But all guys like girl only pictures. If this is a business I'd suggest not taking the risk to have guys in your photos. It can turn off the fantasy for some of your potential and existing clients

If you're in the photo I'm not gonna be lookin' at the guy anyway.

Not really interested is seeing a guys backside.  

For almost any ad in any industry a photo is inviting the consumer to have a vicarious experience (like on a beach, in a bar. Etc). When I see you unbuttoning a faceless guy. I can think "wow I wish that were me" (exactly what you want). If he is naked I think "whoa that is NOT me" (and it's kinda a turn off)

Allow me to add another thought (since you asked! marketing is my career so I'm thinking a little deeper than you might have wanted- but you obviously want fresh opinions). A photo ad campaign (any series of shots you choose to use over a period of time) that creatively and tastefully includes a faceless guy could set you apart from all the typical provider ads.  

A critical marketing element for anything is always 'what differentiates me?' 'How can I be remembered uniquely in a crowded market?

In this case lots of women are competing for the same set of male eyeballs (and other balls! LOL!). So you want to capitalize on your unique set of qualities. And find the little twist that sets you apart from others on the creative side. You might hVe stumbled on an idea that has value in this way.  
My head is now spinning with other threads to this (we can chat later)but...

To your basic question - including a guy can be a turn off; but perhaps it can be creatively enticing if you ask yourself in each photo: "Can my target audience see himself in this picture"

Trust that helps babe! Have a great visit in Chicago

I would prefer not to see it. Seeing just you keeps a little mystique to our encounter. And it doesn't add anything to your beauty.

be sure that any photos depict what you are interested in and what would be comfortable to your clientele.  If many of your clients are overweight  and/or older guys then some young Atlas might make them feel unwelcome.

It might be better to just feature yourself in an attractive manner than complicate the picture.

For me sensual and teasing beats raunchy in photos.  Raunchy is good BCD

-- Modified on 7/27/2015 3:43:24 PM

I think that photos with a male in them, when tasteful and artsy can be done really well. I also think that being full nude can be done really well too, but I HAAAAAATE spread eagle vag shots. I agree with the OP that some things should be left to the imagination. And, while for pornstars it may just be like nothing to post your vagina online, I just don't find it all that attractive. And, I tend to think that it will attract the wrong kind of guys. Thats just me. Personally, I have changed my style over the years that I have been in the business and maybe would have posted shots showing my vag once upon a time, but I look back and go WOW- what was I thinking?  

I haven't ever used a guy in my photos though, and I do offer MFM. I just haven't ever had the opportunity to shoot with my partner, and if I did they wouldn't be action shots ever. Though, I am currently working on putting up a paid membership website in which I would be okay featuring all that kind of stuff. I kind of look at it like that old saying "Why pay for the cow..."  

But, like I said- I went through my own learning process when it comes to my style of advertising and I can't fault any ladies that think they are giving the guys what they want by posting that. I just tend to think that they may not know better. Or, maybe they do... I don't know.