The fact that established providers don't get many new reviews is quite the opposite. It doesn't mean they haven't been active in the hobby, it means they are catering to their established client base, not new clients. Ladies get a lot of reviews when they first start out because every client is new. If you're a good provider, your client base will grow and the fewer reviews you get. TER shouldn't punish the ladies who are doing a good job and taking care of business. Clients can review a provider more than once, the new review will replace the old one.
Did you know, if a lady hasn't had a review in 3 months they are removed from the Top 100 list.
Guess I'm off the list. LOL
Thoughts?
Gabby XOX
If that's the case ... Must make sure to get some soon I guess.
I personally think 3 months is a bit too early but that's just my opinion.
You've gone 3 months w/o f$cking? I would die if the happens to me.
Guess I'm off the list. LOL
Thoughts?
Gabby XOX
The fact that established providers don't get many new reviews is quite the opposite. It doesn't mean they haven't been active in the hobby, it means they are catering to their established client base, not new clients. Ladies get a lot of reviews when they first start out because every client is new. If you're a good provider, your client base will grow and the fewer reviews you get. TER shouldn't punish the ladies who are doing a good job and taking care of business. Clients can review a provider more than once, the new review will replace the old one.
Amen, my dear.
ew crazy rule ter is making I guess because #1 Halle did not have reviews for like 8 months and she has 2 recent ones from Sept so this rule must have just happened or we's have a brand new #1.
There are alot of new girls on the bottom that you would never expect in the top 100 so yah you are right
TER does not cater to wants OR needs of providers or hobbyists...it's much like when I was growing up playing sandlot baseball or football. The bully makes and changes rules just to suit his own needs. Because we want to play the game, we have no choice but to go along with it. Maybe that is why more and more are defecting to other places.....
She did drop off for a while. When the Minneapolis/Minnesota mess was corrected to being back to just Minnesota, she was dropped off the top 100 lists.
new crazy rule ter is making I guess because #1 Halle did not have reviews for like 8 months and she has 2 recent ones from Sept so this rule must have just happened or we's have a brand new #1.
There are alot of new girls on the bottom that you would never expect in the top 100 so yah you are right.
So uh they should just stay on the list eternally with 20 reviews none current? Right. Quit you're bitching
It doesn't mean we aren't active.
Who said that? If you're being successful wo reviews, what's your issue? Why care? I'm confused.
In the past year two highly rated providers have asked me to not review them.
that they have to have a review within the last 6 months. Unless the rule changed recently that's the requirement. One every 6 months doesn't seem that unreasonable, it's a review site. A lot can change in 6 months. If it has been changed since May, when I inquired about it, then I would agree 3 months is probably not enough time. Ms. Moore was removed after 6 months of not having a new review. She received one and now she's back. In another 6 months she'll fully screen someone get their ID and then armed with that information obtain another 10/10 score. See the system works.... somewhat.