warning retracted?
I forwarded a warning about a girl here (second link in the post):
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=191780&boardID=21&page=10#191780 Wadzilla posted this: http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=191812&boardID=21&page=10#191812 The ad used the term "Laguna's finest," and the alledged problem was LE related. There's now an ad: http://minneapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/laguna-beachs-finest-21/11363560 That traces to this review page: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?ID=245327 ...which has at least one credible reviewer (Kpg1977). I'm not sure why I didn't find the above page if she used the same number, but maybe she didn't. Does anyone else know this girl or the other reviewer (slpmaverick)? Tats should make the lady easy to ID. She's hot, so it's be a shame to shy away if the warning on BP was a hoax.-- Modified on 4/3/2014 8:58:58 PM
If in fact she is back, she was a great time. The tats did match up. The lady Kellz I saw was those pics. But I do remember contacting another gal with same pics but she had no idea who I was, yet I know the Kellz I saw saved my number in her phone. We were texting for several weeks afterwards. I was shocked to see the LE warning but had already lost contact with Kellz by then.