, I won't bother with a provider
who uses phony pictures.
Far as I am concerned, It is deceitful, and not worth my time, or effort, and it is an insult to those providers who put up accurate pictures in their ads.
It doesn't bother me if the pics are 'close enough' but I'll add that providers who use fake pics are probably less likely to be a good match for me unless they state the pics are just representative in the ad.
It's not that I consider those providers dishonest -- I can completely understand why they'd want to be that much more discreet, but my sense is it's a much higher chance of YMMV