I don't mind ammending a review, if there are some private comments that the provider would like removed. But I wouldn't change my opinon-points.
It did happen one time - they seemed to appreciate the review, but asked me to remove some comments about their personal life, that might make it easier for those in the "real world" to identify her. I had included them because I thought they made her sound more interesting and intellectual (always an added bonus with a provider). She wanted them out, I requested, and TER removed the two sentences.
I met a provider who says this happens to her most of the time, and I was surprised.
Or maybe it is common practice? Do any of you 'discuss' your rough draft with the provider before posting the review?
this is totally up to the reviewer... use common sense when doing the review... if for example a lady firmly says on her website she does not do Greek or BBBJ or.... (ETC) but DOES provide that service for you... best left OUT of the review... just be happy she hit it off enough with YOU to give you that service... in cases like that, I up the score, but the details remain with myself and the provider.
I have had the unfortunate unpleasantry (*I’m making up my own words LOL*) of a gentleman specifically recalling events that I do not normally offer...… to make the decision as a hobbyists to decide to leave out such details in a review is very much appreciated by a provider that might just have enjoyed your company more than the usual experience. Thank you for mentioning that little detail...… Kisses ~T
but you can try asking her questions about her menu or breast size. I'm really bad at guessing breast size.
If you send a draft, she may try to influence it to get more positive reviews or something. Be a man and write a good review the first time. There's no need for a draft or second opinion or anything. Maybe spell check, but that's it.
I appreciate the opportunity to ask that my phone number not be included, or a description of my tattoos, or anything else I feel is much too identifying.
I've never taken it as an opportunity to influence for a better review. I appreciate honest thoughts on the time together.
I think I've only had guys send me a draft of a review before they post it three times. If the provider has certain requirements such as not including phone numbers or certain details then you should respect that but don't feel obliged to show her the review before you post it.
This has happened to me several times, however, I would never solicit it... they were always good reviews, so I'm not quite sure why the clients bothered... just to get errors corrected, I suppose.
This way if they don't have VIP they can see the gory details.
Sometimes they balk at the candor I use, and then they shut up when the phone starts to ring.
Never. My reviews, such as they are, will be mine, not hers.
If the experience was a happy one I will (after) ask the lady her preference about reviews. Several have asked that I not do one, and I have respected that.
If the experience was a bad one (only once since I found TER) I won't even mention reviews, it's a given that in that situation I am going to do one.
...believe it or not, I submitted a Problem Report to staff to have this review pulled down and they rejected it. The following is some of what I wrote in the P.R. and the attached link is the actual review: "...First he identifies the specific hotel that he saw the provider in with an address ('State road 44 at the xxxxx') and then he states that he had promised the provider a great review ('I promised her a great review..and here it is baby'). I would surely hope that any review that specifically identified what hotel he saw the provider at, AND clearly states that he had PROMISED the provider a great review would get taken down. This almost seems as though it was written to test TER's boundaries."
I guess discretion, safety, and objectivity don't mean shit to TER anymore? I really don't have the time or energy to duke it out with them over this review, and I certainly don't need the 2 VIP days. But clearly this is a review that was stupidly written and worse still, stupidly approved. Someone else who needs the VIP days should take a crack at another Problem Report.
BOTTOM LINE: DON'T GIVE THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF WHERE YOU MET THE PROVIDER AND DON'T PROMISE HER A "GREAT REVIEW". It's wrong on many levels, and TER might actually wake up and NOT approve your review if you do so.
-- Modified on 9/18/2006 7:12:30 PM
As I read the review it seems possible that he could have made the promise of posting a great review after the session. If that is the case and that is how he really felt about the session then I see nothing wrong with that at all.
I do agree with you that location specific information is not only poor judgement but at the end of the day it has no value added impact to a review. If you want to say a nice upscale hotel or on the other hand a dumpy sort of a hotel then fine but I agree, specific location is in poor taste.
...even if the promise is being made as you're walking out the door of an incredible session. As for the nimrod in question, it's unclear as to when and under what circumstances he made his promise. But since he is a nimrod (remember he did specifically I.D. the hotel, and his tone in general suggests this), I suspect he promised it early on in the session in hopes that it would improve the service.
This is in a way hilarious, but also very improper, to say the least.
-- Modified on 9/19/2006 11:53:48 AM
Its not just that one either.
The reviewer who wrote this REALLY tacky review has two other reviews as well. In both cases, the lady has nothing but piss poor reviews - except his.
This is just my opinion of course, but all of his reviews appear suspect. Buuuuuuut what do I know 
I don't mind ammending a review, if there are some private comments that the provider would like removed. But I wouldn't change my opinon-points.
It did happen one time - they seemed to appreciate the review, but asked me to remove some comments about their personal life, that might make it easier for those in the "real world" to identify her. I had included them because I thought they made her sound more interesting and intellectual (always an added bonus with a provider). She wanted them out, I requested, and TER removed the two sentences.
sounds reasonable