Pics look "borrowed" even without a google search.
This lady has 17 reviews, going back to October 2013, but I find very little posting history for her reviewers. I've checked the Mn board, Wi board, General board and Newbie board going back 300 days for each of them, and this is all that I find:
Not many posts, and all of them recent. Two of them have more than ten reviews, and only one has written enough to sound credible. I just lost my VIP, so I can't check reviews for the others.
She's also advertizing $100/hour: http://minneapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hottest-lady-around-i-will-rock-your-socks-off-100-100-100-100-100-33/12648216
Fishy?
-- Modified on 8/8/2014 3:33:45 PM
Pics look "borrowed" even without a google search.
she recently was part of the cast of the movie "chef"
I have seen Ginger a few times and I can assure you she is a legitimate provider. Those aren't her real pics but she looks similar to that. She is an attractive woman with an athletic build. Very much worth the donation. I'd see her more often if she lived a little closer. She does do outcall after she's comfortable with you for an additional fee. In short I wouldn't hesitate to recommend her.
Since the.. "I'm too cheap to buy a VIP, but want you to use yours instead" method doesn't play too well here. Instead, cast doubt on a provider for really no reason other then to fish for info.
Good job, Congratulations!
I had VIP up until a few days ago, and even looking at a few full reviews I wasn't 100% sure. Letting it lapse only kept me from going back to double check some of the other reviewers. It doesn't change the fact that none of them are active board users with any sort of established reputation.
It's also not exactly unprecedented to ask whether reiewers are fake: http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=197937&boardID=21&page=#197937
-- Modified on 8/10/2014 5:24:36 PM
As I post this there are over 26,000 users online at TER. MOST are not posting on a board. How did it come to be that a reviewer needs a discussion board history to be a credible reviewer. That's BS. This is a REVIEW site that happens to have discussion boards. Lots of guys and gals don't post on the discussion boards. I don't post much anymore, does that impact the cred of my reviews, no it does not. And, of course IF you still had VIP you could PM some of her reviewers if you still had questions. Also, your OP had plenty of information contained in the post to make a decision to see the woman. WTF, did you want an invitation from her?? 17 reviews since late last year...sheesh.
It's your right to post as you did, but when the evidence that you were looking at was sufficient, (imo) don't be surprised that some of us would question why you even brought the issue up. And why let VIP expire? If you are an active hobbyist that makes no sense.
First, 300 days is the *minimum* that I checked. I looked back 3000 days (8+ years) for several and found nothing. Compare that to your posting history on just the MN board:
...or Derpdydoo's:
So while you may not post as much as you used to, that's not what's going on here.
BTW, I never said that anyone *needed* a posting history to be credible. It's just one thing that I check. I did a forum search in this case because a lot of her reviewers have just a few reviews.
Secondly, I'd recognize your handle if I saw it in a review. Ditto for derpdydoo, mntom, pivotme, commspec, bigRV, steelhand, ezra007, pollenbroker, vorlon, kpg1977, genrev, thorsdad, TC guy, Hersh54, Petra7 and plenty of others. I didn't recognize any of Ginger's reviewers. I can't remember the last time that's happened.
>> And, of course IF you still had VIP you could PM some of her reviewers
Maybe. But a lot of those 20,000 users don't have VIP, don't log in all the time, or don't check their PMs. (I answer most of the 411 requests that land in my inbox, btw.)
>> WTF, did you want an invitation from her?? 17 reviews since late last year...sheesh.
Kitten had at least four reviews when Derpdydoo questioned her legitimacy (link above), and at least two of those reviewers had posted quite a few reviews of other providers. It's easy enough for a pimp to shill for all of his ladies. Speaking of which, there's a site similar to theirs in Montreal:
http://mtltopgirls.escortfiles.com/models/5544
http://asiantopgirls.companionfiles.com/models/22712
When I checked TER, most of their ladies' reviewers had just one review and no posting history. That's what I noticed with Ginger's reviews.
>>And why let VIP expire? If you are an active hobbyist that makes no sense.
Anonymity is an issue for me. I bought VIP when they had the Trust Cash option. I have a few regular ladies that I see, so it's not a security problem unless I'm looking for someone new.