Florida

Verbiage
Professor392 2 Reviews 164 reads
posted

That stimulated the brain much more.

As a writer do you prefer using visual and stimulating descriptions of time spent in sensual bliss or putting up abbreviations  

You as the writer :  the excitement moved so quickly that she ravenously took my cock in her mouth and pleasured me till I could stand it no longer and exploded in her mouth or BBJCIM .... which is your style of choice and why

You as the reader : Do you prefer reading the longer romance type review that gives you blow by blow excitement triage or just give me the goodies in abbreviations better yet just list them .... two tough choices can you pick just one ?

Ladies as stupid as this question probably seems to you, do you have a preference ?

My choice ....  a wordier verbiage because it gives the reader a better feel to how the writer emulates his time spent and allows other aspects that just don't shine through a few simple letters

Kisses Haley

A more descriptive, involved style is preferred. Abbreviations aren't very sexy or imaginative.

I never write using abbreviations and it's all words and not even use cock or pussy but innuendo mount and kitty or cat for example...

When I write a review, my intent is to narrate an erotic adventure of passion by setting the scene and describing, from my perspective, the actual feelings and sensations of the moment, nonetheless, I must also take into account the standard language used by the target audience. Abbreviations should not take the place of narration, but they do have meaning and convey a message with its own place in story-telling

Verbiage tells the story.  After all its about two people (well sometimes more than two) not about an engineering process.  Most of my reviews describe the experience with words.  Unfortunately the encounter may turn out to be mechanical and so that review is probably going to reflect that with abbreviations.  

When I read review I look for it to describe the experience.  I am not looking for a menu of activities but rather how the chemistry worked.  For example if the reviewer had an intense unforgettable encounter, which juicy details would tell the story best?:

"We started out with LFK/DFK" or

"She had walked up to me and without introduction had put her arms around me, drawn me close and put her lips to mine. The initials DFK cannot properly describe this kiss. When we finally paused, (I can't say we broke off because we kissed the whole time we were together), we were completely synced. The kiss had just the right pressure, the right moisture, and our lips never quite separated. Even our breathing synchronized. Tongues touched. Lips caressed. Hands and fingers moved over one another. At first our bodies sort of moved counter to one another in different directions. As the kiss deepened I realized we were starting to move together in rhythm. You may think that a long kiss would get boring but when our lips finally moved apart I was still moving for her like a baby wanting its mother's breast."

That stimulated the brain much more.

Register Now!