Her story is plausible as is the alternative. But I don't see as it makes much difference.
I was in Southern California and had an erotic massage from a woman that pops up all the time from her sponsored ad on a national (perhaps international) massage site.
During the massage I asked her why she had recently changed her last name in the ads. She said that one of her clients had secretly videotapes a session and had posted it on various web sites where he was paid on pay per click. Some of the sites used her last name so she had to use a different last name.
What I do not get it.....she claimed that she only does happy endings, no FS or BJ. If she knows a client, she will do a nude session.
So....how many clicks would a nude HE ending video get? Or is she not giving the whole story, and probably had a FS session with the client involved.
Opinions?
...internet porn. I can enjoy watching tug job videos with paid actresses but I don't think I'd really get into watching tug jobs performed by women who were unwillingly, secretly taped. But I'm sure there's lots of people who would get off on that. What if a person would get $0.03 cents every time someone clicked on such a video? If, in one month, 2,500 people clicked on that video you could make $75 per month. If a person had 10 of these videos posted that could equal $750/mo or $9,000 a year. That's a nice little supplemental income for little effort. I have no idea if $0.03 cents/click is realistic or not.
If an established client would break her trust in that way, I imagine things would change quite a lot
Her story is plausible as is the alternative. But I don't see as it makes much difference.